Workplace Innovation and Wellbeing at Work: A Review of Evidence and Future Research Agenda

  • Aditya Jain
  • Vlad Dediu
  • Gerard Zwetsloot
  • Stavroula Leka
Part of the Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-Being book series (AHSW)


Researchers have focused efforts for many years on understanding the determinants of wellbeing at work. Recently focus has been placed on the promotion of workplace innovation as such a determinant. In this chapter, we briefly examine definitions of workplace innovation and wellbeing at work and discuss key the determinants of wellbeing at work. In doing so we present findings from studies based on relevant theoretical models in work and organizational psychology like the Job Demand Control (Support) Model, and the Job Demand Resources Model and work organization and psychosocial factors as key concepts in theoretical knowledge as well as applied practice in relation to wellbeing at work and overlaps with workplace innovation. The chapter then proceeds to discuss commonalities in good practice interventions at the organizational level, specifically focusing on Vision Zero and PRIMA-EF. At the company level and policy level, ‘Vision Zero’ (zero accidents, zero harm, etc.) is an example where innovative solutions for the promotion of wellbeing and health and safety are encouraged. In the PRIMA-EF model, focus is placed on achieving optimal conditions that can enhance a range of outcomes. The chapter also reiterates the compelling arguments on why interventions at the policy and organizational levels should aim to promote factors that represent common key determinants and how these can present important opportunities. Finally, we conclude by arguing that workplace innovation and wellbeing are not only linked but also dependent on one another. Considering the current evidence base, recommendations for future research and practice are made while also referring to the relevance of policy level interventions to promote them in the workplace.


Wellbeing Workplace innovation Work organization Psychosocial factors Job demands Job resources Vision Zero PRIMA-EF 


  1. Alarcon, G. (2011). A meta-analysis of burnout with job demands, resources, and attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 549–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker, A., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology & Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. (2011). Subjective wellbeing in organizations. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship, 178–189.Google Scholar
  5. Backé, E. M., Seidler, A., Latza, U., Rossnagel, K., & Schumann, B. (2012). The role of psychosocial stress at work for the development of cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 85(1), 67–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergh, L. I. V., Hinna, S., & Leka, S. (2014). Sustainable business practice: Integrating psychosocial risk management into a company management system. In S. Leka & R. Sinclair (Eds.), Contemporary occupational health psychology: Global perspectives on research and practice (Vol. 3). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Bergh, L. I. V., Hinna, S., Leka, S., & Jain, A. (2015). Developing a performance indicator for psychosocial risk in the oil and gas industry. Safety Science, 62, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergh, L. I. V., Hinna, S., Leka, S., & Zwetsloot, G. I. J. M. (2016). Developing and testing an internal audit tool of the psychosocial work environment in the oil and gas industry. Safety Science, 88, 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biron, C., & Karanika-Murray, M. (2014). Process evaluation for organizational stress and well-being interventions: Implications for theory, method, and practice. International Journal of Stress Management, 21(1), 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birtch, T. A., Chiang, F. F., & Van Esch, E. (2016). A social exchange theory framework for understanding the job characteristics–job outcomes relationship: The mediating role of psychological contract fulfillment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(11), 1217–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonde, J. P. E. (2008). Psychosocial factors at work and risk of depression: A systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 65, 438–445.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. British Standards Institution (BSI). (2011). Publicly Available Specification 1010: Guidance on the management of psychosocial risks in the workplace. London: BSI.Google Scholar
  13. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., Giovannini, E., Lovins, H., McGlade, J., Pickett, K., …. Wilkinson, R. (2014). Development: Time to leave GDP behind. Nature, 505(7483), 283–285.Google Scholar
  15. Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. de Jonge, J., van Vegchel, N., Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W., & Dormann, C. (2010). A longitudinal test of the demand–control model using specific job demands and specific job control. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17(2), 125–133.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. DGUV. (2008). Prävention lohnt sich: Die Position der Selbstverwaltung der gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung zur Prävention - Leitlinien und Umsetzung - Mitgliederversammlung 2/08 der DGUV, Fulda.Google Scholar
  18. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective wellbeing: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Eatough, E., Way, J., & Chang, C. (2012). Understanding the link between psychosocial work stressors and work-related musculoskeletal complaints. Applied Ergonomics, 43(3), 554–563.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Eller, N. H., Netterstrøm, B., Gyntelberg, F., Kristensen, T. S., Nielsen, F., Steptoe, A., et al. (2009). Work-related psychosocial factors and the development of ischemic heart disease: A systematic review. Cardiology in Review, 17(2), 83–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. EU-OSHA—European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2010). European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks: Managing safety and health at work. European Risk Observatory Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  22. EU-OSHA—European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2013). Priorities for OSH research in Europe: 2013–2020. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  23. Fisher, C. (2010). Happiness at work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. G7. (2015). Action for fair production, ministerial declaration. Accessed January 28, 2016.
  25. Hakanen, J., Schaufeli, W. B., & Ahola, K. (2008). The Job Demands-Resources model: A three-year cross-lagged study of burnout, depression, commitment, and work engagement. Work & Stress, 22(3), 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hansen, N., Sverke, M., & Näswall, K. (2009). Predicting nurse burnout from demands and resources in three acute care hospitals under different forms of ownership: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(1), 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hauke, A., Flintrop, J., Brun, E., & Rugulies, R. (2011). The impact of work-related psychosocial stressors on the onset of musculoskeletal disorders in specific body regions: A review and meta-analysis of 54 longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 25(3), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haukkal, E., Leino-Arjasl, P., Ojajärvil, A., Takalal, E. P., Viikari-Juntural, E., & Riihimäkil, H. (2011). Mental stress and psychosocial factors at work in relation to multiple-site musculoskeletal pain: A longitudinal study of kitchen workers. European Journal of Pain, 15(4), 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Häusser, J. A., Mojzisch, A., Niesel, M., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand-Control (-Support) model and psychological wellbeing. Work & Stress, 24(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (2006). Resilience engineering: Precepts and concepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  31. ILO. (2015). Our goal: Vision Zero. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, G7 Project Group, October 2015.—europe/—ro-geneva/—ilo-berlin/documents/genericdocument/wcms_414171.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2016.
  32. ISSA. (2016). Safety 7.0—7 Golden rules to vision zero. Accessed February 12, 2016.
  33. Johnson, J., & Hall, E. (1988). Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. American Journal of Public Health, 78(10), 1336–1342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Judge, T., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. (2011). Happiness as a societal value. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karasek, R. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karasek, R. (2008). Low social control and physiological deregulation: The stress–disequilibrium theory, towards a new demand–control model. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health Supplements, 6, 117–135.Google Scholar
  37. Kivimäki, M., Virtanen, M., Elovainio, M., Kouvonen, A., Väänänen, A., & Vahtera, J. (2006). Work stress in the etiology of coronary heart disease—A meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32, 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leka, S., & Cox, T. (2008). PRIMA-EF guidance on the European Framework for Psychosocial Risk Management: A resource for employers and worker representatives (WHO Protecting Workers’ Health series, number 9). WHO: Geneva.Google Scholar
  39. Leka, S., Cox, T., & Zwetsloot, G. (2008). The European Framework for Psychosocial Risk Management (PRIMA-EF). In S. Leka & T. Cox (Eds.), The European Framework for Psychosocial Risk Management: PRIMA-EF (pp. 1–16). Nottingham, UK: I-WHO Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Leka, S., Jain, A., Cox, T., & Kortum, E. (2011). The development of the European framework for psychosocial risk management: PRIMA-EF. Journal of Occupational Health, 53, 137–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Leka, S., Jain, A., Iavicoli, S., & Di Tecco, C. (2015—open access). An evaluation of the policy context on psychosocial risks and mental health in the workplace in the European Union: Achievements, challenges and the future. Biomed Research International, Special issue on Psychosocial Factors and Workers’ Health & Safety.
  42. Leka, S., Jain, A., & Lerouge, L. (in press). Work-related psychosocial risks: Key definitions and an overview of the policy context in Europe. In L. Lerouge (Ed.), Psychosocial risks in labour and social security law. The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(4), 309–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(1), 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 71–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Netterstrøm, B., Kristensen, T., Jensen, G., & Schnor, P. (2010). Is the demand-control model still a useful tool to assess work-related psychosocial risk for ischemic heart disease? Results from 14 year follow up in the Copenhagen City Heart study. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 23(3), 217–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Nixon, A., Mazzola, J., Bauer, J., Krueger, J., & Spector, P. (2011). Can work make you sick? A meta-analysis of the relationships between job stressors and physical symptoms. Work & Stress, 25(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rau, R., Morling, K., & Rösler, U. (2010). Is there a relationship between major depression and both objectively assessed and perceived demands and control? Work & Stress, 24(1), 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reason, J. T. (1997). Managing the risks of organisational accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  50. Roberts, K. H. (1990). Some characteristics of high-reliability organizations. Organization Science, 1, 160–177.Google Scholar
  51. Russell, J. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryff, C. (1995). Psychological wellbeing in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schulte, P., & Vainio, H. (2010). Well-being at work: Overview and perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 36(5), 422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schulte, P. A., Guerin, R. J., Schill, A. L., Bhattacharya, A., Cunningham, T. R., Pandalai, S. P., et al. (2015). Considerations for incorporating “Wellbeing” in public policy for workers and workplaces. American Journal of Public Health, 105(8), e31–e44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Singh, S. (2012). New mega trends—Implications for our future lives. Hamshire (UK), New York (US): Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Sonnentag, S. (2015). Dynamics of wellbeing. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 261–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sparks, K., Faragher, B., & Cooper, C. (2001). Wellbeing and occupational health in the 21st century workplace. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Taris, T. W., & Schreurs, P. J. (2009). Wellbeing and organizational performance: An organizational-level test of the happy-productive worker hypothesis. Work & Stress, 23(2), 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and wellbeing. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Waterman, A. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. (2007). Managing the unexpected. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  63. World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). Healthy workplaces: A model for action: For employers, workers, policy-makers and practitioners. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  64. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the Job Demands-Resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 14–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zwetsloot, G. I. J. M., Aaltonen, M., Wybo, J. L., Saari, J., Kines, P., & Op De Beeck, R. (2013). The case for research into the zero accident vision. Safety Science, 58, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zwetsloot, G. I. J. M., Kines, P., Wybo, J. L., Ruotsala, R., Drupsteen, L., & Bezemer, R. A. (2017). Zero Accident Vision based strategies in organisations: Innovative perspectives. Safety Science, 91, 260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aditya Jain
    • 1
  • Vlad Dediu
    • 2
  • Gerard Zwetsloot
    • 2
  • Stavroula Leka
    • 2
  1. 1.Nottingham University Business SchoolNottinghamUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Centre for Organizational Health & Development, School of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations