Advertisement

Case Studies Can Support Definitions of Workplace Innovation in Practice

Chapter
Part of the Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-Being book series (AHSW)

Abstract

Many practitioners find it problematic to understand and describe workplace innovation(WPI). Whereas there are well-known definitions of WPI, these remain highly abstract. We argue that, for practitioners, case examples of WPI best practices can be a valuable addition to these definitions. In this respect, based on our practical experience with WPI and the cases that resulted from the Eurofound study (Eurofound 2015), we propose the following criteria for a case to be a good example for practical purposes. First, the company that serves as a case should have implemented good workplace innovation practices that have resulted in or theoretically promise to result in positive outcomes for the organisation and for the quality of work. Second, the case description has to provide actionable information about the WPI practices. Third, the narrative of the case has to be inspiring and provide possibilities for stakeholders to identify with it. We present a number of the Eurofound cases that are informative and inspiring for practitioners while also presenting actionable information.

Keywords

Workplace innovation Cases Best practices Actionable knowledge 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors and publisher gratefully acknowledge the following permission to use the material in this book: Fietje Vaas, Rita Žiauberytė-Jakštienė & Peter Oeij, Case studies can support definitions of workplace innovation in practice. In: European Work and Organizational Psychology in Practice. Special issue on Workplace Innovation, 2017, Volume 1, 61–72.

References

  1. Argyris, C. (1996). Actionable knowledge: Design causality in the service of consequential theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(4), 390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dhondt, S., Preenen, P., Oeij, P., Corral, A., Isusi, I., Totterdill, P., et al. (2014). European company survey: Construction of the workplace innovation index and selection of companies. Leiden: TNO.Google Scholar
  3. Eurofound. (2013). Work organisation and innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  4. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2012). Review of workplace innovation and its relation with occupational safety and health. Luxembourg. https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/reports/workplace-innovation-review
  5. European Commission. (2014). Kesselring, A., Blasy, C., & Scoppetta, A. Workplace innovation: Concepts and indicators. Brussels: European Commission, DG for Enterprise and Industry.Google Scholar
  6. Gabriel, Y. (2013). Researchers as storytellers: Storytelling in organizational research. In M. Gotti & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Narratives in academic and professional genres (pp. 105–122). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  7. Oeij, P., Žiauberytė-Jakštienė, R., Dhondt, S., Corral, A., Totterdill, P., & Preenen, P. (2015a). Third European company survey: Workplace innovation in European companies. Study commissioned by Eurofound. Luxemburg: Publication Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  8. Oeij, P., Žiauberytė-Jakštienė, R., Dhondt, S., Corral, A., Totterdill, P., & Preenen, P. (2015b). Workplace innovation in European companies. Technical annex. Dublin: Eurofound. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef1540_-_technical_annex_third_european_company_survey_workplace_innovation_in_european_companies.pdf
  9. Pot, F., Dhondt, S., & Oeij, P. (2012). Social innovation of work and employment. In H.-W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, & J. Howaldt (Eds.), Challenge social innovation. Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society (pp. 261–274). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Pot, F. D. (2011). Workplace innovation for better jobs and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(4), 404–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ramstad, E. (2009). Promoting performance and the quality of working life simultaneously. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58(5), 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rappaport, J. (1995). Empowerment meets narrative: Listening to stories and creating settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 795.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Totterdill, P., & Exton, R. (2014). Defining workplace innovation: The fifth element. Strategic Direction, 30(9), 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TNO, The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific ResearchLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations