Advertisement

Creating the Bottom-up Organisation from the Top: Leaders as Enablers of Workplace Innovation

Chapter
Part of the Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-Being book series (AHSW)

Abstract

Workplace innovation enhances economic performance and quality of working life simultaneously. Yet successive surveys show that its adoption rate is slow. In many European countries there is little infrastructure to support the adoption of workplace innovation, often despite a long history of poor productivity and skills utilisation. Enterprise leadership therefore plays a critical role in determining whether or not workplace innovation practices are adopted. Three selected case studies illustrate journeys towards workplace innovation from different starting points. They demonstrate how a consistent approach to shared and distributed leadership can stimulate employee empowerment and initiative from the bottom up, as well as the cumulative impact of small incremental changes.

Keywords

Distributed leadership Workplace innovation Culture change Empowerment Employee-driven innovation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors and publisher gratefully acknowledge the following permission to use the material in this book: Peter Totterdill & Rosemary Exton, Creating the bottom-up organization from the top: Leaders as enablers of workplace innovation. In: European Work and Organizational Psychology in Practice. Special issue on Workplace Innovation, 2017, Volume 1, 73–87.

References

  1. Acas. (2015). Building productivity in the UK. London: Acas Strategy Unit.Google Scholar
  2. Buchanan, D., Addicott, R., Fitzgerald, L., Ferlie, E., & Baeza, J. (2007). Nobody in charge: Distributed change agency in healthcare. Human Relations, 60, 1065–1090. doi: 10.1177/0018726707081158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Business Decisions Ltd. (2002). New forms of work organisation: The obstacles to wider diffusion. KE-47-02-115-EN-C, DG Employment and Social Affairs, European Commission, Brussels. Retrieved from http://uk.ukwon.eu/document-store/new-forms-of-work-organisation-the-obstacles-to-wider-diffusion-final-report
  4. Caldwell, R. (2005). Agency and change: Rethinking change agency in organizations. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. CEDEFOP. (2015). Matching skills and jobs in Europe: Insights from Cedefop’s European skills and jobs survey. Retrieved January 3, 2016 from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/publications/8088
  6. Eurofound. (1997). Employee participation and organisational change. EPOC survey of 6000 workplaces in Europe. Dublin: European Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Eurofound. (2012). 5th European working conditions survey. Overview report. Dublin: Eurofound.Google Scholar
  8. Eurofound. (2015a). Kankaraš, M., & van Houten, G. Third European company survey 2013—Overview report. Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  9. Eurofound. (2015b). Oeij, P., Žiauberytė-Jakštienė, R., Dhondt, S., Corral, A., Totterdill, P., & Preenen, P. Workplace innovation in European companies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  10. Godard, J. (2004). A critical assessment of the high-performance paradigm. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(2), 349–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2004.00318.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423–451. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gustavsen, B. (1992). Dialogue and development. Maastricht: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hardy, C., & Leiba-O’Sullivan, S. (1998). The power behind empowerment: Implications for research and practice. Human Relations, 51, 451. doi: 10.1177/001872679805100402 Google Scholar
  15. Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 171–188. doi: 10.2307/257025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khurana, R. (2002). The curse of the superstar CEO. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 60–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. LLAKES. (2012). Skills and employment survey. Retrieved January 3, 2016 from www.llakes.org.
  18. Mulvad Reksten, P., & Dragsbæk, P. (2014). How trade unions can stimulate, resource and sustain workplace innovation. Experiences from Denmark. EUWIN Bulletin. Retrieved June from http://uk.ukwon.eu/tu-in-wi-denmark
  19. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. (2015). Workplace policy and management practices to improve the health and wellbeing of employees. NICE Guideline NG13. London: NICE.Google Scholar
  20. OECD. (2010). Innovative workplaces: Making better use of skills within organisations. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Oliver, A. (2012). Mike Putnam: Recession riding. New Civil Engineer. Retrieved from http://www.newcivilengineer.com/mike-putnam-recession-riding/8627486.fullarticle
  22. Pot, F. (2011). Workplace innovation for better jobs and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(4), 404–415. doi: 10.1108/17410401111123562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pot, F., Totterdill, P., & Dhondt, S. (2016). Workplace innovation: European policy and theoretical foundations. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 13–32. doi: 10.1504/WREMSD.2016.073428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramstad, E. (2009). Promoting performance and the quality of working life simultaneously. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58(5), 423–436. doi: 10.1108/17410400910965706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Century Business.Google Scholar
  26. Storey, J., & Holti, R. (2013). Towards a new model of leadership for the NHS. London: NHS Leadership Academy.Google Scholar
  27. Teague, P. (2005). What is enterprise partnership? Organization, 12, 567. doi: 10.1177/1350508405052759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Totterdill, P. (2015). Closing the gap: The fifth element and workplace innovation. European Journal of Workplace Innovation, 1(1). Retrieved from http://journal.uia.no/index.php/EJWI/article/view/166
  29. Totterdill, P. (2016). Innovative workplaces: Enhancing skills utilisation through workplace innovation. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  30. Totterdill, P., Dhondt, S., & Milsome, S. (2002). Partners at work? A report to Europe’s policy makers and social partners. Nottingham: The Work Institute. Retrieved from http://uk.ukwon.eu/document-store/partners-at-work
  31. Totterdill, P., Exton, O., Exton, R., & Gold, M. (2016). High-performance work practices in Europe: Challenges of diffusion. European Journal of Workplace Innovation, 2(1). Retrieved from http://journal.uia.no/index.php/EJWI
  32. Totterdill, P., Exton, O., Exton, R., & Sherrin, J. (2009). Workplace innovation in European Countries. Report to KOWIN (Korean Ministry of Labour). Nottingham: UKWON. Retrieved from http://uk.ukwon.eu/document-store/workplace-innovation-policies-in-european-countries
  33. UKCES. (2009). High performance working: Developing a survey tool. Evidence Report 5. Wath-on-Dearne: UK Commission for Employment and Skills.Google Scholar
  34. Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1988). The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Wright, J., & Sissons, P. (2012). The skills dilemma: Skills utilisation and low-wage work. London: The Work Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Workplace Innovation Europe CLGDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations