Implementing Workplace Innovation Across Europe: Why, How and What?
This chapter discusses the implementation of workplace innovation (WPI) in European companies. Based on a 51-case study research in 10 EU Member States this chapter addresses four questions: (1) Why do companies apply workplace innovation; (2) What are different motives for management, employees and employee representatives to implement WPI; (3) What are important leverage factors for the implementation of WPI; and (4) What is known about the (expected) effects according to management, employees and employee representatives? Results show that successful WPI is an interplay of management-driven business goals and employee-driven quality of work goals. Companies differ in their implementing strategies but constructive cooperation between management and employees is a key success factor for successful WPI.
KeywordsWorkplace innovation Implementation European Union European Company Survey
The authors and publisher gratefully acknowledge the following permission to use the material in this book: Peter Oeij, Steven Dhondt, Rita Žiauberytė-Jakštienė, Antonio Corral & Paul Preenen, Implementing workplace innovation across Europe: Why, how and what? In: European Work and Organizational Psychology in Practice. Special issue on Workplace Innovation, 2017, Volume 1, 46–60.
- Achterbergh, J., & Vriens, D. (2010). Organizations. Social systems conducting experiments (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Christis, J. H. P. (2010). Organization and job design: What is smart organizing? In H. A. M. van Lieshout, L. Polstra, J. H. P. Christis, & B. J. M. Emans (Eds.), Management of labour. Societal and managerial perspectives (pp. 39–71). Groningen: Hanzehogeschool Groningen University of Applied Sciences.Google Scholar
- de Sitter, L. U., den Hertog, J. F., & Dankbaar, B. (1997). From complex organizations with simple jobs to simple organizations with complex jobs. Human Relations, 50(6), 497–534.Google Scholar
- Dhondt, S. & Oeij, P. R. A. (2014, September). Social innovation related to innovation in management studies. In J. Howaldt, A. Butzin, D. Domanski, & C. Kaletka (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to social innovation—A critical literature review (pp. 122–150). Dortmund: SI-Drive [EU Seventh Framework Programme]. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/socialinnovationeurope/en/magazine/methods-and-tools/articles-reports/theoretical-approaches-social-innovation
- Dhondt, S., Oeij, P. R. A., & Preenen, P. T. Y. (2015). Working in the digitalized world: The meaning of the link between advanced manufacturing and workplace innovation in the EU growth strategy. In C. M. Schlick (Ed.), Arbeit in der digitalisierten Welt (pp. 155–170). Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
- Dhondt, S., Preenen, P. T. Y., Oeij, P. R. A., Corral, A., Isusi, I., & Totterdill, P. (2014b, February). European company survey: construction of the workplace innovation index and selection of companies. Leiden: TNO.Google Scholar
- Dhondt, S., & van Hootegem, G. (2015). Reshaping workplaces: Workplace innovation as designed by scientists and practitioners. European Journal of Workplace Innovation, 1(1), 17–25.Google Scholar
- Eeckelaert, L., Dhondt, S., Oeij, P. R. A., Pot, F., Nicolescu, G. I., Webster, J., et al. (2012). Review of workplace innovation and its relation with occupational safety and health: Literature review. Bilbao: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.Google Scholar
- Eurofound (2015), Kankaraš, M., & van Houten, G. Third European company survey 2013—Overview report: Workplace practices—Patterns, performance and well-being. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
- Kalmi, P., & Kauhanen, A. (2008). Workplace innovations and employee outcomes: Evidence from Finland. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 47(3), 430–459.Google Scholar
- Karanika-Murray, M. & Oeij, P. R. A. (2017). How can work and organizational psychology fortify the practice of workplace innovation?—Chapter 20 in this book.Google Scholar
- Oeij, P. R. A., de Looze, M., ten Have, K., van Rhijn, G., & de Graaf, B. (2012). From productivity strategy to business case: Choosing a cost-effective intervention for workplace innovations. JCC: The Business and Economics Research Journal, 5(2), 171–184.Google Scholar
- Oeij, P. R. A., Wiezer, N. M., Elo, A.-L., Nielsen, K., Vega, S., Wetzstein, A., et al. (2006). Combating psychosocial risks in work organisations: Some European practices. In S. McIntyre & J. Houdmont (Eds.), Occupational health psychology: European perspectives on research, education and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 233–263). Maia, Portugal: ISMAI Publishing.Google Scholar
- Oeij, P. R. A., Žiauberytė-Jakštienė, R., Dhondt, S., Corral, A., Totterdill, P., & Preenen, P. T. Y. (2015a). workplace innovation in European companies. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Study commissioned by Eurofound.Google Scholar
- Oeij, P. R. A., Žiauberytė-Jakštienė, R., Dhondt, S., Corral, A., Totterdill, P., & Preenen, P. T. Y. (2015b). Workplace innovation in European companies. Technical annex. Dublin: Eurofound. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef1540_-_technical_annex_-_third_european_company_survey_workplace_innovation_in_european_companies.pdf
- Preenen, P. T. Y., Vergeer, R. A., Kraan, K. O., & Dhondt, S. (2015). Labour productivity and innovation performance: The importance of internal labour flexibility practices. Economic and Industrial Democracy. Advance online publication, March 24, 2015.Google Scholar
- Pot, F. D., Dhondt, S., & Oeij, P. R. A. (2012). Social innovation of work and employment. In H.-W. Franz & J. Hochgerner (Eds.), Challenge social innovation (pp. 261–274). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar