Gulliver’s Travels: Silly, Silly Stories

  • Karen Bloom GevirtzEmail author


This chapter analyzes Gulliver’s Travels (2010) to demonstrate how twenty-first century adaptors and writers recognize the artificial nature of “history” and ideology’s role in creating it. Starring Jack Black, this adaptation of Jonathan Swift’s novel displays history as a malleable narrative whose impact on the present is direct and profound, and consequently both potentially liberating or potentially destructive. The discussion focuses on several aspects of the film: its use of various forms of history to establish the idea that it is an infinitely renewable narrative; its recognition of the original novel, and cultural texts more broadly, as a culturally valuable historical artefact; and its use of space to create history, including its own narrative of the role of history and text.


Adaptation theory Film adaptation Gulliver’s Travels Jack Black Eighteenth-century adaptation 


  1. Benedict, Barbara M. 2012. Collecting Trouble: Sir Hans Sloane’s Literary Reputation in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Eighteenth-Century Life 36 (2) (Spring 2012): 111–142.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bowles, Scott. 2010. Films Naughty or Nice? USA Today, November 5.Google Scholar
  4. Brunsdon, Charlotte. 1990. Problems with Quality. Screen 31 (1): 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cartmell, Deborah, and I.Q. Hunter. 2001. Introduction: Retrovisions: Historical Makeovers in Film and Literature. In Retrovisions: Reinventing the Past in Film and Fiction, ed. Deborah Cartmell, I.Q. Hunter, and Imelda Whelehan, 1–7. London: Sterling Press.Google Scholar
  6. Elliott, Kamilla. 2014. Rethinking Formal-Cultural and Textual-Contextual Divides in Adaptation Studies. Literature/Film Quarterly 42 (4): 576–593.Google Scholar
  7. Favret, Mary. 2000. Being True to Jane Austen. In Victorian Afterlives: Postmodern Culture Rewrites the Nineteenth Century, ed. Dianne F. Sadoff and John Kucich, 64–82. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Geraghty, Christine. 2008. Now a Major Motion Picture: Film Adaptations of Literature and Drama. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Gire, Dann. 2010. Giant Waste. Chicago Daily Herald, December 24.Google Scholar
  10. Groen, Rick. 2010. Jack Black Aside, This Gulliver is Worth Sizing Up. The Globe and Mail, December 24.Google Scholar
  11. Guillory, John. 1993. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gulliver’s Travels. 1996. Adapted by Simon Moore from the novel by Jonathan Swift. Directed by Charles Sturridge. New York: NBC.Google Scholar
  13. Gulliver’s Travels. 2010. Adapted by Joe Stillman and Nicholas Stoller from the novel by Jonathan Swift. Beverly Hills, CA: Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment.Google Scholar
  14. Hutcheon, Linda. 2006. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Knight, Chris. 2010. This Gulliver is None Too Swift. The Gazette, December 24.Google Scholar
  16. Landy, Marcia. 1996. Cinematic Uses of the Past. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lim, Christopher. 2011. Gulliver’s Travails. The Business Times Singapore, August 5.Google Scholar
  18. Monk, Claire. 1995. The British ‘Heritage Film’ and its Critics. Critical Survey 7 (2): 116–124.
  19. Monk, Claire. 2011. Heritage Film Audiences: Period Films and Contemporary Audiences in the UK. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. PDF e-book.Google Scholar
  20. Mullaney, Stephen. 1983. Strange Things, Gross Terms, Curious Customs; The Rehearsal of Cultures in the Late Renaissance. Representations No. 3 (Summer 1983): 40–67. doi: 10.2307/3043786.
  21. Osmond, Andrew. 2011. Gulliver’s Travels. Sight & Sound 23 (1): 58.Google Scholar
  22. Sadoff, Dianne F., and John Kucich. 2000. Introduction: Histories of the Present. In Victorian Afterlives: Postmodern Culture Rewrites the Nineteenth Century, ed. Dianne F. Sadoff and John Kucich, ix–xxx. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. PDF e-book.Google Scholar
  23. Scott, A.O. 2010. A Gut Visible All the Way from the 18th Century. The New York Times, December 23.Google Scholar
  24. Slethaug, Gordon E. 2014. Adaptation Theory and Criticism: Postmodern Literature and Criticism in the USA. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  25. Sloboda, Stacey. 2010. Displaying Materials: Porcelain and Natural History in the Duchess of Portland’s Museum. ECS 43 (4) (Summer 2010): 455–472.Google Scholar
  26. Stewart, Susan. 1984. On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Swift, Jonathan. 2002. Gulliver’s Travels, ed. Albert J. Rivero. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Thomas, Sophie. 2009. ‘Things on Holiday’: Collections, Museums, and the Poetics of Unruliness. European Romantic Review 20 (2): 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishSeton Hall UniversitySouth OrangeUSA

Personalised recommendations