Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to explore the different healthcare systems operating globally in terms of the constraints within which they operate and the principles and values which underpin them. The chapter will also review how healthcare systems are predominantly defined by cost, quality and safety. While the principles of these healthcare systems are often espoused to and resonate with the public’s passion for their healthcare system, the values are often absent in contemporary debate. Regardless of the healthcare context there is a consensus that healthcare system have to change in order to improve [1–3] as variation in outcomes continues to be seen within and between countries [4]. Improvements in healthcare are more likely to succeed when led by clinicians rather than managers [3] and must be undertaken in partnership with patients, families [5, 6] and local communities [7]. In 2011 Sweden enacted a new patient safety law which offers everyone affected by healthcare—patients, consumers and health workers the opportunity to influence the health care system. This Swedish initiative should inspire those operating health care systems globally to strive to improve patient safety.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Berwick D, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health and cost: the remaining barriers to integrated care are not technical; they are political. Health Aff. 2008;27(3):759–69.
Øvretveit J. Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research. Qual Saf Healhcare. 2010;19:490–2.
Øvretveit J, Andreen-Sachs M, Carlsson J, Gustafsson H, Hansson J, Keller C, Lofgren S, Mazzocato P, Tolf S, Brommels M. Implementing organisation and management innovations in Swedish healthcare: lessons from a comparison of 12 cases. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(2):237–57.
Kossarova L, Blunt I, Bradsley M. Quality watch, focus on: international comparisons of healthcare quality, what can the UK learn? London: The Health Foundation and Nuffield Trust; 2015.
Darzi A. High quality care for all. London: Department of Health; 2008.
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Achieving the vision of excellence in quality: recommendations for the English NHS system of quality improvement. 2008.
World Health Organisation. Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2006.
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. 2001.
Mosadeghrad AM. A conceptual framework for quality of care. Mat Soc Med. 2012;4:251–61.
Maxwell RJ. Dimensions of quality revisited: from thought to action. Qual Health Care. 1992;1:171–7.
Taylor SL, Dy S, Foy R, et al. What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions? BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:611–7.
Pronovost P, Sexton B. Assessing safety culture: guidelines and recommendations. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:231–3.
Porter M, Lee T. The strategy that will fix healthcare. Harv Bus Rev. 2013;91(12):24.
Lewis R, Edwards N. Improving length of stay: what can hospitals do? London: Nuffield Trust; 2015. www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk.
Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? J Am Med Assoc. 1988;260(12):1743–8.
Øvretveit J. Health service quality: an introduction to quality methods for health services. Oxford: Blackwell; 1992.
Martin GP, McKee L, Dixon Woods M. Beyond metrics? Utlising ‘soft intelligence’ for healthcare quality and safety. Soc Sci Med. 2015;142:19–26.
Manchester Patient Safety Framework. http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?entryid45=59796.
Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust. Public inquiry—chaired by Robert Francis QC. Final report. 3 volumes. 2013. www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/report.
http://www.akumen.co.uk/wp-content/resources/measuring_whats_important.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burke, D., Aylott, J., Godbole, P. (2017). The Challenge of Context. In: Godbole, P., Burke, D., Aylott, J. (eds) Why Hospitals Fail. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56224-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56224-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56223-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56224-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)