Access to Citizenship and the Role of Origin Countries

  • Maarten Peter Vink
  • Tijana Prokic-Breuer
  • Jaap Dronkers
Part of the Global Migration Issues book series (IOMS, volume 7)


For foreign-born residents and their children, attaining citizenship in the host country confers membership, rights and participation opportunities, and encourages a sense of belonging (Bloemraad 2006). From a destination country perspective, naturalisation is increasingly seen as an important part of the process of integrating immigrants. In order to optimise the use of what is sometimes termed the ‘citizenship premium’, actors in destination countries often advocate public policies that are aimed at increasing naturalisation rates among immigrants (OECD 2011; Sumption and Flamm 2012). The acquisition of citizenship is associated with better employment probability, higher earnings and higher occupational positions (Liebig and Von Haaren 2011). Politically, in a democratic context, citizenship normally qualifies immigrants to take an active part in the electoral politics of the destination country (Pikkov 2011; De Rooij 2012).


Destination Country Origin Country Foreign Citizenship Dual Citizenship Immigrant Integration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The contribution by Maarten Vink to this chapter is financed by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 682626).


  1. ACIDI. (2011). Ucranianos em Portugal: Uma Comunidade para Ficar? ACIDI Revista 89. Available at Accessed 12 Apr 2013.
  2. Bauböck, R., & Faist, T. (Eds.). (2010). Diaspora and transnationalism: Concepts, theories and methods. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bauböck, R., Ersbøll, E., Groenendijk, K., & Waldrauch, H. (Eds.). (2006). Acquisition and loss of nationality. Policies and trends in 15 European states (Vols. 1 & 2). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bevelander, P., & Pendakur, R. (2012). Citizenship, co-ethnic populations, and employment probabilities of immigrants in Sweden. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 13(2), 203–222.Google Scholar
  5. Bevelander, P., & Helgertz, J. (2014, March). The influence of partner choice and country of origin characteristics on the naturalization of immigrants in Sweden: A longitudinal analysis. Paper presented at the CES conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Bloemraad, I. (2002). The north American naturalization gap: An institutional approach to citizenship acquisition in the United States and Canada. International Migration Review, 36(1), 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloemraad, I. (2006). Becoming a citizen: Incorporating immigrants and refugees in the United States and Canada. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bratsberg, B., Ragan, J. F., & Nasir, Z. M. (2002). The effect of naturalization on wage growth: A panel study of young male immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics, 20, 568–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brubaker, R. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bueker, C. S. (2005). Political incorporation among immigrants from ten areas of origin: The persistence of source country effects. International Migration Review, 39(1), 103–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiswick, B. (1978). The effect of Americanization on the earnings of foreign-born men. The Journal of Political Economy, 86, 897–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiswick, B. R., & Miller, P. W. (2008). Citizenship in the United States: The roles of immigrant characteristics and country of origin (IZA Discussion Paper 3596). Accessed 21 July 2016.
  13. Dagevos, J. (2008). Dubbele nationaliteit en integratie [Dual nationality and integration]. Den Haag: ACVZ.Google Scholar
  14. De Rooij, E. A. (2012). Patterns of immigrant political participation: Explaining differences in types of political participation between immigrants and the majority population in Western Europe. European Sociological Review, 28(4), 455–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeVoretz, D., & Pivnenko, S. (2004). The economic causes and consequences of Canadian citizenship. Journal of Immigration and Integration, 6(3–4), 435–468.Google Scholar
  16. Dronkers, J., & Vink, M. P. (2012). Explaining access to citizenship in Europe: How policies affect naturalisation rates. European Union Politics, 13(3), 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ersanilli, E., & Koopmans, R. (2010). Rewarding integration? Citizenship regulations and the socio-cultural integration of immigrants in the Netherlands, France and Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(5), 773–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. EUDO CITIZENSHIP. (2013a). Citizenship; Nationality. In: EUDO Glossary on citizenship and nationality. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  19. EUDO CITIZENSHIP. (2013b). Access to citizenship and its impact on immigrant integration: Handbook for Portugal. Available at Accessed 21 July 2016.
  20. EUROSTAT. (2015). Acquisition of citizenship statistics. Accessed at 26 Sept 2015.
  21. Faist, T. (Ed.). (2007). Dual citizenship in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  22. Faist, T., & Kivisto, P. (Eds.). (2007). Dual citizenship in global perspective, from unitary to multiple citizenship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Fitzgerald, D. (2008). A nation of emigrants: How Mexico manages its migration. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Goodman, S. (2010). Naturalisation policies in Europe: Exploring patterns of inclusion and exclusion, comparative report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-Comp. 2010/7. San Domenico di Fiesole: EUDO Citizenship Observatory.Google Scholar
  25. Gordon, M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion, and national origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gugushvili, A. (2012). Report on Georgia. EUDO CITIZENSHIP, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2012/3. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  27. Hailbronner, K. (2006). Nationality in Public International Law and European Law. In R. Bauböck, E. Ersbøll, K. Groenendijk, & H. Waldrauch (Eds.), Acquisition and loss of nationality, policies and trends in 15 European states: Comparative analyses (Vol. 1, pp. 35–104). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Janoski, T. (2010). The ironies of citizenship: naturalisation and integration in industrialized countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jasso, G., & Rosenzweig, M. (1986). Family reunification and the immigration multiplier: U.S. immigration law, origin-country conditions, and the reproduction of immigrants. Demography, 23(3), 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones-Correa, M. (2001). Under two flags: Dual nationality in Latin America and its consequences for naturalisation in the United States. International Migration Review, 35(4), 997–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liebig, T., & Von Haaren, F. (2011). Citizenship and the socioeconomic integration of immigrants and their children. In OECD (Ed.), Naturalisation: A passport for the better integration of immigrants? (pp. 23–57). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  32. Logan, J. R., Sookhee, O., & Darrah, J. (2012). The political and community context of immigrant naturalisation in the United States. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(4), 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Makaryan, S. (2013). Report on Armenia. EUDO CITIZENSHIP, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2013/17. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  34. Mazzolari, F. (2009). Dual citizenship rights: Do they make more and richer citizens? Demography, 46(1), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Naujoks, D. (2013). Migration, citizenship, and development: Diasporic membership policies and overseas Indians in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. North, D. S. (1987). The long grey welcome: A study of the American naturalization process. International Migration Review, 21(2), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. OECD. (2011). Naturalisation: A passport for the better integration of immigrants? Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  38. Penninx, R. (2003). Integration: The role of communities, Institutions, and the State. Migration Information Source, October 2003. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  39. Peters, F., & Vink, M. (2016 Forthcoming). Naturalization and the socio-economic integration of immigrants: A life-course perspective. In G. Freeman & Mirilovic, N. (Eds), Handbook on migration and social policy. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  40. Peters, F., Vink, M., & Schmeets, H. (2015, Forthcoming). The ecology of immigrant naturalization: A life course approach in the context of institutional conditions. Paper under review (resubmitted with minor revision).Google Scholar
  41. Picot, G., & Hou, F. (2011). Divergent trends in citizenship rates among immigrants in Canada and the United States. In OECD (Ed.), Naturalisation: A passport for the better integration of immigrants? (pp. 154–183). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  42. Pikkov, D. (2011). The practice of voting: Immigrant turnout, the persistence of origin effects, and the nature, formation and transmission of political habit. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
  43. Portes, A., & Curtis, J. W. (1987). Changing flags: Naturalization and its determinants among mexican immigrants. International Migration Review, 21(2), 352–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530, 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E., & Landolt, P. (1999). The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 217–237.Google Scholar
  46. Rallu, J. L. (2011). Naturalization policies in France and the USA and their impact on migrants’ characteristics and strategies. Population Review, 50(1).Google Scholar
  47. Schmeets, H., & Vink, M. (2011). Opvattingen over dubbele nationaliteit en de minderhedenproblematiek [‘Attitudes towards dual citizenship and minority issues’]. In H. Schmeets (Ed.), Verkiezingen: Participatie, Vertrouwen en Integratie (pp. 102–116). Den Haag/Heerlen: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar
  48. Scott, K. (2008). The economics of citizenship: Is there a naturalization effect? In P. Bevelander & D. J. DeVoretz (Eds.), The economics of citizenship (pp. 105–126). Malmö: Holmbergs MIM/Malmö University.Google Scholar
  49. Shevel, O. (2010). Report on Ukraine. EUDO CITIZENSHIP, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2010/38. Available at Accessed 21 July 2016.
  50. Spiro, P. (2007). Dual citizenship: A postnational view. In T. Faist & P. Kivisto (Eds.), Dual citizenship in global perspective (pp. 189–202). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  51. Staton, J. K., Jackson, R., & Canache, D. (2007). Dual nationality among latinos: What are the implications for political connectedness? Journal of Politics, 69, 470–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steinhardt, M. F. (2012). Does citizenship matter? The economic impact of naturalizations in Germany. Labour Economics, 19, 813–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sumption, M., & Flamm, S. (2012). The economic value of citizenship for immigrants in the United States. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  54. Tucci, N. (2011). National context and logic of social distancing: Children of immigrants in France and Germany. In M. Wingens, M. Windzio, H. de Valk, & C. Aybek (Eds.), A life-course perspective on migration and integration (pp. 143–164). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. United Nations. (2013). World population policies 2011. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  56. Van Oers, R., De Hart, B., & Groenendijk, K. (2006). The Netherlands. In R. Bauböck, E. Ersbøll, K. Groenendijk, & H. Waldrauch (Eds.), Acquisition and loss of nationality, policies and trends in 15 European states: Country analyses (Vol. 2, pp. 391–434). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Vink, M., & De Groot, G. (2010). Citizenship attribution in Western Europe: International framework and domestic trends. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(5), 713–734.Google Scholar
  58. Vink, M.P., & de Groot, G.-R. (2016 Forthcoming). Citizenship policies in the European Union: International framework and domestic trends. In D. Besharov, & Lopez, M. (Eds.) Adjusting to a world in motion: Trends in migration and migration policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Vink, M., Prokic-Breuer, T., & Dronkers, J. (2013). Immigrant naturalization in the context of institutional diversity: Policy matters, but to whom? International Migration, 51(5), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vink, M. P., De Groot, G.-R., & Luk, N. C. (2015). MACIMIDE global expatriate dual citizenship dataset., Harvard Dataverse, V1 [updated until 1 January 2013].
  61. Vonk, O. (2012). Dual Nationality in the European Union. A study on changing norms in public and private international law and in the municipal laws of four EU member states. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  62. Weil, P. (2002). Qu’est-ce qu’un Français: Histoire de la nationalité française depuis la Révolution. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
  63. White, M., Biddlecom, A., & Guo, S. (1993). Immigration, naturalization, and residential assimilation among Asian Americans in 1980. Social Forces, 72(1), 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yang, P. Q. (1994). Explaining immigrant naturalization. International Migration Review, 28(3), 449–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhou, M. (1997). Segmented assimilation: Issues, controversies, and recent research on the new second generation. International Migration Review, 31(4), 975–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maarten Peter Vink
    • 1
  • Tijana Prokic-Breuer
    • 2
  • Jaap Dronkers
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations