Coercion by Necessity or Comprehensive Responsibility? Hannah Arendt on Vulnerability, Freedom and Education

  • Sharon RiderEmail author
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 89)


Hannah Arendt is sometimes read as reserving the prerequisites and perquisites of genuine action to an elite. This is largely a misunderstanding. I propose a reading of Hannah Arendt’s collection of essays, Between Past and Future, as a coherent argument that might be characterized as a kind of phenomenological description of Bildung, understood not as private selfrealization but in the public and shared sense, as the vocation of being human, or rather, of achieving humanity. Arendt invites us to see formal education as an “institution of truth”. To bring this aspect to light, the paper first rehearses the salient points in Arendt’s argument in Between Past and Future, together with relevant forays into the Kantian context of practical philosophy which she takes as her starting point on certain fundamental points. In the second part, a number of changes in ideas about thinking, learning and judging which have both contributed to and been exacerbated by the massification, marketization, mediatization and juridification of culture and learning, are analyzed in light of Arendt’s understanding of what it means to be human.


Mass Culture Public Realm Political Realm Common World Modern Thought 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1968. Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1992a. Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1992b. Postscriptum to thinking. In Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy, ed. Ronald Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1994. We refugees. In Altogether elsewhere: Writers in exile, ed. Marc Robinson, 111–119. Boston: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1998. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aristotle. 1941. Economics & Politics. In The basic works of Aristotle, ed. Richard McKeon. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. Beiner, Ronald. 1992. Notes to Hannah Arendt. In Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, John. 1944. Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Donoghue, Frank. 2008. The last professors: The corporate university and the fate of the humanities. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Heidegger, Martin, and Eugene T. Gendlin. 1985. What is a thing?(Repr.). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  11. Kant, Immanuel. 1898 [1788]. Critique of practical reason. Trans. T.K. Abbot. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1951 [1790]. Critique of judgment. Trans. J.H. Bernard. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1963 [1781]. Critique of pure reason. Trans. N. K. Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1979. Conflict of the faculties. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1996. Answer to the question: What is enlightenment? In What is enlightenment? Eigteenth-century answers and twentieth-century questions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2001. What does it mean to orient oneself in thinking? In Religion and rational theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Locke, John. 1909–1914. Some thoughts concerning education, Vol. XXXVII, Part 1, The Harvard classics. New York: P.F. Collier & Son.Google Scholar
  18. McCarthy, Mary. 1978. Editor’s postface. In The life of the mind, ed. Hannah Arendt. New York: Harvest.Google Scholar
  19. Readings, Bill. 1996. The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
  20. Rider, Sharon. 2015. Human freedom and the philosophical attitude. Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (11): 1185–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosen, Stanley. 1989. A central ambiguity in descartes. In The ancients and the moderns: Rethinking modernity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Taminiaux, Jacques. 1985. Dialectic and difference. In Dialectic and difference. Finitude in modern thought. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 1992. La fille de Thrace et le penseur professionell. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  24. Weber, Max. 1946. Science as a vocation. In Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations