Advertisement

Phronêsis and the Ideal of Beauty

  • Danielle LoriesEmail author
Chapter
  • 200 Downloads
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 89)

Abstract

In a number of studies, Jacques Taminiaux focuses on the Aristotelian concepts of bios politikos and phronêsis, that is, the intellectual excellence in the domain of praxis. Here I would like to address in particular his insightful and textually close commentary on Hannah Arendt’s essay entitled: “The Crisis in Culture: Its Social and Political Significance,” Chapter VI of Between Past and Future. There Taminiaux insists on the joint and finely articulated roles of the Ancients—Pericles, Aristotle, and Cicero—and of Kant in the development of Arendt’s notion of judgment. At my own risk, my present task involves exploring the possibility of deepening the Arendtian rapprochements between Aristotelian phronêsis and the Kantian judgment of taste, which, among other things, is the object of Taminiaux’s analysis.

Keywords

Supra Note Ethical Virtue Practical Wisdom Aesthetic Judgment Reflective Judgment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1977 [1961]. The crisis in culture: Its social and its political significance. In Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought, chapter VI. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. 2014. Nichomachean Ethics. Translated with introduction and notes by C.D.C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  3. Bodéüs, Richard. 1990. L’imagination au pouvoir. Dialogue XXIX: 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and ed. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. ed. Paul Guyer, Trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (“CJ” refers to Kant (2000), “Ak” refers as usual to the German reference edition, the ‘Academy Edition’).Google Scholar
  6. Nussbaum, Martha. 1978. Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Rodrigo, Pierre. 1995. Aristote, l’eidétique et la phénoménologie. Grenoble: Millon.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2006. Aristote. Une philosophie pratique: Praxis, politique et bonheur. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  9. Taminiaux, Jacques. 2008. Phronêsis, cultura animi et jugement réfléchissant. Remarques sur Hannah Arendt. In Le jugement pratique. Autour de la notion de phronêsis, ed. D. Lories and L. Rizzerio, 333–348. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2009. Maillons herméneutiques. Études de poétique, de politique et de phénoménologie. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor of PhilosophyUniversité Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations