Intuition and Unanimity. From the Platonic Bias to the Phenomenology of the Political

  • Fabio CiaramelliEmail author
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 89)


My homage to Jacques Taminiaux aims to show the fecundity of his investigations on the theoretical privilege of intuition, by pointing out the political implications of the “seduction of unanimity”. The latter implies a deep depreciating of multiplicity of opinions, and consequently a virtual destruction of political space. The internal link between immediacy and unanimity implies the short-circuit between inter-locution and inter-action in favor of the purported objectivity and universality of theoria, retained capable of seizing, in its solitary gaze, the truth of Being. I would like to suggest that the drift to unanimous solutions in social field and political questions finds its unconcealed reason in the ontological paradigm of an ideal truth directly delivered to the solitude of a philosophical gaze. I will defend such a view by developing a critical reading of a classical text in political philosophy: the Discourse of Voluntary Servitude by Etienne de La Boétie.


Political Implication Political Space Universal Truth Intellectual Intuition Singular Individual 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abensour, Miguel. 2014. La communauté politique des “tous uns”. Entretiens avec Michel Enaudeau. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1978a. The life of the mind. Vol. 1: Thinking. San Diego/New York/London: Harcourt Inc.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1978b. The life of the mind. Vol. 2: Willing. San Diego/New York/London: Harcourt Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Benedict XVI, pope. 2006. Faith, reason and the University Memories and Reflections. Lecture of the Holy Father. Aula Magna of the University of Regensburg. Tuesday, 12 September 2006.
  6. Ciaramelli, Fabio. 2001. Friendship and desire. Free Associations 8 (3 47): 368–389.Google Scholar
  7. de La Boétie, Etienne. 2002. Discours de la servitude volontaire. Texte établi et annoté par A. et L. Tournon. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2008. The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude. Trans. H. Kurz. Auburng: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  9. de Martino, Ernesto. 1977. La fine del mondo. Contributo all’analisi delle apocalissi culturali. Edited by C. Gallini. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrari, Fabrizio M. 2014. Ernesto de Martino on religion: The crisis and the presence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Lefort, Claude. 1978. Le Nom d’Un. In de E. La Boétie. Discours de la servitude volontaire. Texte établi par P. Léonard, 247–307. Suivi de La Boétie et la question du politique. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1988. Democracy and Political Theory. Trans. D. Macey. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nussbaum, Martha. 1986. The fragility of goodness. Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rothbard, Murray N. 2008. Introduction: The political thought of Etienne de La Boétie. In de La Boétie 2008: 7–37.Google Scholar
  15. Talmon, Jacob. 1960. The origins of totalitarian democracy. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
  16. Taminiaux, Jacques. 1967. La nostalgie de la Grèce à l’aube de l’idéalisme allemande. La Haye: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1976. Système de la vie éthique. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1977a. Discours du Professeur Jacques Taminiaux. Remise solennelle du Prix Francqui par Sa Majesté Le Roi Badouin à la Fondation Universitaire le 1er juin 1977.
  19. ———. 1977b. Remarques sur Heidegger et les “Recherches logiques” de Husserl. In Le regard et l’excédant, 156–182. La Haye: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 1982. Recoupements. Bruxelles: Ousia.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1984. Naissance de la philosophie hégélienne de l’État. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1985a. Dialectic and Difference: Finitude in Modern Thought. Trans. R. Crease and J. Decker. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1985b. Arendt, disciple de Heidegger? Études Phénoménologiques 2: 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 1989. Lecture de l’ontologie fondamentale. Essais sur Heidegger. Grenoble: Millon.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1991. Heidegger and the Project of Fundamental Ontology. Trans. M. Gendre. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press (or. ed. Taminiaux 1989).Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1992. La fille de Thrace et le penseur professionnel. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 1993a. The Hegelian legacy in Heidegger’s overcoming of aesthetics. In Taminiaux 1993b, 127–152.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1993b. Poetics, Speculation, and Judgment. Trans. M. Gendre. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 1995. Le théâtre des philosophes: la tragédie, l’être, l’action. Grenoble: Millon.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 1997. The Thracian Maid and the Professional Thinker. Arendt and Heidegger. Trans. M. Gendre. Albany: State University of New York Press (or. ed. Taminiaux 1992).Google Scholar
  31. ———. 2005. Art et événement. Spéculation et jugement des Grecs à Heidegger. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2007. The platonic roots of Heidegger’s political thought. European Journal of Political Theory 6 (1): 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tilliette, Xavier. 2005. L’intuition intellectuelle de Kant à Hegel. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy of LawUniversità “Federico II”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations