Symbols and Politics

  • Paul BrunoEmail author
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 89)


“We will talk about speculation and judgment.” These are the words uttered in my mind’s ear with the sonorous whisper of his French-Belgian accent that came to mind when I thought of writing something in honor of Professor Jacques Taminiaux. It was common for him to begin class with such an introduction coupled with the forewarning that our discussion must inevitably be “provisional.” Mining the history of philosophy requires of our attempt a willingness to continually ask the questions that preceded the questions that preceded the questions. It may well be that the history of philosophy is, as Whitehead averred, a footnote to Plato, but as Taminiaux knew well, Plato’s philosophizing was always “in the shadow of the work of art.” Indeed, it was Taminiaux’s approach to philosophizing that inspired my attempt—humble and provisional to be sure—to explore the roots of the concept of genius as it emerged in Immanuel Kant’s thought.


Aesthetic Experience Aesthetic Judgment Campus Community Reflective Judgment True World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1982. Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy, ed. R. Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boxer, Sarah 2000. A symbol of hatred pleads not guilty. New York Times, July 29.Google Scholar
  3. Bruno, Paul. 2011. Kant’s concept of genius. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  4. Flannery, Kelly. 2010. Theoretical byplay: Arendt’s use of Kant in political judgment. Dialogue 00122246 52 (2/3): 110–124.Google Scholar
  5. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1995. Truth and method. 2nd ed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Hughes, Glenn. 2011. Ulterior significance in the art of Bob Dylan. Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis 6: 18–40.Google Scholar
  7. Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of judgment. Trans. W. S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  8. Krantz, Laura. 2016. A dean faces a tall order: Making harvard more inclusive. Boston Globe, January 2.Google Scholar
  9. Lonergan, Bernard. 1971. Method in theology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1988. Collected works of Bernard Lonergan: Topics in education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1997. Twilight of the idols. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Plato. 2004. Republic. Trans. C.D.C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Ricoeur, Paul. 1998. Aesthetic experience. Philosophy & Social Criticism 24: 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sandel, Michael J. 1996. Democracy’s discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Taminiaux, Jacques. 1993. Poetics, speculation, and judgment. Trans. M. Gendre. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  16. Wyatt, Edward. 2004. The illegal swastika sells in Germany, but it’s still a hex. New York Times, October 7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Framingham State UniversityFraminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations