The Struggle for Recognition and the Return of Primary Intersubjectivity

Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 89)

Abstract

I argue that Axel Honneth (2012), reappropriated Colwyn Trevarthen's distinction between primary and secondary intersubjectivity,into his critical social theory. How the concept of primary intersubjectivity gets re-incorporated, or indeed, re-cognized in Honneth’s conception of recognition, however, is a complex issue that Iexplore in this essay. It is linked to questions not only about child development, but also about whether one should understand recognition in terms of a summons (Aufforderung), following Fichte, or in terms of a struggle, as Honneth, following Hegel, suggests, or in terms of a gift, as Ricoeur, following Hénaff suggests.

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 2013. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, Judith. 2008. Taking another’s view: Ambivalent implications. In Reification. A new look at an old idea, ed. Axel Honneth, 97–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castiello, U., C. Becchio, S. Zoia, C. Nelini, L. Sartori, L. Blason, V. Gallese, et al. 2010. Wired to be social: The ontogeny of human interaction. PloS One 5 (10): e13199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darwall, Stephen. 2005. Fichte and the second-person standpoint. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism 3: 91–113.Google Scholar
  5. Fichte, J.G. 2000. Foundations of Natural Right. Ed. F. Neuhouser. Trans. M. Baur. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Franks, Paul. 2005. All or nothing: Systematicity, transcendental arguments, and skepticism in German idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gallagher, Shaun. 2017. Social interaction, autonomy and recognition. In Body/Self/Other: The phenomenology of social encounters, ed. L. Dolezal and D. Petherbridge, 133–160. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Gallagher, Shaun, and Andrew Meltzoff. 1996. The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies. Philosophical Psychology 9 (2): 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophical anthropology and social criticism. In Reification. A new look at an old idea, ed. Axel Honneth, 120–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hegel, Georg W.F. 1997. Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hobson, Peter. 2004. The cradle of thought: Exploring the origins of thinking. London: Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Honneth, Axel. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Trans. J. Anderson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1998. Philosophy in Germany: Interview with S. Critchley. Radical Philosophy 89: 27–39.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2007. Disrespect: The normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2008a. Reification: A new look at an old idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2008b. Rejoinder. In Reification: A new look at an old idea, 147–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2012. The I in the we: Studies in the theory of recognition. Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  18. Larsen, S.N. 2014. Critical notice: Michael Tomasello on the ‘prosocial’ human animal. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology 5 (2): 257–269.Google Scholar
  19. Lear, Jonathan. 2008. The slippery middle. In Reification. A new look at an old idea, ed. Axel Honneth, 131–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marcelo, Gonçalo. 2011. Paul Ricoeur and the utopia of mutual recognition. Études Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies 2 (1): 110–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meehan, Johanna. 2011. Recognition and the dynamics of intersubjectivity. In Axel Honneth: Critical essays, ed. D. Petherbridge, 89–124. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nance, Michael. 2012. Recognition, freedom, and the self in Fichte’s foundations of natural right. European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3): 608–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reddy, Vasudevi. 2008. How infants know minds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. _____. 2015. Joining intentions in infancy. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22 (1–2): 24–44.Google Scholar
  25. Ricoeur, Paul. 2005. The course of recognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rochat, Philippe, and S.J. Hespos. 1997. Differential rooting response by neonates: Evidence for an early sense of self. Early Development and Parenting 6 (34): 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1976. Critique of Dialectical Reason: Theory of Practical Ensembles. Trans. Allan Sheridan-Smith. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  28. Siep, Ludwig. 1981. Methodische und systematische Schwierigkeiten in Fichtes ‘Grundlage des Naturrechts’. In Der transzendentale Gedanke, ed. K. Hammacher, 290–306. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  29. Taminiaux, Jacques. 1985. Hegel and Hobbes. In Dialectic and difference: Finitude in modern thought, ed. Jacques Taminiaux, 1–37. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ———. 1997. The Thracian maid and the professional thinker: Arendt and Heidegger. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  31. Trevarthen, Colwyn. 1979. Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication, ed. M. Bullowa, 321–348. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2008. Shared minds and the science of fiction: Why theories will differ. In The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity, ed. J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha, and E. Itkonen, vii–xii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trevarthen, Colwyn, and Paul Hubley. 1978. Secondary intersubjectivity: Confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year. In Action, gesture, and symbol: The emergence of language, ed. A. Lock, 183–227. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Varga, Somogy, and Shaun Gallagher. 2012. Critical social philosophy, Honneth, and the role of primary intersubjectivity. European Journal of Social Theory 15 (2): 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams, Robert. 1992. Recognition: Fichte and Hegel on the other. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2008. Ricoeur on recognition. European Journal of Philosophy 16 (3): 467–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Winnicott, Donald. 1998. Playing and reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Memphis (USA)MemphisUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Law, Arts and the HumanitiesUniversity of Wollongong (AU)WollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations