Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Deterrence: A Political and Psychological Critique

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Avoiding War, Making Peace

  • 628 Accesses

Abstract

The strategy of deterrence rests on a number of reinforcing assumptions. They include the belief that challenges are opportunity driven, that would-be challengers conduct a rational assessment of the risks and possible gains of any challenge, that would-be deterrers can successfully fathom and manipulate the cost-calculus of adversaries, and that the best way to do this is through increasing costs by means of threats. Drawing on empirical evidence, I show how these assumptions are all questionable at best, and how the practice of immediate deterrence has the potential to provoke the very behavior it seeks to prevent. I draw on motivational psychology, rational analysis, and domestic politics to explain such outcomes.

Richard Ned Lebow, ‘Deterrence: A Political and Psychological Critique’, Perspectives on Deterrence, 1989, pp. 26-51. Copyright © 1989 Oxford University Press. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, E. 1966. The Missile Crisis, 28. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achen, C.H., and D. Snidal. 1988. Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies. World Politics, fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, G. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 52–56, 237–244. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, D., and S. Okamoto (eds.). 1973. Pearl Harbor as History: Japanese- American Relations, 1931–1941. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, B. 1959. The Anatomy of Deterrence. World Politics 11: 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burlatsky, F. 1987a. Proceedings of the Cambridge Conference on the Cuban Missile Crisis. Cambridge, Mass, 11–12 October 1987, mimeograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlatsky, F. 1987b. The Caribbean Crisis and Its Lessons. Literaturnaya Gazeta, 11 November 1987: 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butow, R. 1961. Tojo and the Coming of the War. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A.L., and R. Smoke. 1974. Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gromyko, A.A. 1971. The Caribbean Crisis, 2 Parts. Voprosy istorii Nos. 4 & 8, English translation in Ronald R. Pope, Soviet Views on the Cuban Crisis: Myth and Reality in Foreign Policy Analysis, 161–226. Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M.A. 1984. The lran-lraq War: Implications for Third Parties. JCSS Paper No. 23. Tel Aviv and Cambridge: Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies and Harvard University Center for International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilsman, R. 1967. To Move a Nation, 164: 200–220. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horelick, A., and M. Rush. 1966. Strategic Power and Soviet Foreign Policy, 141. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosoya, C. 1968. Miscalculation in Deterrence Policy: Japanese-U.S. Relations, 1938–1941. Journal of Peace Research 2: 79–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huth, P., and B. Russett. 1984. What makes deterrence work? Cases from 1900 to 1980. World Politics 36 (4): 496–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ienaga, S. 1978. The Pacific War, 1931–1945. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ike, N. 1967. Japan’s Decision for War, Records of 1941: Policy Conferences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I., and L. Mann. 1977. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. 1979. Deterrence theory revisited. World Politics, 31: 289–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R., R.N. Lebow., and J.G. Stein. 1985. Psychology and Deterrence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M.A. 1958. The Calculus of Deterrence. World Politics 11: 20–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, W.W. 1954. The Requirements of Deterrence. Princeton, NJ: Center of International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H.A. 1960. The Necessity of Choice, 40–41. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khrushchev, N.S. 1970, 1974. Khrushchev Remembers. 2 vols, trans. ed. Strobe Talbott, 488–505, 509–514. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.N. 1981. Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis, 26–29, 48–51, 101–228. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.N. 1984. Windows of Opportunity: Do States Jump Through Them? International Security 9: 147–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.N. 1985. Conclusions. Psychology and Deterrence, 204–211. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.N. 1987a. Conventional and Nuclear Deterrence: Are the Lessons Transferable. Journal of Social Issues 43 (4): 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.N. 1987b. Deterrence Failure Revisited. International Security, 12: 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.N. Forthcoming. The Turkish Missile Deployment and the Origins of the Cuban Missile Crisis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.N., and J.G. Stein. 1987a. Beyond Deterrence. Journal of Social Issues 43 (4): 5–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.N., and J.G. Stein. 1987b. Beyond Deterrence: Building Better Theory. Journal of Social Issues 43 (4): 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, R. 1987. Proceedings of the Cambridge Conference on the Cuban Missile Crisis. Cambridge, Mass, 11–12 October 1987, mimeograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikoyan, S., 1987. Proceedings of the Cambridge Conference on the Cuban Missile Crisis. Cambridge, Mass, 11–12 October 1987, mimeograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milburn, T.W. 1959. What Constitutes Effective Deterrence? Journal of Conflict Resolution 3: 138–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orme, J. 1987. Deterrence Failures: A Second Look. International Security: 16–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quester, G. 1966. Deterrence Before Hiroshima: The Airpower Background to Modern Strategy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B. 1967. Pearl Harbor: Deterrence Theory and Decision Theory. Journal of Peace Research 4 (2): 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. 1966. Arms and Influence, 374. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaknazarov, G. 1987. Proceedings of the Cambridge Conference on the Cuban Missile Crisis. Cambridge, Mass, 11–12 October 1987, mimeograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, G.H., and P. Diesing. 1977. Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making and System Structure in International Crisis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. 1985. Perceptions of the Security Dilemma in 1914. In Psychology and Deterrence, eds. R. Jervis, R.N. Lebow, and J.G. Stein, 153–179. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J.G. 1985a. Calculation, Miscalculation, and Conventional Deterrence I: The View from Cairo. In Psychology and Deterrence, ed. R. Jervis, R.N. Lebow, and J.G. Stein, 34–59. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J.G. 1985b. Calculation, Miscalculation, and Conventional Deterrence II: The View from Jerusalem. In Psychology and Deterrence, ed. R. Jervis, R.N. Lebow, and J.G. Stein, 60–88. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatu, M. 1968. Power in the Kremlin: From Khrushchev s Decline to Collective Leadership, trans. ed. H. Katel. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P.E. 1987. Testing Deterrence Theory: Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Journal of Social Issues 43 (4): 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, C. 1986. Iraq—Ambitions Checked. Survival 28(November–December): 495–508.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of War Studies, King’s College London, London, UK

    Richard Ned Lebow

Authors
  1. Richard Ned Lebow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Ned Lebow .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lebow, R.N. (2018). Deterrence: A Political and Psychological Critique. In: Avoiding War, Making Peace. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56093-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation