Complication Management: Foreign Body Retrieval

Chapter

Abstract

Last few decades have witnessed a huge increase in the number of catheter-based interventions being performed around the world, which has also resulted in an increase in the number and variety of complications. Intravascular foreign bodies are usually iatrogenic and result from various endovascular procedures. They have the potential to cause grave complications such as embolism, ischemia, sepsis, and even death. Percutaneous retrieval of foreign bodies is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive approach. It is widely considered the standard of care today. The availability of various retrieval devices has added to our armamentarium to tackle this unique complication.

Notes

Acknowledgement

I am very thankful to Dr. Akhil Gautam for his help during writing of this manuscript. I also wish to express my gratitude to Prof. C N Manjunath, my mentor, for everything I have learned from him. My wife Dr. Charul Dhakad deserves special thanks for all the support and for critical review of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Cope C. Intravascular breakage of Seldinger spring wire guides. JAMA. 1962;180:1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas J, Sinclair-Smith B, Bloomfield D, et al. Non-surgical retrieval of a broken segment of steelspring guide from the right atrium and inferior venacava. Circulation. 1964;30:106–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dotter CT, Rosch J, Bilbao MK. Transluminal extraction of catheter and guide fragments from the heart and great vessels: 29 collected cases. Am J Roentgenol Radium Therapy, Nucl Med. 1971;111:467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bako B. Foreign body retrieval. Presented at the Interventional Radiology Society of Australasia, Queenstown; 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fisher RG, Ferreyro R. Evaluation of current techniques for nonsurgical removal of intravascular iatrogenic foreign bodies. Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130:541–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernhardt LC, Wegner GP, Mendenhall JT. Intravenous catheter embolization to the pulmonary artery. Chest. 1970;57:329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Richardson JD, Grover FL, Trinkle JK. Intravenous catheter emboli. Experience with twenty cases and collective review. Am J Surg. 1974;128:722–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mallmann CV, Wolf KJ, Wacker FK. Retrieval of vascular foreign bodies using a self-made wire snare. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:1124–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holmes DR Jr, Garratt KN, Popma J. Stent complications. J Invasive Cardiol. 1998;10:385–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gupta AK, Basappa H, Sadananda KS, Manjunath CN. In vivo delamination of coronary guidewire polytetrafluoroethylene layer – a dreaded complication. Indian Heart J. 2016;68:182–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jahrome AKH, Stella PR, Leijdekkers VJ, Guyomi SH, Moll GL. Abdominal aortic embolisation of a Figulla atrial septum occlude device, at the level of the celiac axis after an atrial septal defect closure: hybrid attempt. Vascular. 2010;18:59–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eggebrecht H, Haude M, von Birgelen C, et al. Nonsurgical retrieval of embolized coronary stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;51:432–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laarman G, Muthusamy TS, Swart H, et al. Direct coronarystent implantation: safety, feasibility, and predictors of successof the strategy of direct coronary stent implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;52:443–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brilakis ES, Best PJ, Elesber AA, et al. Incidence, retrieval methods, and outcomes of stent loss during percutaneous coronary intervention: a large single-Center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;65:333–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Veldhuijzen FL, Bonnier HJ, Michels HR, Gamal MI, van Gelder BM. Retrieval of undeployed stents from the right coronary artery: report of two cases. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998;30:245–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Collins N, Horlick E, Dzavik V. Triple wire technique for removal of fractured angioplasty guidewire. J Invasive Cardiol. 2007;19:E230–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brilakis ES, Abdel-Karim AR, Banerjee S. Hairpin-trap: a novel stent retrieval technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77:213–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Woodhouse JB, Uberoi R. Techniques for intravascular foreign body retrieval. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36:888–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seong CK, Kim YJ, Chung JW, et al. Tubular foreign bodyor stent: safe retrieval or repositioning using the coaxial snaretechnique. Korean J Radiol. 2002;3:30–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guimaraes M, Denton CE, Uflacker R, et al. Percutaneousretrieval of an Amplatzer septal occluder device that hadmigrated to the aortic arch. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35:430–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Foster-Smith KW, Garratt KN, Higano ST, Holmes DR Jr. Retrieval techniques for managing flexible intracoronary stentmisplacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;30:63–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dondelinger RF, Lepontre B, Kurdziel JC. Percutaneous vacular foreign body retrieval: experience of an 11-year peiod. Eur J Radiol. 1991;12:4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sheth R, Someshwar V, Warawdekar G. Percutaneousretrieval of misplaced intravascular foreign objects with theDormia basket: an effective solution. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30:48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lotze U, Ferrari M, Dannberg G, Kuhnert H, Figulla HR. Unexpanded, irretrievable stent in the proximal right coronary artery: successful management with stent graft implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46:344–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CardiologySri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences & ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations