Contemporary Organized Crime pp 47-64

Part of the Studies of Organized Crime book series (SOOC, volume 16)

Legal Prostitution Systems in Europe

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines selected European prostitution and trafficking policies and law enforcement practices. I first present two analytical approaches relevant to European policy regimes, and conclude that they are severely flawed either because of problematic assumptions or because the data are insufficient to support the conclusions drawn by the analysts. I then examine (1) issues regarding sex trafficking, (2) public opinion in various European states, and (3) recent political struggles over prostitution policy in the Netherlands and Germany, which illustrates the kinds of debates that may arise after prostitution has been decriminalized.

Keywords

Sex work Sex trafficking Research methods Public policy 

References

  1. Aalbers, M., & Deinema, M. (2012). Placing prostitution: The spatial-sexual order of Amsterdam and its growth coalition. City, 16, 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agustín, L. (2008). Sex and the limits of enlightenment: The irrationality of legal regimes to control prostitution. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 5, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amsterdam Sociaal. (2010). De Amsterdamse prostitutie monitor. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Sociaal.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, E. (2007). Temporarily yours: Intimacy, authenticity, and the commerce of sex. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho, S. Y. (2016). Liberal coercion? Prostitution, human trafficking, and policy. European Journal of Law and Economics, 41, 321–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cho, S. Y., Dreher, A., & Neumayer, E. (2013). Does legalized prostitution increase human trafficking? World Development, 41, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CoMensha. (2010). Annual report. Amersfoort: CoMensha Coordination Center Against Human Trafficking.Google Scholar
  8. Daalder, A. (2007). Prostitution in the Netherlands since the lifting of the brothel ban. The Hague: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  9. Danter, E. (1999, February 6). Green light at last for Dutch red light districts. Deutsche Presse-Agentur.Google Scholar
  10. Di Tommaso, M., Shima, I., Strøm, S., & Bettio, F. (2009). As bad as it gets: Well-being deprivation of sexually exploited trafficked women. European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dölemeyer, A., Pates, R., & Schmidt, D. (2010). Deviant girls, small-scale entrepreneurs, and the regulation of German sex workers. In M. Ditmore, A. Levy, A. Willman (Eds.), Sex work matters (pp. 184–202). New York: Zed.Google Scholar
  12. Emergo Group Project. (2011). Emergo: The joint approach to organized crime in the heart of Amsterdam. Gemeente Amsterdam/Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  13. Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women, and Youth. (2007). Report by the Federal Government on the impact of the Act regulating the legal situation of prostitutes (Prostitution Act). Berlin: Federal Ministry.Google Scholar
  14. Feingold, D. (2005). Human trafficking. Foreign Policy (September), pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
  15. Hubbard, P., & Whowell, M. (2008). Revisiting the red light district: Still neglected, immoral, and marginal? Geoforum, 39, 1743–1755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ILO [International Labour Organization]. (2005). A global alliance against forced labor. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  17. Jakobsson, N., & Kotsadam, A. (2013). The law and economics of international sex slavery: Prostitution laws and trafficking for sexual exploitation. European Journal of Law and Economics, 35, 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kleemans, E. R., & Huisman, W. (2015). Multi-agency approaches in “criminogenic” settings: The case of the Amsterdam red-light district. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 64, 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mai, N. (2009). Migrant workers in the UK sex industry. London: London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
  20. Mathieu, L. (2004). The debate on prostitution in France: A conflict between abolitionism, regulation, and prohibition. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 12, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mathieu, L. (2012). An ambiguous compassion: Policing and debating prostitution in contemporary France. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MORI. (2008). Ipsos MORI prostitution survey. June 11–12, 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Municipal Council. (2008). Heart of Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Municipal Council.Google Scholar
  24. National Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings. (2005). Trafficking in human beings: Third report of the Dutch National Rapporteur. The Hague: Bureau Nationaal Rapporteur Mensenhandel.Google Scholar
  25. National Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings. (2010a). Human trafficking: Ten years of independent monitoring. The Hague: Bureau Nationaal Rapporteur Mensenhandel.Google Scholar
  26. National Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings. (2010b). Trafficking in human beings: Seventh report of the Dutch National Rapporteur. The Hague: Bureau Nationaal Rapporteur Mensenhandel.Google Scholar
  27. National Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings. (2013). Does legalized prostitution generate more human trafficking?. The Hague: Bureau Nationaal Rapporteur Mensenhandel.Google Scholar
  28. National Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings. (2014). Mensenhandel in en uit beeld II. The Hague: Bureau Nationaal Rapporteur Mensenhandel.Google Scholar
  29. Oude Breuil, B. C., Siegel, D., van Reenen, P., Beijer, A., & Roos, L. (2011). Human trafficking revisited: Legal, enforcement, and ethnographic narratives on sex trafficking to Western Europe. Trends in Organized Crime, 14, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Outshoorn, J. (2012). Policy change in prostitution in the Netherlands: From legalization to strict control. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pates, R. (2012). Liberal laws juxtaposed with rigid control: An analysis of the logics of governing sex work in Germany. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9, 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reckless, W. (1933). Vice in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Scoular, J. (2010). What’s law got to do with it? How and why law matters in the regulation of sex work. Journal of Law and Society, 37, 12–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegel, D. (2012). Mobility of sex workers in European cities. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 18, 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siegel, D. (2015). Het Zandpad—Closing brothels or closing eyes? Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  36. Surtees, R. (2008). Traffickers and trafficking in Southern and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. UNODC [United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime]. (2006). Global report on trafficking in persons. Vienna: United Nations.Google Scholar
  38. USDS [U.S. Department of State]. (2010). Trafficking in persons report 2010. Washington, DC: USDS.Google Scholar
  39. USDS. (2015). Trafficking in persons report 2015. Washington, DC: USDS.Google Scholar
  40. Verhoeven, M., van Gestel, B., de Jong, D., & Kleemans, E. (2015). Relationships between suspects and victims of sex trafficking. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 21, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weitzer, R. (2012). Legalizing prostitution: From illicit vice to lawful business. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Weitzer, R. (2014). The social ecology of red-light districts: A comparison of Antwerp and Brussels. Urban Affairs Review, 50, 702–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weitzer, R. (2015). Human trafficking and contemporary slavery. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weitzer, R., & Boels, D. (2015). Ghent’s red-light district in comparative perspective. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12, 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations