Skip to main content

The Ethics in the Management of Patients with Disorders of Consciousness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Coma and Disorders of Consciousness

Abstract

The ethical issues accrued from the study and management of patients with disorders of consciousness are variant and multifaceted. The medical, public and legal controversies are partly shaped by how different people think about pain perception and end of life. Uniform ethical frameworks need to be shaped in order to guide clinicians and caregivers in terms of clinical outcome, prognosis and medical management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Laureys S, Boly M. What is it like to be vegetative or minimally conscious? Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20(6):609–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School. A definition of irreversible coma. JAMA. 1968;205(6):337–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeman A. Consciousness. Brain. 2001;124:1263–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Demertzi A, Liew C, Ledoux D, Bruno MA, Sharpe M, Laureys S, et al. Dualism persists in the science of mind. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1157:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Posner JB, Saper CB, Schiff ND, Plum F. Plum and Posner’s diagnosis of stupor and coma. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jennett B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: a syndrome in search of a name. Lancet. 1972;299(7753):734–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, Lavrijsen J, León-Carrión J, Sannita WG, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58(3):349–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, Ventura M, Boly M, Majerus S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Demertzi A, Antonopoulos G, Heine L, Voss HU, Crone JS, de Los Angeles C, et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity differentiates minimally conscious from unresponsive patients. Brain. 2015;138:2619–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sitt JD, King J, El Karoui I, Rohaut B, Faugeras F, Gramfort A, et al. Large scale screening of neural signatures of consciousness in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Brain. 2014;137:2258–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Stender J, Gosseries O, Bruno M, Charland-verville V, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Demertzi A, et al. Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study. Lancet Neurol. 2014;6736(14):8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Casali AG, Gosseries O, Rosanova M, Boly M, Sarasso S, Casali KR, et al. A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(198):198ra105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Horne M. Are people in a persistent vegetative state conscious? Monash Bioeth Rev. 2009;28(2):12-1-12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahane G, Savulescu J. Brain damage and the moral significance of consciousness. J Med Philos. 2009;34:6–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. The Multi-society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state-2. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1572–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Demertzi A, Schnakers C, Ledoux D, Chatelle C, Bruno M-A, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Different beliefs about pain perception in the vegetative and minimally conscious states: a European survey of medical and paramedical professionals. Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:329–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schnakers C, Chatelle C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Majerus S, Ledoux D, Boly M, et al. The nociception coma scale: a new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness. Pain. 2010;148(2):215–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McQuillen MP. Can people who are unconscious or in the ‘vegetative state’ perceive pain? Issues Law Med. 1991;6(4):373–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Laureys S, Pellas F, Van Eeckhout P, Ghorbel S, Schnakers C, Perrin F, et al. The locked-in syndrome: what is it like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless? Prog Brain Res. 2005;150(5):495–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. The infant with anencephaly. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(10):669–74.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laureys S, Faymonville ME, Peigneux P, Damas P, Lambermont B, Del Fiore G, et al. Cortical processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in the persistent vegetative state. Neuroimage. 2002;17(2):732–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boly M, Faymonville M-E, Schnakers C, Peigneux P, Lambermont B, Phillips C, et al. Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: an observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(11):1013–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fins JJ. Affirming the right to care, preserving the right to die: disorders of consciousness and neuroethics after Schiavo. Palliat Support Care. 2006;4(2):169–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahronheim JC, Gasner MR. The sloganism of starvation. Lancet. 1990;335(8684):278–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Demertzi A, Racine E, Bruno A, Ledoux D, Gosseries O, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Pain perception in disorders of consciousness: neuroscience, clinical care, and ethics in dialogue. Neuroethics. 2013;6(1):37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A report of a working party of the Royal College of Physicians. The vegetative state: guidance on diagnosis and management. Clin Med. 2003;3(3):249–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bernat JL. Ethical issues in the perioperative management of neurologic patients. Neurol Clin. 2004;22:457–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Youngner SJ. Do-not-resuscitate orders: no longer secret, but still a problem. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987;17(1):24–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Laureys S. Science and society: death, unconsciousness and the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(11):899–909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Boveroux P, Kirsch M, Boly M, Massion P, Sadzot B, Lambermont B, et al. Evaluation du pronostic neurologique dans les encéphalopathies postanoxiques. Reanimation. 2008;17:613–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bernat JL, Beresford HR. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition. Neurology. 2006;66(11):1618–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosner F. Why nutrition and hydration should not be withheld from patients. Chest. 1993;104(6):1892–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Steinbrook R, Lo B. Artificial feeding—solid ground, not a slippery slope. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(5):286–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Demertzi A, Ledoux D, Bruno M-A, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Gosseries O, Soddu A, et al. Attitudes towards end-of-life issues in disorders of consciousness: a European survey. J Neurol. 2011;258(6):1058–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bernat JL. The concept and practice of brain death. Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:369–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Brierley JB, Graham DI, Adams JH, Simpsom JA. Neocortical death after cardiac arrest. A clinical, neurophysiological, and neuropathological report of two cases. Lancet. 1971;2(7724):560–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bernat JL. Brain death. In: Laureys S, Tononi G, editors. The neurology of consciousness. 1st ed. London: Academic Press; 2009. p. 151–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Engelhardt K. Organ donation and permanent vegetative state. Lancet. 1998;351(9097):211–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bernat JL. Clinical ethics and the law. In: Ethical issues in neurology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 79–107.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. The economics of dying. The illusion of cost savings at the end of life. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(8):540–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jennett B. Resource allocation for the severely brain-damaged. Arch Neurol. 1976;33:595–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Beresford HR. The Quinlan decision: problems and legislative alternatives. Ann Neurol. 1977;2:74–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Quill TE. Terri Schiavo—a tragedy compounded. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(16):1630–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wijdicks EFM. Law and bioethics. In: The comatose patient. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 201–16.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jennett B. Ethical issues. In: The vegetative state: medical facts, ethical and legal dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Racine E, Amaram R, Seidler M, Karczewska M, Illes J. Media coverage of the persistent vegetative state and end-of-life-decision-making. Neurology. 2008;71(13):1027–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Nizzi M-C, Demertzi A, Gosseries O, Bruno M-A, Jouen F, Laureys S. From armchair to wheelchair: how patients with a locked-in syndrome integrate bodily changes in experienced identity. Conscious Cogn. 2012;21(1):431–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bruno M-A, Bernheim JL, Ledoux D, Pellas F, Demertzi A, Laureys S. A survey on self-assessed well-being in a cohort of chronic locked-in syndrome patients: happy majority, miserable minority. BMJ Open. 2011;1(1):e000039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Demertzi A, Jox RJ, Racine E, Laureys S. A European survey on attitudes towards pain and end-of-life issues in locked-in syndrome. Brain Inj. 2014;28(9):1209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Demertzi A, Laureys S. Detecting levels of consciousness. In: Clausen J, Levy N, editors. Handbook of neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015. p. 665–77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Demertzi Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Demertzi, A. (2018). The Ethics in the Management of Patients with Disorders of Consciousness. In: Schnakers, C., Laureys, S. (eds) Coma and Disorders of Consciousness. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55964-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55964-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55963-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55964-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics