Skip to main content
  • 298 Accesses

Abstract

In the first section of this very dense chapter Hegel attempts to show that determine being first proves to be quality, which then splits into reality and negation. The dialectic of these determinatenesses leads to the category of something, which is limited and negated by its other. The conception of the limit of the something leads to the conception of finite being, which proves to be unstable. The result of this instability is the self-contradictory spurious infinite. This contradiction is resolved in the true infinite, which is the sublated unity of the finite and the infinite. Such an infinite unity is called “being-for-itself.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Burbidge, John. 1981. On Hegel’s Logic: Fragments of a Commentary, 48. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, David G. 2007. A Commentary to Hegel’s Science of Logic, 72. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, Simon. 2006. The Logic of Expression: Quality, Quantity and Intensity in Spinoza, Hegel and Deleuze, 16. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1976. Hegel’s Dialectic: Five Hermeneutical Studies, 57, trans. ed. P. Christopher Smith. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Errol E. 1983. An Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel, 122. University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W.F. 1833. Wissenschaft der Logik. Erster Theil: Die Objektive Logik. Erste Abtheilung: Die Lehre Vom Seyn, ed. Leopold Von Henning. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W.F. 1894. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, 21, vol. 1, trans. ed. Elizabeth S. Haldane. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1894. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, 28, vol. 2, trans. ed. Elizabeth S. Haldane. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W.F. 1969. Wissenschaft der Logik I. Erster Teil: Die Objektive Logik. Erstes Buch, edited by Eva Moldenhauer und Karl M. Michel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, Hegel’s Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1970. Philosophy of Nature, Being Part Two of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, trans. ed. Ardold V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1991. The Encyclopaedia Logic: Part I of the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences with the Zusätze, trans. ed. T. F Geraets et al. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlgate, Stephen. 2006. The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity, 206. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inwood, Michael. 1983. Hegel, 162. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1981. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, 414, 388, trans. ed. James W. Ellington. Indianapolis, IN. Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, A288/B344, trans, ed. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1960. Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory, 132. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2012. “‘Omnis determinatio est nagatio’: Determination, Negation, and Self-Negation in Spinoza, Kant, and Hegel.” In Spinoza and German Idealism, ed. Eckart Foster and Yitzhak Y. Melamed, 175–96. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mure, Geoffrey R. G. 1950. A Study of Hegel’s Logic, 51. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato 1996. Parmenides, 127e, trans. ed. Mary L. Gill and Paul Ryan. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, Giacomo. 1992. A History and Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel, 148. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Stanley. 2015. The Idea of Hegel’s Science of Logic. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparby, Terje. 2014. Hegel’s Conception of the Determinate Negation. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, Benedict de. 2006. Improvement of the Understanding, Ethics and Correspondence, 375, trans. ed. Robert H. M. Elwes. New York: Cosimo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1977. Hegel, 234–235. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Robert. 2005. Hegel’s Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God, 71–72. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, Richard D. 2012. Hegel’s Science of Logic: A Critical Rethinking in Thirty Lectures. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Tabak .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tabak, M. (2017). Determinate Being. In: The Doctrine of Being in Hegel’s Science of Logic. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55938-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics