Advertisement

The Global Goals: Formalism Foregone, Contested Legality and “Re-imaginings” of International Law

Chapter
Part of the Ethiopian Yearbook of International Law book series (EtYIL, volume 2016)

Abstract

The Global Goals adopted in 2015 are the next phase in the UN’s plans to tackle poverty and the systemic causes of under-development and other global problems. As with the previous Millennium Development Goals, the Global Goals are expressly political in nature. This paper considers the function, status and role of international law in global development and, in particular, how the Global Goals might be perceived in legal terms. The paper rejects the argument that they represent customary international law due to weaknesses in State practice and opinio juris, and is unpersuaded that it is helpful to categorise them as soft law as their purpose is aspirational and not regulatory. Thus, the Goals exist in an arena of contested legality. Two “re-imaginings” of international law are proposed; first, by connecting them to the non-binding Maastricht Principles on the Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and secondly, by linking them to ideas of international solidarity. The paper concludes that neither provides easy solutions. Nevertheless, what both do—in their own way—is to force us to question why international law is not viewed as an acceptable conduit for the advancement of global development?

Keywords

World Trade Organization Millennium Development Goal Sustainable Development Goal Global Goal International Lawyer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank the editors of the Yearbook, the anonymous reviewers and Dr. Graham Melling for the insightful observations on a draft of this paper.

References

  1. Allott P (1999) The concept of international law. Eur J Int Law 10:31–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alston P (2005) Ships passing in the night: the current state of the human rights and development debate seen through the lens of the millennium development goals. Hum Rights Q 27:755–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alston P (2015) Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights (4 August 2015) UN Doc. A/70/274Google Scholar
  4. Amin S (2006) The millennium development goals: a critique from the south. Mon Rev 57. http://monthlyreview.org/2006/03/01/the-millennium-development-goals-a-critique-from-the-south/
  5. Boas M, McNeill D (eds) (2003) Global institutions and development: framing the world? Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyle A, Chinkin C (2007) The making of international law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. CESCR (1990) General Comment 3 (‘The Nature of States Parties Obligations (Art. 2 par. 1)’) (14 December 1990) UN Doc. E/1991/23Google Scholar
  8. Committee on the Rights of the Child (2016) Concluding observations on the fifth period report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (3 June 2016) UN CRC/C/GBR/CO/5Google Scholar
  9. Dandan V (2014) Report of the Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity (1 April 2014) UN Doc. A/HRC/26/34Google Scholar
  10. Darrow M (2003) Between light and shadow: the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and international human rights law. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. De Schutter O, Eide A, Khalfan A, Orellana M, Salomon M, Seiderman I (2012) Commentary to the Maastricht principles on extraterritorial obligations of states in the area of economic, social and cultural rights. Hum Rights Q 34:1084–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Serpa Soares M (2015) Room for growth: the contribution of international law to development. Chin J Int Law 14:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. French D (2008) ‘From Seoul with love’: the continuing relevance of the 1986 Seoul ILA declaration on progressive development of public international law relating to a new international economic order. Neth Int Law Rev 55:3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. French D (2009) Global justice and the (ir)relevance of indeterminacy. Chin J Int Law 8:593–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. French D (2012) International development law in the spirit of solidarity: a personal view on the “International Law of the Ordinary”. In: Morin M, Cordonier Segger M-C, Gélinas F, Gehring M (eds) Responsibility, fraternity and sustainability in international law. LexisNexis, Ontario, pp 687–701Google Scholar
  16. French D (2015) Editorial: the 2015 global goals: the (present) world is not enough. Environ Liabil 23:77–79Google Scholar
  17. Hickel J (2015) The problem with saving the world. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/08/global-poverty-climate-change-sdgs/
  18. ILA (1986) Declaration on the progressive development of principles of public international law relating to a new international economic order. International Law Association (ILA), LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. IMF (2014) Strengthening the contractual framework to address collective action problems in sovereign debt restructuring. http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2014/090214.pdf
  20. Meagher R (1979) International redistribution of wealth and power: a study of the charter of economic rights and duties of states. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Milanovic M (2012) Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg. Eur J Int Law 23:121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruggie J (2006) Interim report of the special representative of the secretary-general on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises (UN Doc. E/CN.4/2006/97)Google Scholar
  23. Rühmkorf A (2015) Corporate social responsibility, private law and global supply chains. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salomon M (2007) Global responsibility for human rights: world poverty and the development of international law. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salomon M (2008) Poverty, privilege and international law: the millennium development goals and the guise of humanitarianism. Ger Yearb Int Law 51:39–74Google Scholar
  26. Scobbie I (2005) Slouching towards the Holy City: some weeds for Philip Allott. Eur J Int Law 16:299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. UN (2011) Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework (UN Human Rights Office of Human Rights Commissioner) UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31 (endorsed by the Human Rights Council in HRC resolution 17/4 (16 June 2011))Google Scholar
  28. UN (2015) Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the third international conference on financing for development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=2051&menu=35
  29. UNDP (1994) Human development report: new dimensions of human security. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-1994
  30. UNGA (1986) Declaration on the Right to Development (4 December 1986). UN Doc. A/RES/41/128Google Scholar
  31. UNGA (2000) United Nations Millennium Declaration (8 September 2000). UN Doc. A/RES/55/2 UNGAGoogle Scholar
  32. UNGA (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development (21 October 2015) UN Doc. A/RES/70/1Google Scholar
  33. Various (2011) Five decades of development debate on sustainability. Development 54:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wendt N (1999) 50th anniversary of the World Bank and the IMF prompts criticisms. Transl Law Contemp Probl 9:149–162Google Scholar
  35. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LincolnLincolnUK

Personalised recommendations