Boredom and Space

Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)


Boredom appears as cause and effect of the cycle of innovation, as the disaffection with ‘the old’ that drives the search for ‘the new’. It is a state of ambiguity and ambivalence, idleness and restlessness, with a critical and relational essence. Although boredom has usually been described as a negative reaction to the environment, it also generates mental space, in real time, to promote mechanisms of introspection and transgression. The condition instigates experimentation with the ultimate aim to procure transcendence. These characteristics coincide with the paradoxes and contradictions of the modern experience. The overpowering processes of capitalism—industrialisation, secularisation, rationalisation, urbanisation and the consolidation of the nation-state—have resulted in an everyday life characterised by repetition, monotony and habit. Within this context, boredom is not only an index of an alternative sensibility to the values and visions of modernism but also a way of conceptualising history. To facilitate its analysis, three levels, or spaces, of complexity have been identified: the first refers to its structural properties as an individual disorder, the second contextualises boredom as a reality of the modern era, and the third lengthens its temporality as a historical threshold responsible for the possibilities of the future. This understanding is based on a juxtaposition of philosophical and critical elaborations on the modern by thinkers of the twentieth century, including Walter Benjamin, Martin Heidegger, and Henri Lefebvre, and examinations on boredom done in retrospective by contemporary scholars, including Andrew Benjamin, Lars Svendsen, and Peter Toohey.


Boredom Space Modernity 


  1. Barnhart, R. K. (1999). Chambers dictionary of etymology. Edinburgh: Chambers.Google Scholar
  2. Benjamin, A. (2005). Boredom and distraction: The moods of modernity. In A. Benjamin (Ed.), Walter Benjamin and history. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, W. (2002). Convolute D: Boredom, eternal return. In The arcades project. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cioran, E. (1987). History and utopia. New York: Seaver.Google Scholar
  5. Crang, M., & Thrift, N. (2000). Thinking space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Fenichel, O. (1951). On the psychology of boredom. In D. Rapaport (Ed.), Organization and pathology of thought. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Healy, S. (1984). Boredom, self and culture. Rutherford: Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heidegger, M. (1995). The fundamental concepts of metaphysics. World, finitude, solitude. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Highmore, B. (2001). Everyday life and cultural theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Kierkegaard, S. (2004). Either/or. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  13. Kracauer, S. (1995). Boredom. In The mass ornament: Weimar essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kreisel, D. K. (2006). Wolf children and automata: Bestiality and boredom at home and abroad. In Representations (Vol. 96, No. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lefebvre, H. (1995). Introduction to modernity. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  16. Leopardi, G. (1991). Zibaldone di pensieri. Milan: Garzanti.Google Scholar
  17. Marx, K. (1976). Capital (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Nietzsche, F. (1968). The will to power. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  19. Petro, P. (2002). Aftershocks of the new. Feminism and film history. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pile, S. (1996). The body and the city. Psychoanalysis, space and subjectivity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Schachtel, E. (1959). Metamorphosis. On the development of affect, perception, attention, and memory. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Schopenhauer, A. (2007). The vanity of existence. In Studies in pessimism, New York: Cosimo.Google Scholar
  23. Simmel, G. (1971). The metropolis and mental life. Accessed on 1 November 2011 at:
  24. Spacks, P. M. (1995). Boredom. The literary history of a state of mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Stevenson, A. (2010). Oxford dictionary of english. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  26. Svendsen, L. (2005). A philosophy of boredom. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  27. Tardieu, É. (1913). L’Ennui: Etude psychologique. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  28. Teyssot, G. (1996). Boredom and bedroom: The suppression of the habitual. In Assemblage (Vol. 30). Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  29. Thiele, L.P. (1997). Postmodernity and the routinization of novelty: Heidegger on boredom and technology. In Polity (Vol. 29, No. 4). New York: Palgrave Macmillan Journals.Google Scholar
  30. Toohey, P. (2011). Boredom. A lively history. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oslo School of Architecture and DesignInstitute of Form, Theory and HistoryOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations