Skip to main content

Pursuing Resilience in Architectural Design Through International Experimental Projects: Exploring New Boundaries in the Design Studio Pedagogy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Transdisciplinary Urbanism and Culture

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 553 Accesses

Abstract

In response to the current global crisis, there is a growing demand for responsible behaviour in designing and building that can accommodate user needs through the design process. This chapter describes an innovative approach to the design process aiming to generate a model adopted by an international collaboration who are reconsidering the traditional design process and addressing a new paradigm of the thinking process. The project is experimental in nature and discusses the educational frameworks in architecture . It optimises a model, which demonstrates breakthroughs and trend-setting educational approaches and is potentially transferable to a range of other professions. The chapter argues that the educational ethos of ‘ethic of resilience ’ should be pursued by pushing the boundaries of the conventional Design Studio towards the formation of adaptive system settings. All the participants at the various stages of the innovative educational framework, named Build Our Nation (BON) and its first application Taifa Letu Tujenge (TLT), have already demonstrated, on one hand to be able to learn from the experience achieved from various stages undertaken in the past, and, on the contrary, to be flexible enough to proceed with changes reflecting on the external conditions. The vision is that the Higher Educational Institutions and, especially, universities must become more co-productive actors in society. It can be useful to think of a university as a manufacturer; and subsequently, a manufacturing company as an advanced workshop; a workshop as a real-world project; therefore, a real-world project connoted back to the meaning of university. This vicious cycle of pedagogy embedded in learning and teaching should be central to any higher education focusing on design and research aiming to inform each other through the values of social capital .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andreotti, L., & Costa, X. (1996). Theory of the dérive and other situationist writings on the City. Barcelona: Actar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassanese, S., Espanyol, A., & Rodeghiero, B. (2012). Build our nation international project: An Innovative educational model for systems thinking in design. In INTED2012 Proceedings (pp. 4849–4858).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times. Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bombaci, G., & Costanzo, M. (2011). The neutral field: 2A + P/A interviews Andrea Branzi. San Rocco Islands, 3, 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branzi, A. (1975). Radical notes. Casabella, 399(3), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnley, F., & Lemon, M. (2011). Exploring the process of whole system design. Design Studies, 32(2), 156–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology Supplement, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corboz, A. (1985). Il Territorio come Palinsesto. Casabella, 516(9), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Anjou, P. (2011). An alternative model for ethical decision-making in design: A Sartrean approach. Design Studies, 32, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Carlo, G. (2005). Le ragioni dell’architettura. Milano: operaDARC Electa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, K. (2011). The Core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Y. (1977). Ou commence la ville. Paris: UNESCO Etablissements humains et environnement socio-culturel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Y. (2000). Utopies realisable. Nouvelle edition. Paris: L’Eclat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Y. (2003). L’architecture de Survie: Une Philosophie de la Pauvrete, Paris: L’Eclat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, T. (2009). Design futuring: Sustainability, ethics and new practice. Berg: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galimberti, U. (2009). L’ospite inquietante. Il nichilismo e i giovani. Milano: Serie Bianca Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghrajedaghi, J. (2011). Systems thinking. Managing chaos and complexity. A Platform for designing business architecture. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 19(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacovoni, A. (2003). Game zone: Playgrounds between virtual scenarios and reality. Basel: Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (2004). Social identity. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, C. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. United States: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. (2003). Re: CP. Basel: Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1990). The meaning of the built environment. A nonverbal communication approach. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (2009). Cultura, Arquitectura y Diseno. Barcelona: Edicions UPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkinwise, C. (2011). A taste for practices: Unrepressing style in design thinking. Design Studies, 32(6), 533–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, B., Sullivan, P. J., & Palermo, G. (2000). Ethics and the practice of architecture. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Bassanese .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bassanese, S., Rodeghiero, B., Espanyol, A. (2018). Pursuing Resilience in Architectural Design Through International Experimental Projects: Exploring New Boundaries in the Design Studio Pedagogy. In: Zaman, Q., Troiani, I. (eds) Transdisciplinary Urbanism and Culture. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55855-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics