Skip to main content

Improving the Reproducibility of Genetic Association Results Using Genotype Resampling Methods

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNTCS,volume 10199)


Replication may be an inadequate gold standard for substantiating the significance of results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Successful replication provides evidence supporting true results and against spurious findings, but various population attributes contribute to observed significance of a genetic effect. We hypothesize that failure to replicate an interaction observed to be significant in a GWAS of one population in a second population is sometimes attributable to differences in minor allele frequencies, and resampling the replication dataset by genotype to match the minor allele frequencies of the discovery data can improve estimates of the interaction significance. We show via simulation that resampling of the replication data produced results more concordant with the discovery findings. We recommend that failure to replicate GWAS results should not immediately be considered to refute previously-observed findings and conversely that replication does not guarantee significance, and suggest that datasets be compared more critically in biological context.


  • GWAS
  • SNPs
  • Epistasis
  • Complex diseases
  • Reproducibility

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.


  1. Peng, R.D.: Reproducible research in computational science. Science 334(6060), 1226–1227 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Boettiger, C.: An introduction to Docker for reproducible research. ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 49(1), 71–79 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Patil, P., Peng, R.D., Leek, J.: A statistical definition for reproducibility and replicability. bioRxiv, 066803, 1 January 2016

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1097–1105 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., Berg, A.C.: Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 115(3), 211–252 (2015)

    MathSciNet  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Marchini, J., Donnelly, P., Cardon, L.R.: Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases. Nat. Genet. 37(4), 413–417 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Moore, J.H.: The ubiquitous nature of epistasis in determining susceptibility to common human diseases. Hum. Heredi. 56(1–3), 73–82 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Urbanowicz, R.J., Kiralis, J., Sinnott-Armstrong, N.A., Heberling, T., Fisher, J.M., Moore, J.H.: GAMETES: a fast, direct algorithm for generating pure, strict, epistatic models with random architectures. BioData Min. 5(1), 1 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Greene, C.S., Penrod, N.M., Williams, S.M., Moore, J.H.: Failure to replicate a genetic association may provide important clues about genetic architecture. PLoS One 4(6), e5639 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, J.H., Asselbergs, F.W., Williams, S.M.: Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26(4), 445–455 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, J., Ferreira, T., Morris, A.P., Medland, S.E., Madden, P.A., Heath, A.C., Martin, N.G., Montgomery, G.W., Weedon, M.N., Loos, R.J., Frayling, T.M.: Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits. Nat. Genet. 44(4), 369–375 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Buzdugan, L., Kalisch, M., Navarro, A., Schunk, D., Fehr, E., Bühlmann, P.: Assessing statistical significance in multivariable genome wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 32, 1990–2000 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Panagiotou, O.A., Ioannidis, J.P.: What should the genome-wide significance threshold be? Empirical replication of borderline genetic associations. Int. J. Epidemiol. 41(1), 273–286 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Church, D.M., Schneider, V.A., Graves, T., Auger, K., Cunningham, F., Bouk, N., Chen, H.C., Agarwala, R., McLaren, W.M., Ritchie, G.R., Albracht, D.: Modernizing reference genome assemblies. PLoS Biol. 9(7), e1001091 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenberg, N.A., Huang, L., Jewett, E.M., Szpiech, Z.A., Jankovic, I., Boehnke, M.: Genome-wide association studies in diverse populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11(5), 356–366 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants LM009012, and AI116794.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth R. Piette .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Piette, E.R., Moore, J.H. (2017). Improving the Reproducibility of Genetic Association Results Using Genotype Resampling Methods. In: Squillero, G., Sim, K. (eds) Applications of Evolutionary Computation. EvoApplications 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10199. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55848-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55849-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)