Acoustic Properties of Reservoir Fluids-CO2 System

  • Shib Sankar GanguliEmail author
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


One of the crucial objectives of any successful EOR project is to evaluate the changes in reservoir seismic properties due to the injection of foreign fluid, e.g. CO2. Monitoring the changes of seismic properties with the changes in fluid properties will help to enhance the reservoir production performance.


Total Dissolve Solid Bulk Modulus Acoustic Property Reservoir Condition Reservoir Fluid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Batzle M, Wang Z (1992) Seismic properties of pore fluids. Geophysics 57(11):1396–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown LT (2002) Integration of rock physics and reservoir simulation for the interpretation of time-lapse seismic data at Weyburn Field, Saskatchewan. M.Sc. thesis, Reservoir Characterization Proj., Colorado School of MinesGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown RJS, Korringa J (1975) On the dependence of the elastic properties of a porous rock on the compressibility of a pore fluid. Geophysics 40:608–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edwards DP, Lacour-Gayet PJ, Suan J (1963) Log evaluation in wells drilled with inverted oil emulsion mud. SPE-10206-MS, San Anthonio 313–318Google Scholar
  5. Gassmann F (1951) Über die elastizität poröser medien: Vierteljahrss-chrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zurich, 96, 1–23. The English translation of this paper is available at
  6. Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin J (1998) The rock physics handbook: tools for seismic analysis in porous media. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation of India (ONGC) (2010) Annual report of Ankleshwar asset for the year 2009–2010 by Sub-surface team. Ankleshwar asset, ONGCGoogle Scholar
  8. Peng DY, Robinson DR (1976) A new two-constant equation of state. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 15(1):59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Privat R, Jean-Noël Jaubert (2014) Predicting the phase equilibria of carbon dioxide containing mixtures involved in CCS processes using the PPR78 Model. In: CO2 Sequestration and valorization, esteves, V.P.P (Ed.), InTechOpen, 443–462Google Scholar
  10. Schlumberger (1989) Log Interpretation principles 8–9Google Scholar
  11. Smith TM, Sondergeld CH, Rai CS (2003) Gassmann fluid substitutions: a tutorial. Geophysics 68:430–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Van der Waals JD (1873) Over de continuiteit van den gas en vloeistoftoestand. Dissertation, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang Z, Nur AM, Batzle ML (1990) Acoustic velocities in petroleum oils. J Petrol Technol 42:192–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wood AW (1955) A textbook of sound. The MacMillan Co., New York, p 360Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR)/CSIR-National Geophysical Research InstituteHyderabad, Telangana StateIndia

Personalised recommendations