Abstract
It can be paternalistic to force people to choose. Although many people insist on drawing a bright line between active choosing and paternalism, that line is often illusory. Calling for active choosing is a form of libertarian paternalism if people are permitted to opt out of choosing in favor of a default (and in that sense not to choose). By contrast, calling for active choosing is a form of nonlibertarian paternalism insofar as people are actually required to choose. These points have implications for a range of issues in law and policy, suggesting that those who favor active choosing, and insist on it, may well be overriding people’s preferences and thus running afoul of John Stuart Mill’s Harm Principle (for better or for worse).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bar-Gill, Oren, and Cass R. Sunstein. 2015. Regulation as Delegation. Journal of Legal Analysis 7: 1–36.
Bartling, Bjorn, and Urs Fischbacher. 2012. Shifting the Blame: On Delegation and Responsibility. The Review of Economic Studies 79: 67.
Bobadilla-Suarez, Sebastian et al. 2016. Are Choosers Losers? The Propensity to Under-Delegate in the Face of Potential Gains and Losses (unpublished manuscript). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2733142.
Botti, Simona, and Christopher Hsee. 2010. Dazed and Confused by Choice: How the Temporal Costs of Choice Freedom Lead to Undesirable Outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 112: 161.
Bown, N.J., et al. 2003. The Lure of Choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16: 297.
Bruns, Hendrik et al. 2016. Can Nudges Be Transparent and Yet Effective? WiSo-HH Working Paper Series, Paper No. 33. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2816227.
Carmon, Ziv et al. 2003. Option Attachment: When Deliberating Makes Choosing Feel Like Losing. Journal of Consumer Research 30: 15.
Coons, Christian, and Michael Weber (eds.). 2013. Paternalism: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coupe, Tom, and Abdul Noury. 2004. Choosing Not to Choose: On the Link Between Information and Abstention. Economics Letters 84: 261.
Dwengler, Nadja et al. 2013. Flipping A Coin: Theory and Evidence (unpublished manuscript).
Dworkin, Gerald. 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hirschmann, Albert. 1997. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Loewenstein, George et al. 2015. Warning: You Are About to be Nudged. Behavioral Science & Policy 1 (1): 35.
Marzilla Ericson, Keith M., and Andreas Fuster. 2013. The Endowment Effect. Nat’l Bureau of Econ. Research, Working Paper No. 19384. http://www.nber.org/papers/w19384.
Mill, John Stuart. 1859. On Liberty, ed. Kathy Casey (2002).
Owens, David et al. 2014. The Control Premium: A Preference for Payoff Autonomy. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 6: 138–161. doi:10.1257/mic.6.4.138.
Sharot, Tali et al. 2009. How Choice Reveals and Shapes Expected Hedonic Outcome. The Journal of Neuroscience 29: 3760. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4972-08.2009.
Steffel, Mary et al. 2016. Ethically Deployed Defaults: Transparency and Consumer Protection through Disclosure and Preference Articulation. Journal of Marketing Research 53: 865. https://www.ama.org/publications/JournalOfMarketingResearch/Documents/jmr.14.0421(steffel_williams_pogacar).pdf.
Sunstein, Cass R. 2015. Choosing Not to Choose: Understanding the Value of Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, S.C. 1999. Illusions of Control: How We Overestimate Our Personal Influence. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8: 187–190. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00044.
Ulmann-Margalit, Edna. 2000. On Not Wanting to Know. In Reasoning Practically , ed. Edna Ullmann-Margalit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sunstein, C.R. (2017). “What Route Would You Like Me To Take?” Paternalists Who Force Choices. In: Human Agency and Behavioral Economics. Palgrave Advances in Behavioral Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55807-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55807-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55806-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55807-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)