Advertisement

Evolution of Yeast Selection for Fuel Ethanol: Breaking Paradigms

  • Henrique V. Amorim
  • Henrique Berbert de Amorim Neto
  • Mario Lucio Lopes
  • Silene Cristina de Lima Paulillo
Chapter

Abstract

In the last 40 years, yeast selection for ethanol production has broken several paradigms such as the replacement of morphological and biochemical test for molecular tools, like electrophoretic karyotyping to monitor yeast populations, contamination by wild yeasts, and selection of dominating and persistent strains. Yeast monitoring allowed to select industrial yeast strains (PE2, CAT1, FT858L, Fermel, BG1, and SA1) that are more robust than baker’s yeast, IZ1904, and laboratory strains that were used frequently by Brazilian distilleries at that time but do not survive more than 4 weeks to successive recycles of alcoholic fermentation processes. Genomic analysis revealed that industrial yeast strains have special traits that allow industrial yeasts to adapt, survive, and dominate the fermentation in comparison with nonindustrial strains. Later, another paradigm was broken when mitochondrial DNA analysis was introduced as an additional technique to karyotyping for identification of strains derived from industrial yeasts. The combination of both methodologies allowed to select a new generation of yeast strains tailored for ethanol production. It was demonstrated that some strains are derived from selected industrial yeasts like PE2. These new strains are better adapted for each process where they arose, once that each distillery has its own fermentation conditions and very specific selection pressures are acting on the yeast population. Finally, the last paradigm broken has been the inclusion of foaming and weakly flocculating yeast strains in selection programs. In the past, these strains were excluded from selection programs because of their unwanted traits. However, it has been an additional source to select the best fitted strains and the number of tailored-yeast strains has expanded every year. These strains represent a huge opportunity to understand the mechanisms of yeast adaptation and a platform to genetic breeding for new industrial applications.

Keywords

Tailored-yeast strain Process-driven selection Alcoholic fermentation Wild yeast Fuel ethanol Karyotyping, Mitochondrial DNA Saccharomyces Foaming Flocculation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to all Fermentec teams: Transfer of Technology, Engineering and New Technologies, Laboratories, Courses and Training of Staff.

References

  1. Amorim HV, Lopes ML (2013) Ciência e tecnologia na seleção de leveduras para produção de etanol. In: Almeida JRM (ed) Microrganismos em Agroenergia: da Prospecção aos Bioprocessos, annals. Embrapa Agroenergia, Brasilia. Available from: http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/95339/1/DOC15-19-12-2013.pdf [in Portuguese]. Accessed 22 June 2016
  2. Amorim HV, Basso LC, Lopes ML (2009) Sugar cane juice and molasses, beet molasses and sweet sorghum: composition and usage. In: Ingledew WM, Kelsall DR, Austin GD, Kluhspies C (eds) The alcohol textbook: a reference for the beverage, fuel, and industrial alcohol industries, 5th edn. Nottingham University Press, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  3. Amorim HV, Lopes ML, Oliveira JVC, Buckeridge M, Goldman GH (2011) Scientific challenges of bioethanol production in Brazil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:1267–1275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Argueso JL, Carazzolle MF, Mieczkowski PA, Duarte FM, Netto OVC, Missawa SK, Galzerani F et al (2009) Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome Res 19:2258–2270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Babrzadeh F, Jalili R, Wang C, Shokralla S, Pierce S, Robinson-Mosher A, Nyren P et al (2012) Whole-genome sequencing of the efficient industrial fuel-ethanol fermentative Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CAT-1. Mol Gen Genomics 6:485–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basso LC, Amorim HV, Oliveira AJ, Lopes ML (2008) Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res 8:1155–1163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Benítez T, Martínez P, Codón AC (1996) Genetic constitution of industrial yeast. Microbiologia 12:371–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boinot F (1937) Process for carrying out industrial alcoholic fermentations. United States Patent Office PI 2,230,318 https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US2230318.pdf. Accessed on 20 June 2016
  9. Ceccato-Antonini SR, Sudbery PE (2004) Filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Braz J Microbiol 35:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Codón AC, Benítez T, Korhola M (1997) Chromosomal reorganization during meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Baker’s yeasts. Curr Genet 32:247–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Codón AC, Benítez T, Korhola M (1998) Chromosomal polymorphism and adaptation to specific industrial environments of Saccharomyces strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 49:154–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Figueiredo CM (2008) Análise molecular da floculação e da formação de espuma por leveduras utilizadas na produção industrial de álcool combustível no Brasil. Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/91054/252707.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 19 June 2016
  13. Gimeno CJ, Fink GR (1994) Induction of pseudohyphal growth by overexpression of PHD1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene related to transcriptional regulators of fungal development. Mol Cell Biol 14:2100–2112CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Godoy A, Amorim HV, Lopes ML, Oliveira AJ (2008) Continuous and batch fermentation processes: advantages and disadvantages of these processes in the Brazilian ethanol production. Int Sugar J 110:175–181Google Scholar
  15. Govender P, Domingo JL, Bester MC, Pretorius IS, Bauer FF (2008) Controlled expression of the dominant flocculation genes FLO1, FLO5, and FLO11 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6041–6052CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kobayashi O, Yoshimoto H, Sone H (1999) Analysis of the genes activated by the FLO8 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 36:256–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lachance MA (2006) Yeast biodiversity: how many and how much? In: Rosa CA, Gabor P (eds) Biodiversity and ecophysiology of yeasts. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  18. Lopes ML (2000) Estudo do polimorfismo cromossômico em Saccharomyces cerevisiae (linhagem PE-2) utilizada no processo industrial de produção de etanol. Thesis, Universidade Estadual Julio de Mesquita FilhoGoogle Scholar
  19. Lopes ML, Paulillo SCL, Cherubin RA, Godoy A, Amorim Neto HB, Amorim HV (2015) Tailored-yeast strains for ethanol production: process-driven selection. http://fermentec.com.br/downloads/eBook_-_Tailored_yeast_strains_selected_for_ethanol_production_-_Fermentec.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2016
  20. López V, Querol A, Ramo D, Fernandez-Espinar MT (2001) A simplified procedure to analyse mitochondrial DNA from industrial yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol 68:75–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lorenzi MS, Paulillo SCL, Nogueira JHC, Oliveira DFG, Lopes ML, Amorim HV (2013) Desempenho da levedura Fermel® no processo de fermentação com alto teor alcoólico em escala piloto. 27° Congresso Brasileiro de Microbiologia, Resumo 1235–1Google Scholar
  22. Shimoi H, Sakamoto K, Okuda M, Atthi R, Iwashita K, Ito K (2002) The AWA1 gene is required for the foam-forming phenotype and cell surface hydrophobicity of sake yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2018–2025CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Stambuk BU, Dunn B, Alves Junior SL, Duval EH, Sherlock G (2009) Industrial fuel ethanol yeasts contain adaptive copy number changes in genes involved in vitamin B1 and B6 biosynthesis. Genome Res 19:2271–2278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Vezinhet F, Blondin B, Hallet JN (1990) Chromosomal DNA patterns and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism as tools for identification of enological strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 32:568–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vezinhet F, Hallet JN, Valade M, Poulard A (1992) Ecological survey of wine yeast strains by molecular methods of identification. Am J Enol Vitic 43:83–86Google Scholar
  26. Vicente FAFC (2015) Seleção, avaliação e utilização de uma levedura personalizada para a produção de etanol. Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita FilhoGoogle Scholar
  27. Wheals AE, Basso LC, Alves DMG, Amorim HV (1999) Fuel ethanol after 25 years. Trends Biotechnol 17:482–487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zolan ME (1995) Chromosome-length polymorphism in fungi. Microbiol Rev 59:686–698PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrique V. Amorim
    • 1
  • Henrique Berbert de Amorim Neto
    • 1
  • Mario Lucio Lopes
    • 1
  • Silene Cristina de Lima Paulillo
    • 1
  1. 1.Fermentec Tecnologias em Açúcar e Álcool LtdaPiracicabaBrazil

Personalised recommendations