Advertisement

Smart Cars Cruising on the Road Paved with Good Intentions? – Workshop on Big Data Applications and Individual Rights Under the New European General Data Protection Regulation

  • Felix Bieker
  • Barbara Büttner
  • Murat KarabogaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 498)

Abstract

In this workshop we addressed the protection of individuals in the EU General Data Protection Regulation with regard to threats posed by big data applications. Using smart cars as an example, the workshop focused on the individuals’ rights under the new Regulation. After an introduction to these topics, participants were invited to discuss these issues in groups and draw general conclusions on the effectiveness of the rights for individuals under the General Data Protection Regulation.

Keywords

Smart cars Individual rights Big data General Data Protection Regulation EU law 

References

  1. 1.
    Hansen, M.: Das Netz im Auto & das Auto im Netz. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 39(6), 367–371 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Future of Privacy Forum: The connected car and privacy. Navigating new data issues. White paper (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen, A., Arce-Plevnik, L., Shor, T.: IoT in automotive industry: Connecting cars. Unpublished paper (2016). http://works.bepress.com/luis-arce-plevnik/2/
  4. 4.
    European Commission: Business Innovation Observatory. Internet of things. Connected cars. Case Study 43 (2015). http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/13394/attachments/2/translations/en/renditions/pdf
  5. 5.
    Hornung, G.: Verfügungsrecht an fahrzugbezogenen Daten. Das vernetzte Automobil zwischen innovativer Wertschöpfung und Persönlichkeitsschutz. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 39(6), 359–366 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lüdemann, V.: Connected Cars. Das vernetzte Auto nimmt Fahrt auf, der Datenschutz bleibt zurück. ZD 6(2015), 247–254 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kremer, S.: Connected Car – intelligente Kfz, intelligente Verkehrssysteme, intelligenter Datenschutz? Recht der Datenverarbeitung 5(2014), 240–252 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bennett, C.J., Bayley. R.M.: Privacy protection in the era of ‘big data’: regulatory challenges and social assessments. In: Van der Sloot, B., Broeders, D., Schrijvers, E. (eds.) Exploring the Boundaries of Big Data, pp. 205–227. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klous, S.: Sustainable harvesting of the big data potential. In: Van der Sloot, B., Broeders, D., Schrijvers, E. (eds.) Exploring the Boundaries of Big Data, pp. 27–47. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ward, J.S., Barker, A.: Undefined by Data: A Survey of Big Data Definitions (2013). arXiv Preprint: arXiv:1309.5821
  11. 11.
    Gartner, Inc.: IT Glossary: Big Data. http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/big-data/
  12. 12.
    Poel, M., Schroeder, R., Treperman, J., Rubinstein, M., et al.: Data for Policy: A Study of Big Data and Other Innovative Data-Driven Approaches for Evidence-Informed Policymaking (Report about the State-of-the-Art). Oxford Internet Institute, Center for European Policy Studies, Amsterdam: technopolis (2015). http://www.data4policy.eu/#!state-of-the-art-report/cjg9
  13. 13.
    Gandomi, A., Haider, M.: Beyond the hype: big data concepts, methods, and analytics. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 35(2), 137–144 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Executive Office of the President: Big Data: Seizing Opportunities, Preserving Values. The White House, Washington, DC, May 2014Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mayer-Schönberger, V., Cukier, K.: Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. John Murray, London (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    DIVSI, and iRights.Lab. “Big Data.” Hamburg, January 2016Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu, F.: Smart data for mobility (SD4M): eine big-data-analytik-plattform für multimodale smart mobility services. Presented at the Bitkom Big Data Summit 2015, Congress Park Hanau, 25 February 2015Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Watts, J.M., Purnell, N.: Singapore Is Taking the ‘Smart City’ to a Whole New Level. Wall Street J., 25 April 2016. http://www.wsj.com/articles/singapore-is-taking-the-smart-city-to-a-whole-new-level-1461550026
  19. 19.
    Albino, V., Berardi, U., Dangelico, R.M.: Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 22(1), 3–21 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    DeBord, M.: World Economic Forum: Who owns connected car data? (2015). https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/09/who-owns-connected-car-data/
  21. 21.
    Derikx, S., de Reuver, M., Kroesen, M.: Can privacy concerns for insurance of connected cars be compensated? Electron Markets 26(1), 73–81 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stöhring, M.: Mein Auto, meine Daten? Fahrzeuggeneriertes Datenmaterial: Nutzung und Rechtsansprüche. c’t Magazin für Computer und Technik 11(2016), 128–133 (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Federal Trade Commission: The Internet of Things: Privacy and Security in a Connected World. FTC Staff Report (2015). https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-staff-report-november-2013-workshop-entitled-internet-things-privacy/150127iotrpt.pdf
  24. 24.
    Van der Sloot, B.: The individuals in the big data era: moving towards an agent-based privacy paradigm. In: Van der Sloot, B., Broeders, D., Schrijvers, E. (eds.) Exploring the Boundaries of Big Data, pp. 177–203. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clavell, G.G.: Policing, big data and the commodification of security. In: Van der Sloot, B., Broeders, D., Schrijvers, E. (eds.) Exploring the Boundaries of Big Data, pp. 89–115. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Article 29 Data Protection Working Party: Opinion 03/2013 on purpose limitation. Brussels, 00569/13/EN, WP 2013, 2 April 2013Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., Kirchner, L.: ProPublica. Machine Bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica, 23 Mai 2016. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
  28. 28.
    Yu, P., McLaughlin, J., Levy, M.: Big Data: A Big Disappointment for Scoring Consumer Credit Risk. NCLC, National Consumer Law Center, Boston, MA, 14 März 2014Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    ECJ, Joined Cases C-465/00, C-138/01 and C-139/01 Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2003:294Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    ECJ, Joined Cases C-92/09 and 93/09 Schecke and Eifert, ECLI:EU:C:2010:662Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    ECJ, Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger, ECLI:EU:C:2014:238Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    ECJ, Case C-362/14 Schrems, ECLI:EU:C:2015:650Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Security and Privacy in your Car Act by the Senators Markey und Blumenthal from 21 July 2015. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1806/text
  34. 34.
    Boehme-Neßler, V.: Big Data und Demokratie – Warum Demokratie ohne Datenschutz nicht funktioniert. Das Deutsche Verwaltungsblatt, pp. 1282–1287 (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roßnagel, A.: Schriftliche Stellungnahme zum öffentlichen Fachgespräch zur Daten-schutz-Grundverordnung am 24. Februar 2016 im Ausschuss Digitale Agenda des Deutschen Bundestags (2016). https://www.bundestag.de/blob/409512/4afc3a566097171a7902374da77cc7ad/a-drs-18-24-94-data.pdf
  36. 36.
    Roßnagel, A., Geminn, C., Jandt, S., Richter, P.: Datenschutzrecht 2016 “Smart” genug für die Zukunft?: Ubiquitous Computing und Big Data als Herausforderungen des Datenschutzrechts. Bd. 4. Kassel University Press GmbH, Kassel (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix Bieker
    • 1
  • Barbara Büttner
    • 2
  • Murat Karaboga
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz (ULD, Independent Centre for Privacy Protection) Schleswig-HolsteinKielGermany
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of KasselKasselGermany
  3. 3.Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISIKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations