Skip to main content

Socio-economic Assessment of a Selected Multi-use Offshore Site in the Atlantic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ocean of Tomorrow

Abstract

This chapter presents the results obtained from the analysis of the multi-use design for the Cantabria Offshore site in the Atlantic coast. The analysis shows that the technology exists. Nevertheless at the present the profitability of potential business is still uncertain. The reliability of the activity as a self-sustained business relies on the existence of a stable regulatory framework, on the availability of financial support from the state and on the relaxation of the regulatory barriers existing in the industry. Likewise ocean energy industry is far from been socially accepted in the region. The socio-economic analysis suggests that the multi-use scenario can be profitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pugh and Skinner (2002) paper was used for the purpose of benefit transfer.

  2. 2.

    It should be noted that the device is still under a process of refining and improving the capacity factor (ratio of energy captured over nominal capacity of the device). The final figures are expected to improve in the near future.

References

  • Arrow, K. J., Cropper, M. L., Gollier, C., Groom, B., Heal, G. M., Newell, R. G., Nordhaus, W. D., Pindyck, R. S., Pizer, W., Portney, P. R., Sterner, T., Tol, R. S. J., & Weitzman, M. L. (2014). Should governments use a declining discount rate in project analysis?. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8(2), 145–163 doi:10.1093/reep/reu008. [Online] Available at: http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/weitzman/files/rev_environ_econ_policy-2014-arrow-145-63_0.pdf

  • Dasgupta, P. (2008). Discounting climate change. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37(2–3), 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M., Groom, B., Panipoulou, K., & Pantelides, T. (2013). Declining discount rates and the Fisher effect: Inflated past, discounted future. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom, B., Koundouri, P., Panopoulou, E., & Pantelidis, T. (2007). Discounting the distant future: How much does model selection affect the certainty equivalent rate? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 641–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itten, R., Frischknecht, R., & Stucki, M. (2014). Life cycle inventories of electricity mixes and grid version 1.3. http://www.esu-services.ch/fileadmin/download/publicLCI/itten-2012-electricity-mix.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2015.

  • MERMAID Project. (2015). Platform solutions. Innovative multi-purpose offshore platforms: Planning, design & operation (MERMAID), EU FP7 granted project, Deliverable: D2.4. [Online] Available at: http://www.mermaidproject.eu/sharepoint/func-startdown/407/. Accessed 7 Feb 2016.

  • MERMAID Project. (2016). Site specific design conditions. Innovative multi-purpose offshore platforms: planning, design & operation (MERMAID), EU FP7 granted project, Deliverable: D7.3. [Online] Available at: http://www.mermaidproject.eu/sharepoint/func-startdown/435/. Accessed 7 Feb 2016.

  • Newell, R., & Pizer, W. (2003). Discounting the distant future: How much do uncertain rates increase valuations? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(1), 52–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (2003). The social cost of carbon and its policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(3), 362–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, D., & Skinner, L. (2002). A new analysis of marine-related activities in the UK economy with supporting science and technology. Inter-Agency Committee on Marine Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlömer, S., Bruckner, T., Fulton, L., Hertwich, E., McKinnon, A., Perczyk, D., Roy, J., Schaeffer, R., Sims, R., Smith, P., Wiser, R. (2014). Annex III: Technology-specific cost and performance parameters. In: O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, J. C. Minx (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2013). Guidance manual on value transfer methods for ecosystem services publishing services section. Nairobi-Kenya: UNON.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phoebe Koundouri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simal, P.D. et al. (2017). Socio-economic Assessment of a Selected Multi-use Offshore Site in the Atlantic. In: Koundouri, P. (eds) The Ocean of Tomorrow. Environment & Policy, vol 56. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55772-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics