Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((CSBE,volume 127))

  • 951 Accesses

Abstract

With the published report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School (1968), many scholars and medical practitioners began to abandon the traditional cardio-pulmonary criterion for determining when a human being has died and to argue that, since the brain is the central organ which regulates the body’s vital metabolic functions, irreversible cessation of the functioning of the brain as a whole—cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and brain stem—constitutes death. This “whole-brain” criterion is based on the understanding that a human organism cannot function as a unified whole without a functioning brain. The whole-brain criterion has received nearly universal legislative approval, beginning with a report by the U.S. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1981). Soon thereafter, the Catholic Magisterium began to affirm this criterion following the conclusions of two interdisciplinary working groups sponsored by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (Chagas 1986; White et al. 1992). Pope John Paul II (2001) later reaffirmed magisterial support of the whole-brain criterion for determining when a human being has died.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School. 1968. A definition of irreversible coma. Journal of the American Medical Association 205: 337–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBS News. 2015. Family continues legal battle to have brain-dead girl declared alive. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-continues-legal-battle-to-have-brain-dead-girl-declared-alive. Accessed 12 Mar 2016.

  • Chagas, Carlos, ed. 1986. Working group on the artificial prolongation of life and the determination of the exact moment of death. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 2007. Responses to certain questions of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops concerning artificial nutrition and hydration. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070801_risposte-usa_en.html. Accessed 11 Mar 2016.

  • de Mattei, Roberto, ed. 2006. Finis vitae: Is brain death still life? Rome: Rubbettino Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, Ronald P., and James J. Walter, eds. 2007. Artificial nutrition and hydration and the permanently unconscious patient: The Catholic debate. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Paul II. 2001. Address to the international congress on transplants. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 1 (1): 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Address to the participants in the international congress on “Life–sustaining treatments and vegetative state: Scientific advances and ethical dilemmas.” http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/2004/march/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20040320_congress-fiamc_en.html. Accessed 11 Mar 2016.

  • Magister, Sandro. 2008. Transplants and brain death: L’Osservatore Romano has broken the taboo. http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/206476?eng=y&refresh_ce. Accessed 11 Mar 2016.

  • Pius XII. 1958. The prolongation of life. The Pope Speaks 4: 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1981. Defining death: Medical, legal, and ethical issues in the definition of death. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewmon, D. Alan. 1985. The metaphysics of brain death, persistent vegetative state, and dementia. The Thomist 49: 24–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Recovery from brain death: A neurologist’s apologia. The Linacre Quarterly 64: 30–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Brainstem death,’ ‘brain death’ and death: A critical re-evaluation of the purported equivalence. Issues in Law and Medicine 14: 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The brain and somatic integration: Insights into the standard biological rationale for equating ‘brain death’ with death. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26: 457–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorondo, Marcelo Sánchez, ed. 2007. Working group on the signs of death. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefsen, Christopher, ed. 2008. Artificial nutrition and hydration: The new Catholic debate. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. 2009. Ethical and religious directives for Catholic health care services. 5th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, Robert. 1988. Whole-brain, neocortical, and higher brain related concepts. In Death: Beyond whole-brain criteria, ed. R. Zaner. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Robert J., Heinz Angstwurm, and Ignacio Carrasco de Paula, eds. 1992. Working group on the determination of brain death and its relationship to human death. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason T. Eberl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eberl, J.T. (2017). Introduction. In: Eberl, J. (eds) Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics. Philosophy and Medicine(), vol 127. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55766-3_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics