Abstract
Organ transplantation is firmly embedded within gift-of-life discourse, which holds the potential to prescribe the transplant experience , and recipients’ moral reckoning of it. This is arguably no more so than where recipients, having received the scarce and precious gift-of-life , live in constant awareness that they are being scrutinised and judged as to their worthiness of the gift. This chapter is based on qualitative research conducted in Australia with heart, liver and kidney recipients . Rather than treating the experiences of organ transplant recipients as homogeneous, I suggest that differing emotional and social values are ascribed to organs by transplant recipients, and the particular organ received is powerfully consequential for the psychosocial experience of transplantation and the ways in which recipients make meaning of their experience.
We are left to invent a new way of being human where bodily parts go into each other’s bodies, redesigning the landscape of boundaries in the habit of what we are so definitively used to call (sic) distinct bodies … My life in its contingency mirrors the history of techniques, the growing know-how about human bodies, which knows nothing about the lived-bodies that can and will come from it. (Varela 2001: 260–261)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayhakki, B. & Hatthakit, U. (2012). Lived experiences of patients on hemodialysis: A meta-synthesis. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 39, 295–304.
Billington, E., Simpson, J., Unwin, J., Bray, D., & Giles, D. (2008). Does hope predict adjustment to end-stage renal failure and consequent dialysis? British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 683–699.
Cheek, J. (2008). Healthism: A new conservatism? Qualitative Health Research, 18, 974–982.
Clarkson, K. A., & Robinson, K. (2010). Life on dialysis: A lived experience. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 37, 29–35.
Crawford, R. (2006). Health as a meaningful social practice. Health, 10, 401–420.
Crowley-Matoka, M. (2005). Desperately seeking “normal”: The promise and perils of living with kidney transplantation. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 821–831.
Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
Exline, J. J. (2012). Humility and the ability to receive from others. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 31, 40–50.
Exline, J. J., Lisan, A. M., & Lisan, E. R. (2012). Reflecting on acts of kindness toward the self: Emotions, generosity, and the role of social norms. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 45–56.
Fisher, J. D., Nadler, A., & Whitcher-Alagna, S. (1982). Recipient reactions to aid. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 27–54.
Fok, S. K., Chair, S. Y., & Lopez, V. (2005). Sense of coherence, coping and quality of life following a critical illness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49, 173–181.
Fox, R. C., & Swazey, J. P. (2002). The courage to fail: A social view of organ transplants and dialysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Galvin, R. (2002). Disturbing notions of chronic illness and individual responsibility: Towards a genealogy of morals. Health, 6, 107–137.
Gill, P., & Lowes, L. (2008). Gift exchange and organ donation: Donor and recipient experiences of live related kidney transplantation. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 1607–1617.
Gunnarson, M. (2012). Concealed by the “gift of life”: The complexities of living with dialysis and kidney transplantation in Stockholm and Riga. In M. Gunnarson & F. Svenaeus (Eds.). The body as gift, resource, and commodity: Exchanging organs, tissues, and cells in the 21st century. Stockholm: Södertörns högsköla. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3801661.
Jonsen, A. R. (2012). The ethics of organ transplantation: A brief history. American Medical Association Journal of Ethics, 14, 264–268.
Kierans, C. (2005). Narrating kidney disease: The significance of sensation and time in the employment of patient experience. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 29, 341–359.
Kierans, C. (2011). Anthropology, organ transplantation and the immune system: Resituating commodity and gift exchange. Social Science and Medicine, 73, 1469–1476.
Lambert, N. M., Graham, S. M., Fincham, F. D., & Stillman, T. F. (2009). A changed perspective: How gratitude can affect sense of coherence through positive reframing. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 461–470.
Mauss, M. (1970). The gift (I. Cunnison, Trans.). London: Cohen & West.
McCullough, M. E., & Tsang, J. (2004). Parent of the virtues?: The prosocial contours of gratitude. In R. A. Emmons & M. E. McCullough (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Neuberger, J., Adams, D., MacMaster, P., Maidment, A., & Speed, M. (1998). Assessing priorities for allocation of donor liver grafts: Survey of public and clinicians. British Medical Journal, 317, 172–175.
O’Brien, G. M., Donaghue, N., Walker, I., & Wood, C. A. (2014). Deservingness and gratitude in the context of heart transplantation. Qualitative Health Research, 24, 1635–1647.
Orr, A., Wilis, S., Holmes, M., Britton, P., & Orr, D. (2007). Living with a kidney transplant: A qualitative investigation of quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 653–662.
Pringle, J., Drummond, J., McLafferty, E., & Hendry, C. (2011). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: A discussion and critique. Nurse Researcher, 18, 20–24.
Ratcliffe, J. (2000). Public preferences for the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation. Health Economics, 9, 137–148.
Russ, A. J., Shim, J. K., & Kaufman, S. R. (2007). The value of “life at any cost”: Talk about stopping kidney dialysis. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 2236–2247.
Schulz, T., Niesing, J., Stewart, R. E., Westerhuis, R., Hagedoorn, M., Ploeg, R. J., et al. (2012). The role of personal characteristics in the relationship between health and psychological distress among kidney transplant recipients. Social Science and Medicine, 75, 1547–1554.
Sharp, L. A. (1995). Organ transplantation as a transformative experience: Anthropological insights into the restructuring of the self. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 9(3), 357–389.
Sharp, L. A. (2001). Commodified Kin: Death, mourning, and competing claims on the bodies of organ donors in the United States. American Anthropologist, 103, 112–133.
Shaw, R. (2012). Thanking and reciprocating under the New Zealand organ donation system. Health, 16(3), 298–313.
Shaw, R. M. (2015a). Expanding the conceptual toolkit of organ gifting. Sociology of Health and Illness, 37, 952–966.
Shaw, R. M. (2015b). Being-in-dialysis: The experience of the machine-body for home dialysis users. Health, 19, 229–244.
Shaw, R., Bell, L., & Webb, R. (2012). ‘New Zealanders’ perceptions of gift and giving back as participants of organ transfer procedures. Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 7(1), 26–36.
Siminoff, L. A., & Chillag, K. (1999). The fallacy of the “Gift of Life”. Hastings Center Report, 29, 34–41.
Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 491–522.
Smith, J. A. (2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5, 9–27.
Sothern, M., & Dickinson, J. (2011). Repaying the gift of life: Self-help, organ transfer and the debt of care. Social and Cultural Geography, 12, 889–903.
Sque, M., & Payne, S. A. (1994). Gift exchange theory: A critique in relation to organ transplantation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 45–51.
Svenaeus, F. (2012). The phenomenology of organ transplantation: How does the malfunction and change of organs have effects on personal identity. In M. Gunnarson & F. Svenaeus (Eds.). The body as gift, resource, and commodity: Exchanging organs, tissues, and cells in the 21st century. Stockholm: Södertörns högsköla. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3801661.
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.
Teigen, K. C., & Jensen, T. K. (2011). Unlucky victims or lucky survivors? Spontaneous counterfactual thinking by families exposed to the Tsunami disaster. European Psychologist, 16, 48–57.
Ubel, P. A., Jepson, C., Baron, J., Mohr, T., McMorrow, S., & Asch, D. A. (2001). Allocation of transplantable organs: Do people want to punish patients for causing their illness? Liver Transplantation, 7, 600–607.
Varela, F. J. (2001). Intimate distances: Fragments for a phenomenology of organ transplantation. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 259–271. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jcs/2001/00000008/F0030005/1217.
Walker, M. U. (2009). Introduction: Groningen naturalism in bioethics. In H. Lindemann, M. Verkerk, & M. U. Walker (Eds.), Naturalized bioethics: Toward responsible knowing and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wittenberg, E., Goldie, S. J., Fischhoff, B., & Graham, J. D. (2003). Rationing decisions and individual responsibility for illness: Are all lives equal? Medical Decision Making, 23, 194–211.
Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Stewart, N., & Joseph, S. (2008). Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 621–632.
Zeiler, K. (2014). Neither property right nor heroic gift, neither sacrifice nor aporia: The benefit of the theoretical lens of sharing in donation ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 17(2), 171–181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Brien, G. (2017). Gift-of-life? The Psychosocial Experiences of Heart, Liver and Kidney Recipients. In: Shaw, R. (eds) Bioethics Beyond Altruism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55531-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55532-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)