Abstract
Commercial surrogacy is prohibited in many countries, and there are a number of convincing reasons why it should remain so. We accept the reasons, but argue that fairness requires that surrogates be compensated for their labour as well as the risks they undertake. It is a mistake to equate compensated surrogacy with commercial surrogacy. In order to safeguard against the risk of exploitation and other harmful and unethical practices, we propose organizing surrogacy along the lines of professions such as nursing and teaching. This would involve establishing a professional body, which will be charged with the task of regulating fees , licensing, and monitoring clinics that offer surrogacy services, and screening and registering surrogates. We think a similar model can be used in the case of live organ donation as well as gamete and embryo donation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
All about surrogacy.com. (2016). Sample GS contract. http://www.allaboutsurrogacy.com/sample_contracts/GScontract1.htm.
Almeling, R. (2009). Gender and the value of bodily goods: Commodification in egg and sperm donation. Law and Contemporary Problems, 72(3), 37–58.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (1992). Ethical issues in surrogate motherhood. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 31, 139–144.
Badcock, C. R. (1986). The problem of altruism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
British Medical Association. (1996). Changing conceptions of motherhood: The practice of surrogacy in Britain. London: British Medical Association.
Campanile, C. (2015). Dad demands abortion after surrogate learns she’s having triplets. New York Post, Retrieved from http://nypost.com/2015/11/25/surrogate-carrying-triplets-says-dad-demanding-she-abort-one/.
Carbone, J. & Madeira, J. L. (2015). The role of agency: Compensated surrogacy and the institutionalization of assisted reproduction practices, 90(7) Washington Law Review Online.
Carr, D. (1999). Professional education and professional ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 16(1), 33–46.
Choi, H., et al. (2012). Decision making following a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: An integrative review. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 57(2), 156–164.
Ciccarelli, J. C., & Beckman, L. J. (2005). Navigating rough waters: An overview of psychological aspects of surrogacy. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 21–43.
ConceiveAbilities. (2016a). Gestational surrogate program fee schedule—2012. Retrieved from https://www.conceiveabilities.com/pdf_forms/SurrogacyFee_Schedule2012.pdf.
ConceiveAbilities. (2016b). Surrogacy requirements. Retrieved from https://www.conceiveabilities.com/surrogates/surrogate-requirements.
Conley, K., & Campanile, C. (2015). Second surrogate mom steps forward with abortion battle. New York Post, Retrieved from http://nypost.com/2015/11/26/second-surrogate-mom-steps-forward-with-abortion-battle/.
Culyer, A. J. (1973). Quids without quos—A praxeological approach. In A. Alchian et al. (Eds.), The economics of charity: Essays on the comparative economics and ethics of giving and selling, with applications to blood (pp. 33–61). London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Davis, N. (1988). Reproductive technologies and our attitudes towards children. Logos, 9, 51–77.
Drabiak, K., et al. (2007). Ethics, law, and commercial surrogacy: A call for uniformity. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 35, 303–305.
Drabiak-Syed, K. (2011). Waiving informed consent to prenatal screening and diagnosis? Problems with paradoxical negotiation in surrogacy contracts. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 39(3), 559–564.
Fischer, R. (2011). Surrogacy. OHbaby! Magazine, 14. Retrieved from http://www.ohbaby.co.nz/conception/surrogacy/.
Gerber, P., & O’Byrne, K. (2015). Souls in the house of tomorrow: The rights of children born via surrogacy. In P. Gerber & K. O’Byrne (Eds.), Surrogacy, law and human rights (pp. 81–112). Burlington: Ashgate.
Koehn, D. (1994). The ground of professional ethics. London: Routledge.
Laufer-Ukeles, P. (2013). Mothering for money: Regulating commercial intimacy. Indiana Law Journal, 88(4).
Millbank, J. (2015). Rethinking commercial surrogacy in Australia. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 12(3), 477–490.
Mussen, D. (2014). Surrogacy payment review urged. The Dominion Post, August 14, 2014.
Panitch, V. (2013). Global surrogacy: Exploitation to empowerment. Journal of Global Ethics, 9(3), 329–343.
Ragoné, H. (1994). Surrogate motherhood: Conception in the heart. Boulder: Westview Press.
Rudrappa, S., & Collins, C. (2015). Altruistic agencies and compassionate consumers: Moral framing of transnational surrogacy. Gender & Society, 29(6), 937–959.
Shaw, R. M., & Bell, L. J. (2015). Because you can’t live on love: Living kidney donors perspectives on compensation and payment for donation. Health Expectations, 18(6), 3201–3212.
Trenwith, C. (2010). Surrogacy payments Difficult to Stop. Brisbane Times, February 12, 2010.
van den Akker, O. (2003). Genetic and gestational surrogate mothers experience of surrogacy’. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 21(2), 145–161.
van Mook, W. N. K. A., et al. (2009). Professionalism: Evolution of the concept. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 20, e82.
van Zyl, L., & Walker, R. (2013). Beyond altruistic and commercial contract motherhood: The professional model. Bioethics, 27(7), 373–381.
Walker, R., & van Zyl, L. (2015). Surrogate motherhood and abortion for fetal abnormality. Bioethics, 29(8), 529–535.
Walker, R., & van Zyl, L. (2016). Altruism and generosity in surrogate motherhood. Research in Ethical Issues in Organisations, 15, 121–133.
Woulfe, C. (2013). The untold story of NZ’s surrogate babies. New Zealand Listener. Retrieved September 26, from http://www.listener.co.nz/current-affairs/the-untold-story-of-nzs-surrogate-babies/.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Rhonda Shaw and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walker, R., van Zyl, L. (2017). Beyond Altruism: A Case for Compensated Surrogate Motherhood. In: Shaw, R. (eds) Bioethics Beyond Altruism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55531-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55532-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)