Advertisement

The Promotion and Development of Interest: The Importance of Perceived Values

  • Chris S. HullemanEmail author
  • Dustin B. Thoman
  • Anna-Lena Dicke
  • Judith M. Harackiewicz
Chapter

Abstract

It is tempting to consider the development of interest as an intra-individual process. That is, whether a person becomes interested in a topic can be attributed mostly to individual differences in temperament and personality characteristics. However, motivation in general, and interest development in particular, is also a social phenomenon that may be influenced by one’s interactions with people while engaging in the activity of interest. In this chapter, we first outline the role of perceived value in the development of interest. Second, we review a program of research designed to enhance interest by facilitating perceptions of value for an activity. Third, we discuss how other people in our lives both directly and indirectly influence value and, as a result, the development of interest. Although the majority of the extant research literature is focused on direct interventions to influence value, and thereby interest, we outline several indirect pathways through which the social context can also contribute to an individual’s perception of value. We encourage researchers to explore the direct and indirect influences of the social context on value through both observational and experimental studies so that we can discover additional mechanisms that help explain how interest develops.

Keywords

Interest development Value Social influence Social context Interventions Motivation 

References

  1. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Leibham, M. E. (2015). Emerging individual interests related to science in young children. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 261–280). Washington, DC: American.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, J., Muragishi, G. A., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., & Brown, E. R. (2015). To grab and to hold: Cultivating communal goals to overcome cultural and structural barriers in first generation college students’ science interest. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1, 331–341.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, L. W., Jacobs, J., Schramm, S., & Splittgerber, F. (2000). School transitions: Beginning of the end or new beginning? International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6), 359–372.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Bong, M. (2001). Role of self-efficacy and task-value in predicting college students’ course performance and future enrollment intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 553–570.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, E. R., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., Allen, J., & Muragishi, G. (2015). From bench to bedside: A communal utility value intervention to enhance students’ science motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 1116–1135.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, E. R., Thoman, D. B., Smith, J. L., & Diekman, A. B. (2015). Closing the communal goal gap: The importance of communal affordances in science career motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 662–673.Google Scholar
  10. Canning, E. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). Teach it, don’t preach it: The differential effects of directly-communicated and self-generated utility–value information. Motivation Science, 1(1), 47–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole, J. S., Bergin, D. A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2008). Predicting student achievement for low stakes tests with effort and task value. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook, T. D. (2002). Randomized experiments in educational policy research: A critical examination of the reasons the educational evaluation community has offered for not doing them. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21, 1051–1057.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How personal interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 597–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Durik, A. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). One size fits some: Instructional enhancements to promote interest don’t work the same for everyone. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 49–62). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  18. Durik, A. M., Shechter, O., Noh, M. S., Rozek, C. R., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). What if I can’t? Perceived competence as a moderator of the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 104–118.Google Scholar
  19. Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eccles, J. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  22. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507–537. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Perceived learning environments and students’ emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 478–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Brisson, B. M., Häfner, I., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Fostering adolescents’ value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1226–1240. doi: 10.1037/dev0000028.
  26. Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Schreier, B., Häfner, I., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2015). More value through greater differentiation: Gender differences in value beliefs about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 663–677. doi: 10.1037/edu0000003.
  27. Gniewosz, B., Eccles, J. S., & Noack, P. (2015). Early adolescents’ development of academic self‐concept and intrinsic task value: The role of contextual feedback. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(3), 459–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Conducting social psychological research in educational settings: “Lessons we learned in school”. In A. T. Panter, C. Sansone, & C. C. Morf (Eds.), The sage handbook of methods in social psychology (pp. 471–484). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Carter, S. M., Lehto, A. T., & Elliot, A. J. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1284–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745–765. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000075.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink, E. A., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Hulleman, C. S. (2010). The importance of interest: The role of achievement goals and task values in promoting the development of interest. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 42–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00207.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Knogler, M. (2017). Interest: Theory and application. In A. J. Elliot, D. Yeager, & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (Second Edition): Theory and application. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  36. Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 43, 899–906. doi: 10.1177/0956797611435530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 220–227. doi: 10.1177/2372732216655542.
  38. Harackiewicz, J. M., Tibbetts, Y, Canning, E. A., & Hyde, J. S. (2014). Harnessing values to promote motivation in education. In S. Karabenick & T. Urden (Eds.), Motivational interventions, Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 18, pp 71–105). Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students’ recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hulleman, C. S., & Barron, K. E. (2016). Motivation interventions in education: Bridging theory, research, and practice. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 160–171). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  42. Hulleman, C. S., Dicke, A., Kosovich, J., & Thoman, D. (2016, January). The role of perceived social norms and parents’ value in the development of interest in biology. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  43. Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410–1412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hulleman, C. S., Hendricks, B., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007, April). The role of utility value in promoting classroom interest. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  47. Hulleman, C. S., Kosovich, J. J., Barron, K. E., & Daniel, D. (2017). Making connections: Replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 387–404.Google Scholar
  48. Jackson, M.C., Galvez, G., Landa, I., Buonora, P., & Thoman, D. B. (2016). Science that matters: The importance of a cultural connection in underrepresented students’ science pursuit. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15, 1–12.Google Scholar
  49. Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Parents, task values, and real-life achievement-related choices. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 405–439). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jacobs, J. E., Davis-Kean, P., Bleeker, M., Eccles, J. S., & Malanchuk, O. (2005). I can, but I don’t want to: The impact of parents, interests, and activities on gender differences in math. In A. Gallagher & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender difference in mathematics (pp. 246–263). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Jacobs, J. E., Vernon, M. K., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Activity choices in middle childhood: The roles of gender, self-beliefs, and parents’ influence. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 235–254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  53. Juvonen, J., Espinoza, G., & Knifsend, C. (2012). The role of peer relationships in student academic and extracurricular engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 387–401). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kindermann, T. A. (2007). Effects of naturally existing peer groups on changes in academic engagement in a cohort of sixth graders. Child Development, 78(4), 1186–1203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01060.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Knogler, M., Harackiewicz, J. M., Gegenfurtner, A., & Lewalter, D. (2015). How situational is situational interest? Investigating the longitudinal structure of situational interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 39–50.Google Scholar
  56. Leibham, M. B., Alexander, J. M., & Johnson, K. E. (2005). Parenting behaviors associated with the maintenance of preschoolers’ interests: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  58. Mac Iver, D. J., Stipek, D. J., & Daniels, D. H. (1991). Explaining within-semester changes in student effort in junior high school and senior high school courses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Master, A., Butler, L. P, & Walton, G. M. (2017). How the subjective relationship between the self, others, and a task drives interest. In P. A. O’Keefe & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), The science of interest. Cham: Springer, (this volume).Google Scholar
  60. McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Meade, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morgan, C., Isaac, J. D., & Sansone, C. (2001). The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles, 44(5–6), 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. O’Keefe, P. A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The role of interest in optimizing performance and self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Parker, J. G., Rubin, K. H., Erath, S. A., Wojslawowicz, J. C., & Buskirk, A. A. (2006). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In D. C. D. J. Cohen (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology, Vol 1: Theory and method (2nd ed., pp. 419–493). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  66. Patall, E. A., Dent, A. L., Oyer, M., & Wynn, S. R. (2013). Student autonomy and course value: The unique and cumulative roles of various teacher practices. Motivation and Emotion, 37(1), 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 243–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373–404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Renninger, K., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46, 168–184. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.587723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Renninger, K. A., & Su, S. (2012). Interest and its development. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 167–187). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (1998). Academic and emotional functioning in early adolescence: Longitudinal relations, patterns, and prediction by experience in middle school. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 321–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ross, L., Lepper, M., & Ward, A. (2010). Major developments in five decades of social psychology. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. I, 5th ed., pp. 3–50). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  76. Rozek, C. S., Hyde, J. S., Svoboda, R. C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2014). Gender differences in the effects of a utility-value intervention to help parents motivate adolescents in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rozek, C. S., Svoboda, R. C., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2017). Utility-value intervention with parents increases students’ STEM preparation and career pursuit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 114, 909–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ryan, A. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of Adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 101–111. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3502_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135–1150. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Shechter, O. G., Durik, A. M., Miyamoto, Y., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). The role of utility value in achievement behavior: The importance of culture. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 303–317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  83. Schreier, B., Dicke, A.-L., Gaspard, H., Häfner, I., Flunger, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2014). Der Wert von Mathematik im Klassenzimmer: Die Bedeutung relevanzbezogener Unterrichtsmerkmale für die Wertüberzeugungen der Schülerinnen und Schüler [The value of mathematics in the classroom: The importance of a relevanceoriented learning environment for students’ value beliefs]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(2), 225–255. doi: 10.1007/s11618-014-0537-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you’ll know what you learn! British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 343–360.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Smith, J. L., Cech, E., Metz, A., Huntoon, M., & Moyer, C. (2014). Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 413–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Swann, W. B., & Bosson, J. K. (2008). Identity negotiation: A theory of self and social interaction. In J. P. Oliver, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 448–471). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  87. Thoman, D. B., Brown, E. R., Mason, A. Z., Harmsen, A. G., & Smith, J. L. (2015). The role of altruistic values in motivating underrepresented minority students for biomedicine. Bioscience, 65, 183–188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Thoman, D. B., Sansone, C., & Geerling, D. (2017). The dynamic nature of interest: Embedding interest within self-regulation. In P. A. O’Keefe & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), The science of interest. Cham: Springer, (this volume).Google Scholar
  89. Tice, D. M., & Wallace, H. M. (2003). The reflected self: Creating yourself (as you think) other see you. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 91–105). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  90. Tibbetts, Y., Harackiewicz, J. M., Priniski, S. J., & Canning, E. A. (2016). Broadening participation in the life sciences with social–psychological interventions. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(3), es4. doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. Updegraff, K. A., Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., & O’Brien, K. M. (1996). Course enrollment as self-regulatory behavior: Who takes optional high school math courses? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vallerand, R. J. (2017). On the two faces of passion: The harmonious and the obsessive. In P. A. O’Keefe & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), The Science of Interest. Cham: Springer, (this volume).Google Scholar
  93. Wang, M. (2012). Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1643–1657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Xiang, P., Chen, A., & Bruene, A. (2005). Interactive Impact of Intrinsic Motivators and Extrinsic Rewards on Behavior and Motivation Outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 179–197.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris S. Hulleman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dustin B. Thoman
    • 2
  • Anna-Lena Dicke
    • 3
  • Judith M. Harackiewicz
    • 4
  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.University of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations