Skip to main content

Brexit and EU Regulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Arguments over regulation are a central feature of the antagonistic British relationship with the EU. Many Britons think that continental Europeans are more inclined to regulate markets than the UK, and that as the EU itself has become so intrusive, the UK is subject to regulations that damage the economy by imposing large and mostly unnecessary burdens on British businesses. Yet the evidence supports a different narrative: while the EU’s single market is incomplete, especially in services, its efforts to reduce the cost of trade through common rules and standards have been modestly successful. And, in the negotiation over its future relationship with the EU, the UK will face a difficult trade-off between regulatory sovereignty and access to EU markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Marilena Angeli and Shahzad Gitay, ‘Bonus regulation: Aligning reward with risk in the banking sector’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Q4 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katinka Barysch, ‘The working time directive: What’s all the fuss about?’, Centre for European Reform, April 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen Booth and others, ‘Still out of control? Measuring eleven years of EU regulation’, Open Europe, June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claudia Buch and others, ‘Cross-border diversification in bank asset portfolios’, International Finance, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business for Britain, ‘Setting out the British option: Liberating 95 per cent of UK businesses from EU red tape’, January 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Economic Policy Research, ‘Twenty years on: The UK and the future of the single market’, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tim Congdon, ‘How much does the EU cost Britain?’, UK Independence Party, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Trade Union Confederation, ‘Trends in working time’, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabienne Ilzkovitz and others, ‘Steps towards a deeper economic integration: The internal market in the 21st century - A contribution to the Single Market Review’, European Commission, European Economy Economic Papers, January 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund, ‘Technical note on financial integration and fragmentation in the European Union’, March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barba Navaretti and others, ’Multinational banking in Europe: Financial stability and regulatory implications’, Economic Policy, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of National Statistics, ‘UK trade: June 2016’, Statistical bulletin, August 9, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development, ‘Going for growth country notes: United Kingdom’, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dani Rodrik, ’The globalization paradox: democracy and the future of the world economy’, W.W. Norton, February 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dani Rodrik, ‘The future of European democracy’, Institute of Advanced Studies, December 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saskia Sassen, ‘The global city: New York, London, Tokyo’, Princeton University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirk Schoenmaker and Wolf Wagner, ‘The impact of cross-border banking on financial stability’, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Springford, ‘How to build EU services markets’, Centre for European Reform, October 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung, ‘20 Jahre Binnenmarkt: Wachstumseffekte der zunehmenden europäischen Integration’, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxpayers’ Alliance, ‘The great European rip-off: a background note explaining the new estimated total cost of the EU’, March 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon Tilford, ‘Why British prosperity is hobbled by a rigged land market’, Centre for European Reform, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, ‘Cut EU red tape: Report from the Business Taskforce’, February 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. (2013, October). Waste electrical and electronic equipment system impact assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip Whyte, ‘Britain, Europe, the City of London: Can the triangle be managed?’, Centre for European Reform, July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Willetts, ‘Eight great technologies’, Policy Exchange, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Springford .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Springford, J. (2017). Brexit and EU Regulation. In: Campos, N., Coricelli, F. (eds) The Economics of UK-EU Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55495-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55495-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55494-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55495-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics