Advertisement

Planning Archaeology in World Cities: Looking at London

  • Hana Morel
  • Joseph Flatman
  • Kim Stabler
Chapter

Abstract

The UK’s long history in archaeology owes much of its origins, principles and pursuits to the practices of amateur archaeologists. It has come a long way since its Antiquarian eighteenth-century origins, with its foundations and values shaken by its gradual move towards the predominantly developer-funded profession that it is today. While the UK profession comes to grips with a series of planning policy statements and guidance published since the 1990s, local archaeologists continually renegotiate their roles and responsibilities with politicians, developers, the public and most notably themselves. London’s archaeology is overseen through a complex, and unique, mixture of local and central government controls due to the distinctive political structures of ‘Greater London’ with its overlapping borough, district and city responsibilities. Following national planning policy approaches developed since the 1990s by the government, the majority of actual physical fieldwork undertaken is contracted out through a competitive tendering process. Through a period of uncertainty during the Thatcherite era, the practice of archaeology in London reinvented itself alongside the ongoing survival and activities from communities, local societies and national organisations in the 1990s and 2000s, allowing for colourful—and sometimes contentious—outcomes that can work both for and against archaeology. Now, as neoliberal governance takes hold, dire cuts in government funding since 2010, together with a deregulatory agenda mean that environmental concerns like archaeology are increasingly sidelined. As a consequence, London’s archaeologists have to find more creative and innovative ways to protect and preserve the city’s heritage.

Keywords

London archaeology Historic environment National Planning Policy Framework PPG16 Rose theatre 

References

  1. Aitchison, K. (2009). Feature editorial. British Archaeology, (Issue 107).Google Scholar
  2. Aitchison, K. (2012). Breaking New Ground. Landward Research Publication. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
  3. Biddle, M. (1984). London on the Strand. Popular Archaeology, (July), 23–7.Google Scholar
  4. Biddle, M., Hudson, D. & Heighway, C. (1973). The Future of London’s Past: a survey of the archaeological implications of planning and development in the nation’s capital. Rescue publication No. 4.Google Scholar
  5. Bird, J., Graham, A. H., Sheldon, H., & Townend, P. (1978). Southwark excavations 1972–74. London: London and Middlesex Society & Surrey Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
  6. Cowie, R., & Whytehead, R. (1989). Lundenwic: the archaeological evidence for middle Saxon London. Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Environment. (1990). Archaeology and planning, PPG 16. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  8. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2010). Planning for the historic environment, PPS 5. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  9. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2012). National Planning Policy Framework. London: HMSO. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdf
  10. Flatman, J., & Perring, D. (2012). The national planning policy framework and archaeology: a discussion. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 22, 4–38. Retrieved from http://www.pia-journal.co.uk/issue/view/24
  11. Flatman, J. (2012). The Past, present and future of rescue archaeology in England. Post-Classical Archaeologies, 2279–98.Google Scholar
  12. Greater London Authority (GLA). (2014). Cultural Metropolis. London: GLA. Retrieved from: https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/cultural_metropolis_2014.pdf
  13. Historic England. (2016). Greater London archaeology advisory service. Retrieved from: https://historicengland.org.uk/services-skills/our-planning-services/greater-london-archaeology-advisory-service
  14. London Archaeologist. (2016). Journal, London Archaeologist. Retrieved From: http://www.londonarchaeologist.org.uk
  15. London Consensus: http://data.london.gov.uk/census/data/. Accessed December 12, 2014.
  16. Lyon, J. (2007). The Temple of Mithras: changing heritage values in the City of London 1954–2006. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 9(1), 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marsden, P. (1980). Roman London. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. Marsden, P. (1996). The beginnings of archaeology in the city of London. In J. Bird et al. (Eds.), 1978 Southwark Excavations 1972–74. London: London and Middlesex Society & Surrey Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
  19. Merrifield, R. (1965). The Roman City of London. Tonbridge: Benn.Google Scholar
  20. Museum of London Archaeology. (2014). Oral history project celebrates Roman Temple of Mithras. Past Horizons. September 23, 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.pasthorizonspr.com/index.php/archives/23/2014/oral-history-project-celebrates-roman-temple-of-mithras
  21. Museum of London Archaeology. (2016a). Museum of London Archaeological Archive Retrieved from: http://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/collections-research/laarc/
  22. Museum of London Archaeology. MOLA. (2016b). CITiZAN (Coastal and Intertidal Zone Archaeological Network). Retrieved from: http://www.mola.org.uk/projects/research-and-community/citizan
  23. New York City Department of Planning, ‘The Newest New Yorkers – 2000 Edition’: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/census/nny_exec_sum.shtml. Accessed January 14, 2015.
  24. Orton, C. (1989). A tale of two sites. London Archaeologist, 6(3), 59–65.Google Scholar
  25. RESCUE. (2016). RESCUE—the British archaeological trust. Retrieved from: http://rescue-archaeology.org.uk/
  26. SAVE Britain’s Heritage. (2016). Retrieved From: http://www.savebritainsheritage.org/
  27. Sheldon, H., & Clark, J. (2008). Londinium and beyond: essays on Roman London and its hinterland for Harvey Sheldon. York: Council of British Archaeology.Google Scholar
  28. Shepherd, J. (1998). The temple of Mithras, London: excavations by W F Grimes and A Williams at the Walbrook. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
  29. Sheppard, F. (1991). The treasury of London’s Past, an historical account of the p and its predecessors, the Guildhall Museum and the London Museum. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  30. Sidell, J. (2012). Paris London: 150 years of site preservation. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 14(1–4), 372–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. UNESCO. (2016). World Heritage List—Tower of London. Retrieved from: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/488
  32. Walbrook Discovery. (2016). Walbrook Discovery Programme. Retrieved from: https://walbrookdiscovery.wordpress.com/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of ArchaeologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Historic EnglandLondonUK
  3. 3.Stabler HeritageLondonUK

Personalised recommendations