Advertisement

Model Building

  • Val Lowndes (Retired)
  • Stuart BerryEmail author
  • Marcello Trovati
  • Amanda Whitbrook
Chapter
Part of the Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications book series (SFMA)

Abstract

The purpose of system dynamics modelling is to develop understanding and then the improvement of systems. The first stage in this process is the construction of a logical model (influence diagram) to describe a system.

Keywords

Speech Recognition Share Price Sentiment Analysis Short Selling Formal Concept Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Pearl J (1998) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San FranciscozbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Trovati M, Bessis N (2015) An influence assessment method based on co-occurrence for topologically reduced sets. Soft Comput 20(5):2021–2030Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanchez-Graillet O, Poesio M (2004) Acquiring from text. LRECGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuipers BJ (1984) Causal reasoning in medicine: analysis of a protocol. Cogn Sci 8:363–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trovati M (2016) An overview of some theoretical topological aspects of big data, Big-Data analytics and cloud computing, theory, algorithms and applications, computer communications and networks, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liddy ED (2001) A robust risk minimization based named entity recognition system. In: Encyclopedia of library and information science. Marcel Decker, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laporte E (2005) Symbolic natural language processing. In: Lothaire (ed) Applied combinatorics on words, pp 164–209Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manning CD, Schutze H (1999) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Troussov A, Levner E, Bogdan C, Judge J, Botvich D (2010) Spreading activation methods. In: Dynamic and advanced data mining for progressing technological development: innovations and systemic approaches, pp 136–167Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dale R, Moisl H, Somers HL (2000) Handbook of natural language processing. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Korhonen AYK (2006) A large subcategorisation lexicon for natural language processing applications. In: Proceedings of LRECGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stumme G (1998) Efficient data mining based on formal concept analysis. Lecture Notes in Computer. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilks Y, Stevenson M (1998) The grammar of sense: using part-of-speech tags as a first step in semantic disambiguation. Nat Lang Eng 4:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Erman LD, Hayes-Roth F, Lesser VR, Reddy DR (1980) The Hearsay-II speech-understanding system: integrating knowledge to resolve uncertainty. ACM Comput Surv 12(2):213–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nii HP, Feigenbaum EA, Anton JJ, Rockmore AJ (1982) Signal-to-symbol transformation: HASP/SIAP case study. AI Mag 3:23–35Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fox CW, Evans MH, Pearson MJ, Prescott TJ (2012) Towards hierarchical blackboard mapping on a whiskered robot. Robot Auton Syst 60(11):1356–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sutton C, Morrison C, Cohen PR, Moody J, Adibi J (2004) A Bayesian blackboard for information fusion. In: Svensson P, Schubert J (eds) Proceedings of the seventh international conference on information fusion, pp 1111–1116Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Millington I, Funge J (2009) Artificial intelligence for games, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 459–466Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Corkill DD (1991) Blackboard systems. AI Expert 6(9):40–47Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carver N, Lesser V (1994) Evolution of blackboard control architectures. Expert Syst Appl 7:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pang GK-H (2009) Blackboard architecture for intelligent control. In: Unbehauen H (ed) Control systems, robotics and automation: and intelligent control systems, vol 17. EOLSS, Oxford, pp 303–316Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hayes-Roth B, Johnson V, Garvey A, Hewett M (1986) Application of the BB1 blackboard control architecture to arrangement-assembly tasks. Artif Intell 1(2):85–94Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Russell S, Norvig P (1995) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Russell S, Norvig P (2016) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 3rd edn. Pearson, HarlowzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carver N (1997) A revisionist view of blackboard systems, In: Proceedings of the 1997 midwest artificial intelligence and cognitive science society conference. The AAAI Press, Dayton, OhioGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gelenter D (1983) Generative communication in Linda. ACM Trans Program Lang Syst 7(1):80–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Engelmore RS, Morgan AJ, Nii HP (1988a) Introduction. In: Engelmore R, Morgan T (eds) Blackboard systems. Addison-Wesley, Boston, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Craig ID (1995) Blackboard systems. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jones J, Millington M, Ross P (1986) A blackboard shell in PROLOG. In: Proceedings ECAI-86, pp 428–436Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dodhiawala RT, Sridharam N, Pickering C (1989) A real-time blackboard architecture. In: Jagannathan V, Dodhiawala R, Baum L (eds) Blackboard architectures and applications. Academic Press Inc., San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Balzar R, Erman L, London P, Williams C (1980) HEARSAY-III: a domain-independent framework for expert systems. In: Proceedings of the first annual conference on artificial intelligence, pp 108–110Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hayes-Roth F, Waterman DA, Lenat DB (1983) Building expert systems. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Corkill DD, Gallagher KQ, Murray KE (1986) GBB: a generic blackboard development system. In: Proceedings of AAAI-86, pp 1008–1014Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Orkin J (2003) Applying blackboard systems to first person shooters. [online] slidepayer.com. Available at: web.media.mit.edu/~jorkin/utgameAI03-Orkin.ppt and http://slideplayer.com/slide/6102412/. Accessed 16 Apr 2016
  36. 36.
    Newell A (1962) Some problems of the basic organization in problem-solving programs. In: Yovits M, Jacobi G, Goldstein G (eds) Proceedings of the second conference of self-organising systems, pp 393–423Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hayes-Roth B, Hayes-Roth F, Rosenschein S, Cammarata S (1979) Modelling planning as an incremental, oppotunistic process. In: Proceedings IJCAI-79, pp 375–383Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zanconato (1988) BLOBS—an object-oriented blackboard system framework for reasoning in time. In: Engelmore R, Morgan T (eds) Blackboard systems. Addison-Wesley. Reading, pp 335–345Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reynolds D (1988) MUSE: A toolkit for embedded, real-time AI. In: Engelmore R, Morgan T (eds) Blackboard systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 519–532Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lesser VR, Corkill DD (1983) The distributed vehicle monitoring testbed: a tool for investigating distributed problem solving networks. AI Mag 4(3):15–33Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nii HP (1986b) CAGE and POLIGON: two frameworks for blackboard-based concurrent problem solving. Technical Report KSL-86-41. Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ensor JR, Gabbe JD (1986) Transactional blackboards. Int J Artif Intell Eng 1(2):80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Selfridge O (1959) Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning. In: Proceedings of symposium on the mechanisation of thought processes, pp 511–529Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nii HP (1986) Blackboard systems: the blackboard model of problem solving and the evolution of blackboard architectures. AI Mag 7(2):38Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Simon HA (1977) Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving. In: Models of discovery, Reidel, BostonGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Reddy DR, Erman LD, Neely RB (1973) A model and a system for machine recognition of speech. IEEE Trans Audio Electro Acoust AU-21:229–238Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Engelmore RS, Morgan AJ, Nii HP (1988) Hearsay-II. In: Engelmore R, Morgan T (eds) Blackboard systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 25–29Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lowerre BT, Reddy R (1980) The HARPY speech understanding system. In: Lea W (ed) Trends in speech recognition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Terry A (1988) Using explicit strategic knowledge to control expert systems. In: Engelmore R, Morgan T (eds) Blackboard systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 159–188Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Englemore RS, Terry A (1979) Structure and function of the CRYSALIS system. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-79, pp 250–256Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Carver N (1990) Sophisticated control for interpretation: planning to resolve sources of uncertainty. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Massachusetts, Computer and Information Science Department, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Carver N, Lesser V (1990) Control for interpretation: planning to resolve sources of uncertainty. Technical Report No. 90-53. University of Massachusetts, Computer and Information Science Department, Amherst, MAGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Feigenbaum EA, Nii HP (1978) Rule-based understanding of signals. In: Waterman D, Hayes-Roth F (eds) Pattern-directed inference systems. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Craig ID (1991) Formal specification of advanced AI architectures. Ellis Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Velthuijsen H (1992) The nature and applicability of the blackboard architecture. Ph. D. Thesis. Faculty of General Science, Limburg University, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Craig ID (1993) Formal techniques in the development of blackboard systems. Int J Pattern Recogn Artif Intell 7(2):197–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Whitehair R (1996) A framework for the analysis of sophisticated control. Ph. D. Thesis. University of Massachusetts. Computer Science DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Culliton P (2003) Implementing a blackboard-like system for squad-level combat AI Part I. [online] GameDev.net. Available at: http://www.gamedev.net/page/resources/_/technical/artificial-intelligence/implementing-a-blackboard-like-system-for-squad-r1931. Accessed 15 Sept 2016
  59. 59.
    Dill K (2014) Structural architecture—common tricks of the trade. In: Rabin S (ed) Game AI PRO: collected wisdom of game AI professionals. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Champandard AJ (2007) Using a static blackboard to store world knowledge. [online] aigamedev.com. Available at: http://aigamedev.com/open/article/static-blackboard/. Accessed 16 Apr 2016
  61. 61.
    Mark D (2010) Damián Isla Interview on Blackboard Arch. [online] intrinsicalgorithm.com. Available at: http://intrinsicalgorithm.com/IAonAI/2010/02/damian-isla-interview-on-blackboard-arch/. Accessed 19 Sept 2016
  62. 62.
    Khosravi H, Kabir E (2009) A blackboard approach towards an integrated Farsi OCR system. IJDAR 12(1):21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Val Lowndes (Retired)
    • 1
  • Stuart Berry
    • 2
    Email author
  • Marcello Trovati
    • 3
  • Amanda Whitbrook
    • 2
  1. 1.University of DerbyDerbyUK
  2. 2.College of Engineering and TechnologyUniversity of DerbyDerbyUK
  3. 3.Computer ScienceEdge Hill UniversityLancashireUK

Personalised recommendations