Abstract
The classical theist is seen to have a number of realist and anti-realist options open to him in meeting the challenge of indispensability arguments for Platonism. The most plausible response will involve challenging, with free logicians, neo-Meinongians, and neutralists, the neo-Quinean criterion of ontological commitment which lies at the heart of indispensability arguments. Beyond that the theist’s options are wide open for filling out his account with insights appropriated from a diversity of perspectives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Craig, W.L. (2017). Concluding Reflections. In: God and Abstract Objects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55384-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55384-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55383-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55384-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)