Advertisement

Romantic Relationships and Sexuality in Hebrew Advertisements 1967–1977

  • Avivit Agam Dali
Chapter

Abstract

Hebrew-language advertisements in the Israeli press stringently avoided any reference to intimacy or sex until the 1960s. Before the 1960s, the ideal depicted in advertising showed an individual or a group, with hardly any place for representations of couples of any type. During the 1960s, however, a huge change became discernible in advertisers’ attitudes to representations of romanticism and sexuality. Some of the products offered through the ads were associated with romance and functioned as aids to assist the progress of a romantic relationship. The rise of members of the “flower children” generation, who grew up to work in the advertising industry in Israel, contributed greatly to relatively crude representations of Israeli sexuality that burs through the ads. Increasingly, images of heterosexual relationships became legitimate sales promoters. Along with images of couples, semi-pornographic pictures were also used, focusing on women’s bodies and objectifying them.

Bibliography

  1. Agam Dali, Avivit. The Place That Lacks Locality—Ad Landscapes in Israel. Tel Aviv, Israel: Resling, 2010 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  2. Almog, Oz. Farewell to “Srulik”: Changing Values among the Israeli Elite. Haifa, Israel: Zmora Bitan Publishing, 2004. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  3. Bareli, Avi. “From a Public of Laborers to an ‘Orphaned’ Mob.” Eretz Aheret 12 (2002): 26–33 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  4. Barthes, Roland. Image, Music, Text, trans. R. Howard. London: Basil Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. Gertz, Nurith. Captive of a Dream National Myths in Israeli Culture. Tel Aviv, Israel: Am Oved. 1996. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  6. Hasson, Nir. “Demographic Debate Continues: How Many Palestinians Actually Live in the West Bank?” Haaretz Online. June 30, 2013. <http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.532703> (accessed October 16, 2016)
  7. Horowitz, Dan, Lissak, Moshe. Distress in Utopia. Tel Aviv, Israel: Am Oved, 1990 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  8. Margalit, Elkana, Karni, Moshe, and Zarhi, Shaul. Social Democracy vs. Capital Intensity. Tel Aviv, Israel: Sifriyat Poalim. 2000 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  9. Panofsky, Erwin. “Iconography and Iconology: An Introduction to the Study of Renaissance Art.” In Meaning in the Visual Arts. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970. 51–81.Google Scholar
  10. Shohat, Ella. Israeli Cinema: East/West and the Politics of Representation. Tel Aviv, Israel: Brerot, 1991 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  11. Svirsky, Shlomo. “‘There You’ll Meet Many New Immigrants at Your Age’: The School, The Army and the Construction of ‘Israeliness’.” In Seeds of Inequality. Tel Aviv, Israel: Brerot. 1995. 71–117 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avivit Agam Dali
    • 1
  1. 1.The Open UniversityRa’ananaIsrael

Personalised recommendations