Skip to main content

The Larger Urban Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Artistic Enclaves in the Post-Industrial City

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Sociology ((BRIEFSSOCY))

  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I briefly discuss the larger urban context of Lawrenceville’s artistic enclave (i.e., the City of Pittsburgh). I draw on secondary sources, and also utilize my field data and Art All Night Artist Survey data. I begin by presenting a brief overview of Pittsburgh’s transition from industrial to postindustrial city, and point out that it has not experienced widespread gentrification and astronomical increases in housing costs. I then discuss and evaluate Florida’s comments on its creative class, and proceed to assess some of the advantages and disadvantages of being a Pittsburgh artist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pittsburgh’s industrial age produced philanthropic organizations started by the Carnegies, the Fricks, the Heinz’s, and the Mellons, and left a legacy of major museums (The Carnegie Museum of Art, The Frick Art and Historical Center), three major universities (Carnegie Mellon, The University of Pittsburgh and Duquesne University), a top 25 arts college (at Carnegie Mellon), and architecturally interesting industrial age structures (Strickland 2004).

  2. 2.

    In 1994, another new museum, The Andy Warhol Museum, opened its doors in Pittsburgh.

  3. 3.

    Among 2009 Art All Night Survey respondents, the median rental cost was $565 per month, while the median home price (among artists who owned homes) was $94,000.

References

  • Abbing, H. (2002). Why are artists poor? The Exceptional economy of the arts. Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, D. (2003). New York Art, Pittsburgh Art. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 37(3), 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, D., DeMauro, K., Laffey, S., Leo, S-Y., Merker, L., McElwee, H., et al. (Student project) (2006). Strengthening relationships between artists and post-industrial Pennsylvania communities. Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currid, E. (2007). The Warhol economy: How fashion, art, and music drive New York City, by Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferman, B. (1996). Challenging the growth machine: Neighborhood politics in Chicago and Pittsburgh. Lawrence, Kan: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. L. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. L. (2012). The rise of the creative class revisited (Tenth Anniversary Edition). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottdiener, M., & Hutchinson, R. (2006). The new urban sociology (3rd ed.). New York City: Persus Books Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halasz, (2015). The bohemian ethos: Questioning work and making a scene on the lower east side. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, W. (2005). Industrial restructuring and urban change in the Pittsburgh region: Developmental, ecological, and socioeconomic trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 10(1), 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, R. D. (2006). Neo-Bohemia: Art and commerce in the postindustrial city. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubove, R. (1996). Twentieth-century Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press Digital Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, L. (2005). “Art in our Neighborhoods.” Carnegie Online

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A., & King, D. (2003). The artistic dividend: The arts’ hidden contributions to regional development. Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, T. (2012). Hamilton’s ‘Pittsburgh solution’: ‘Post-industrial’ as public policy. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Urban Affairs Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S., & Sullivan, D. M. (2011). “White night”: Gentrification, racial exclusion, and perceptions and participation in the Arts. City & Community, 10, 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, C. R. (1981). SoHo, the artist in the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streitfeld, D. (2009, January 8). For Pittsburgh, there’s life after steel. New York: New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, C. (2004). From rust belt to arts Mecca; Pittsburgh reaps the benefits of its 20-year investment in a downtown cultural district—And in the vitality of its young people. Christian Science Monitor, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2006, September). Pittsburgh: How now brown town? A former steel city is now proclaiming its cleaner land and clever minds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, S. (2008). Seven days in the art world. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, A., & Toepler, S. (1999). The subsidized muse: Government and the arts in western europe and the united states. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(1–2), 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbanbytes.blogspot.com. (2007). “John Morris: NYC Artist, Pittsburgh Gallery Owner and Raconteur, interviewed at Digging Pitt Gallery.” http://urbanbytes.blogspot.com/2007/10/john-morris-nyc-artist-pittsburgh.html

  • Vance, C. S. (1989). The war on culture + the public funding of controversial art works. New York: Brant Publishing Inc.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. (1982). Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Moss .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moss, G. (2017). The Larger Urban Context. In: Artistic Enclaves in the Post-Industrial City. SpringerBriefs in Sociology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55264-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55264-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55262-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55264-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics