Abstract
Subject/topic. The subject of the analysis is accumulated experience, principles, and contradictions of strategic planning of ecological development of Russia’s regions by the example of the Southern Federal District.
Goals/tasks. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the principles of E. Ostrom as a conceptual foundation for strategic planning of territories’ development; to determine the level of detail and complexity of ecological component of long-term strategies of socio-economic development of regions of the Southern Federal District; to identify typical problems and to develop recommendations for public authorities.
Methodology. The authors conduct comparative analysis of ecological component of regional strategies of socio-economic development, and substantiates—from the positions of systemic approach—the direction for increase of their complexity in the aspect of planning of ecological development.
Results. As a result of the research, it was found that ecological development is among the priorities of the federal policy and ideology, which does not find adequate systemic reflection in strategies of socio-economic development at district and regional levels. The article determines components of ecological component of strategies of socio-economic development of the SFD, finds unconformities of correlation of ecological policy of the SFD and its specific regions, finds and groups standard problems in the sphere of strategic planning of ecological development by the example of the regions of Southern Russia, and develops offers as to correction of typical structure of ecological block of strategies for development of the subjects of the RF for the purpose of increase of its detail and consistency.
Discussion/application. Results of the research could be used by the public authorities of federal districts and subjects of the RF during development or modernization of ecological blocks of strategies of socio-economic development and formation of specialized strategies of ecological development.
Conclusions/Significance. The authors make conclusion on lack of coordination of ecological policy of the SFD and its regions and fragmentarity of strategic planning of ecological development and offer recommendations for modernization of ecological block of regional strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Sustainable development: challenges of Rio. Report on human development in the Russian Federation for 2013./Edited by S.N. Bobylev. М.: RA ILF LLC, 2013. 202 P. 17.
- 2.
State report “On the state and protection of environment of the Russian Federation in 2011”: [E-source].—URL: http://www.mnr.gov.ru/upload/iblock/a76/gosdoklad2011.pdf/.—P. 316.
- 3.
Strategy of socio-economic development of Rostov Oblast until 2020. Set by the Decree of the Legislative Assembly of Rostov Oblast dated October 30, 2007, No. 2067 (edited November 24, 2011, No. 1752): [E-source].—URL: http://base.garant.ru/9904182/
References
Barca F, McCann P, Rodríguez-Pose Р (2012) The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches. J Reg Sci 52(1):134–152
Basurto X, Coleman EA (2010) Institutional and ecological interplay for successful self-governance of community-based fisheries. Ecol Econ 69(5):1094–1103
Bennet EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12(12):1394–1404
Farole T, Rodriguez-Pose A, Storper M (2011) Human geography and the institutions that underlie economic growth. Prog Hum Geogr 35(1):58–80
Gertler M (2010) Rules of the game: the place of institutions in regional economic change. Reg Stud 44(1):1–15
Ostrom E (2007) Sustainable social-ecological systems: an impossibility? doi:10.2139/ssrn.997834
Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939):419–422
Ostrom E (2010) Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. IRISEN, Mysl, Moscow, p 447
Ostrom E (2011) Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud J 39(1):7–27
Ostrom E, Cox M (2010) Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environ Conserv 37(4):451–463
Parent O, Zouache A (2012) Geography versus institutions: new perspectives on the growth of Africa and the Middle East. J Inst Theor Econ 168(3):488–518
Poirier BA, De Loë RC (2010) Analyzing water institutions in the 21st century: guidelines for water researchers and professionals. J Nat Resour Policy Res 2(3):229–244
Polterovich VM (2011) Regional institutes of modernization. Econ Sci Mod Russia 4:17–29
Powell N, Osbeck M (2010) Approaches for understanding and embedding stakeholder realities in Mangrove rehabilitation processes in Southeast Asia: lessons learnt from Mahakam Delta, East Kalimantan. Sustain Dev 18(5):260–270
Rodríguez-Pose A (2013) Do institutions matter for regional development? Reg Stud 47(7):1034–1047
Saha B (2013) Institutions or geography: which matters most for economic development? J Interdiscip Econ 25(1-2):69–89
Sukharev ОS (2012) Institutes of regional development: conceptual and practical analysis of organizational changes. Econ Anal Theory Pract 4:2–12
Tatarkin АI, Kotlyarova SN (2013) Regional institutes of development as factors of economic growth. Econ Reg 3:9–18
Zakharov VM (ed) (2009) Priorities of national ecological policy of Russia. Levko Typography. Institute of Sustainable Development/Center for ecological policy of Russia, Moscow, p 152
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (the Russian Foundation for Humanities) and Administration of Volgograd Oblast (Project No. 17-12-34009 “Institutions and industries of transactional development of regional economy: formation of analytical methodology and policy of regulation”).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frolov, D.P., Popkova, E.G., Strekalova, A.S., Marushchak, I.V. (2017). Strategic Planning of Regional Ecological Development: Adaptation of Elinor Ostrom’s Principles in Russia. In: Popkova, E. (eds) Russia and the European Union. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55257-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55257-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55256-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55257-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)