Enriched Audio Description: Working Towards an Inclusive Museum Experience

Part of the Inclusive Learning and Educational Equity book series (ILEE, volume 3)


Within a museum context, audio description (AD) is generally thought to be a tool for enhancing access for people with a visual impairment, in other words, as a means of providing access, through verbal description, to visual details of an object or artwork. Taking evidence from researchers and practitioners, we argue that AD has a much broader potential scope and benefit. We consider AD in more established fields, such as film, and then explore the issues impacting on AD within museum environments. We also explore the literature on multisensory learning and memory, to create a rationale for the benefits of AD based on multisensory imagery, with or without perceptual experience. We conclude that, through the use of imagery, AD has the potential to guide people around a painting or object in a way which can enhance the ‘seeing’ ability of all people, whether or not they have sight. Further, multisensory experience, based on imagery or perceptual experience, combined with semantic or fact information, would enhance memorability. As such, taking AD from the niche audience of visual impairment, and projecting it into the mass market of the ‘sighted’, could have a revolutionary impact on the museum experience and our understanding of access and difference.


Audiovisual translation Multisensory Universal design Visual impairment Cultural heritage 


  1. Alper, M., Ellcessor, E., Ellis, K., & Goggin. (2015). Reimagining the good life with disability: Communication, new technology, and humane connections. In H. Wang (Ed.), Communication and the “good life” (pp. 197–212). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  2. Braun, S. (2011). Creating coherence in audio description. Meta, 56(3), 645–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer, W. F. (1986). What is autobiographical memory? In D. C. Rubin (Ed.), Autobiographical memory (pp. 25–49). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornoldi, C., Beni, R. D., Roncari, S., & Romano, S. (1989). The effects of imagery instructions on total congenital blind recall. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1(4), 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Coster, K., & Mühleis, V. (2007). Intersensorial translation: Visual art made up by words. In J. Díaz Cintas, A. Remael, & P. Orero (Eds.), Media for all (pp. 189–200). Amsterdam: RODOPI.Google Scholar
  6. Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Accessed 10 Mar 2016.
  7. Eardley, A. F., & Pring, L. (2006). Remembering the past and imagining the future: A role for nonvisual imagery in the everyday cognition of blind and sighted people. Memory, 14(8), 925–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eardley, A. F., & Pring, L. (2014). Sensory imagery in individuals who are blind and sighted: Examining unimodal and multimodal forms. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness., 108(4), 323–334.Google Scholar
  9. Eardley, A., Mineiro, C., Neves, J., & Ride, P. (2016). Redefining access: Embracing multimodality, memorability and shared experience in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 59, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Equality Act. (2010). Accessed 09 Mar 2016.
  11. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2012). Museum experience revisited. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  12. Freire, A., Linhalis, F., Bianchini, S., Fortes, R., & Pimentel, M. G. (2010). Revealing the whiteboard to blind students: An inclusive approach to provide mediation in synchronous e-learning activities. Computers & Education, 54(4), 866–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fryer, L. (2016). An introduction to audio description: A practical guide. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Fryer, L., & Freeman, J. (2012). Presence in those with and without sight: Audio description and its potential for virtual reality applications. Journal of CyberTherapy & Rehabilitation, 5(1), 15–23.Google Scholar
  15. Fryer, L., & Freeman, J. (2013). Cinematic language and the description of film: Keeping AD users in the frame. Perspectives, 21(3), 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fryer, L., & Freeman, J. (2014, March). Can you feel what i’m saying? The impact of verbal information on emotion elicitation and presence in people with a visual impairment. In A. Felnhofer & O. D. Kothgassner (Eds.), Challenging presence: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Presence (pp. 99–107).Google Scholar
  17. Gerber, E. (2007). Seeing isn’t believing: Blindness, race, and cultural literacy. The Senses and Society, 2(1), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jastrow, J. (1899). The mind’s eye. Popular Science Monthly, 54, 299–312.Google Scholar
  19. Jonides, J., Kahn, R., & Rozin, P. (1975). Imagery instructions improve memory in blind subjects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5(5), 424–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koide, N., Kubo, T., Nishida, S., Shibata, T., & Ikeda, K. (2015). Art expertise reduces influence of visual salience on fixation in viewing abstract-paintings. PloS one, 10(2), e0117696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krejtz, I., Szarkowska, A., Krejtz, K., Walczak, A., & Duchowski, A. (2012). Audio description as an aural guide of children’s visual attention. In Proceedings of the symposium on eye tracking research and applications – ETRA ‘12 (pp. 99–106). New York: ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lehmann, S., & Murray, M. (2005). The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 326–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matamala, A., & Remael, A. (2014). Audio-description reloaded: An analysis of visual scenes in 2012 and hero. Translation Studies, 8(1), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maszerowska, A., Matamala, A., Orero, P., & Reviers, N. (2014). Introduction: From source text to target text: The art of audio description. In A. Maszerowska, A. Matamala, & P. Orero, (Eds.), Audio description: New perspectives illustrated (pp. 8–9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V.Google Scholar
  25. Murray, M. M., Molholm, S., Michel, C. M., Heslenfeld, D. J., Ritter, W., Javitt, D. C., Schroeder, C. E., & Foxe, J. J. (2005). Grabbing your ear: Rapid auditory–somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 963–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neves, J. (2012). Multi-sensory approaches to (audio) describing the visual arts. MonTi, 4, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neves, J. (2014). Chapter 3.3.2 descriptive guides: Access to museums, cultural venues and heritage sites. In ADLAB, A. Remael, N. Reviers, & G. Vercauteren (Eds.), Pictures painted in words. ADLAB audio description guidelines. Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste. ebook: Accessed 7 Mar 2016.Google Scholar
  28. Nyberg, L., Habib, R., & Herlitz, A. (2000). Brain activation during episodic memory retrieval: Sex differences. Acta Psychologica, 105(2–3), 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pereira, E. (2009). Feasibility study into the potential contribution of VocalEyes’ services for Museums, Galleries and Heritage sites. Accessed 10 Mar 2016
  30. Ramos, M. (2015). The emotional experience of films: Does audio description make a difference? The Translator, 21(1), 68–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rainer Maria Rilke. (1907). In C. Rilke (ed) (2002). Letters on Cezanne (2nd ed., J. Agee, Trans.). New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  32. RNIB. (2016). Key information and statistics. Accessed 10 June 2016.
  33. Small, J., Darcy, S., & Packer, T. (2012). The embodied tourist experiences of people with vision impairment: Management implications beyond the visual gaze. Tourism Management, 33(4), 941–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Snyder, J. (2014). The visual made verbal: A comprehensive training manual and guide to the history and applications of audio description. Arlington: American Council of the Blind, Inc..Google Scholar
  35. Sonic Paintings. (2016) . Accessed 09 Mar 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WestminsterLondonUK
  2. 2.Centre for Translation Studies (CenTraS)University College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.VocalEyesLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of English, Linguistics and Cultural StudiesUniversity of WestminsterLondonUK
  5. 5.College of Humanities and Social SciencesHamad bin Khalifa UniversityAr-RayyanQatar

Personalised recommendations