• Julian Richards


The opening chapter begins with the premise that identity has become an “inescapable component” of security in the twenty-first century. Much of this is to do with global processes such as globalization and the effects they have on multicultural societies. In a supposedly multicultural country such as Britain, much debate has been had recently at the policy level about notions of “Britishness” and its connection to a secure society in which certain values are defined and followed. This chapter introduces the debates, and the theoretical frameworks under which analysis will be conducted, including identity theory, political myth, and discourse analysis.


  1. Aldrich RJ (2009) Beyond the Vigilant State: Globalization and Intelligence. Review of International Studies 33: 889–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alghamdi A (2011) Transformations of the Liminal Self: Configurations of Home and Identity for Muslim Characters in British Postcolonial Fiction. Bloomington, IN, iUniverse.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson B (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London, Verso.Google Scholar
  4. BBC (2004) Blair Terror Speech in Full. Accessed 12 March 2010
  5. BBC (2005) London Bomber: Text in Full. Accessed 1 July 2016
  6. BBC (2013) EDL Leader Tommy Robinson Quits Group. Accessed 25 June 2016.
  7. BBC (2016) PM Condemns ‘Despicable’ Post-EU Referendum Hate Crimes. Accessed 2 July 2016.
  8. Beck U (2002) The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited. Theory, Culture and Society 19(4): 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beckett A (2004) The Making of the Terror Myth. The Guardian. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  10. Beckford M (2012) Bee Stings Killed as Many in UK as Terrorists, Says Watchdog. The Telegraph. Accessed 2 July 2016.
  11. Brown G (2006) Speech to the Fabian Society, London, December 2006. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  12. Burman J (2015) Terror Alert: 3,000 Islamist Extremists in Britain Ready to Attack the UK in Weeks. The Express. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  13. Croft S (2012) Securitizing Islam: Identity and the Search for Security. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curtis A (2004) The Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear. Accessed 10 June 2016.
  15. Daily Mail (2007) The £18,000 Bomb-Proof Litter Bins with TV Screens as Standard. Accessed 2 July 2016.
  16. Durodié B (2007) Fear and Terror in a Post-Political Age. Government and Opposition 42(3): 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elgot J (2014) Cancel Passports of British Jihadis Who Join Islamic State, Says Cameron. Huffington Post. Accessed 25 June 2016.
  18. Feldman M and Littler M (2014) Tell MAMA Reporting 2013/14: Anti-Muslim Overview, Analysis and ‘Cumulative Extremism’. Centre for Fascist, Anti-Fascist and Post-Fascist Studies, University of Teeside.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault M (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Gamson WA, Croteau D, Hoynes W and Sasson T (1992) Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality. An Review Soc 18: 373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gardner F (2007) MI5 Watch 2,000 Terror Suspects. BBC. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  22. Glees A (2009) UK Security Policy and the ‘Politics of Fear’. In Major P and Moran CR (eds) Spooked; Britain, Empire and Intelligence since 1945. Newcastle, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Hoffman B (2006) Inside Terrorism. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. JIC (2005) International Terrorism: Impact of Iraq. Available via Iraq Inquiry site. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  25. Kahneman D (2012) Thinking Fast and Slow. London, Penguin.Google Scholar
  26. Kerr I and Earle J (2013) Prediction, Preemption, Presumption: How Big Data Threatens Big Picture Privacy. Stanford Law Review Online 66: 65–72Google Scholar
  27. Kelsey D (2014) The Myth of the City Trickster: Storytelling, Bankers and Ideology in the Mail Online. Journal of Political Ideologies 19(3): 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kundnani A (2009) Spooked: How Not to Prevent Violent Extremism. London, Institute of Race Relations.Google Scholar
  29. Kundnani A (2015) The Muslims are Coming! London, Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Laqueur W (1999) The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Malik S (2007) My Brother the Bomber. Prospect Magazine. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  32. Mughal F (2014) Tit for Tat’ Extremism and the Rise of far Right anti-Muslim Movements in the UK. Open Democracy. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  33. Norton-Taylor R (2010) Iraq inquiry. Eliza Manningham-Buller’s Devastating Testimony. The Guardian. Accessed 10 June 2015.
  34. (2011) PM’s Speech at Munich Security Conference. Accessed 16 September 2011.
  35. Pantazis C and Pemberton S (2009) From the ‘Old’ to the ‘New’ Suspect Community: Examining the Impacts of Recent UK Counter-Terrorist Legislation. British Journal of Criminology 49: 646–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pidd H (2016) Manchester Tram ‘Racism’: Two Bailed, One Remains in Custody. The Guardian. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  37. Rapoport DC (2002) The Four Waves of Rebel Terror and September 11. Anthropoetics 8(1): Accessed 10 May 2016.
  38. Reilly K (2016) Read President Obama’s Remarks On ‘Brexit’ and Globalization. Time. Accessed 2 July 2016.
  39. Richards J (2007) Contemporary Terrorist Threats in the UK: The Pakistan dimension. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism 2(1): 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Richards J (2012) A Guide to National Security: Threats, Responses and Strategies. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Richards J (2013) Reactive Community Mobilization in Europe: The case of the English Defence League. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 5(3): 177–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards A (2015) From Terrorism to ‘Radicalization’ to ‘Extremism’: Counterterrorism Imperative or Loss of Focus? International Affairs 91(2): 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sageman M (2008) Leaderless Jihad. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shaver A (2015) You’re More Likely to be Fatally Crushed by Furniture than Killed by a Terrorist. The Washington Post. Accessed 2 July 2016.
  45. Stryker S (2008) From Mead to a Structural Symbolic Interactionism and Beyond. Annual Review of Sociology 34: 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julian Richards
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BuckinghamBuckinghamUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations