Abstract
Even though there is a growing body of research on the effectiveness of form-focused instruction (FFI), defined as both the introduction of target language (TL) features, be they grammatical, lexical, phonological or pragmatic in nature, the practice of these forms or the provision of corrective feedback on errors in their use (cf. Nassaji & Fotos, 2011; Spada, 2011; Loewen, 2012; Pawlak, 2014), studies of this kind have in the main focused on determining the effects of different instructional techniques, paying only scant attention to the impact of mediating variables. One key set of such variables are individual differences (IDs) among learners, both cognitive (e.g., aptitude), affective (e.g., motivation) and social (e.g., beliefs), the impact of which can hardly be underestimated as in some situations individual learner profiles may in fact determine the success or failure of the techniques and procedures employed by teachers. Given the fact that research exploring the effects of such factors is still in its infancy, it is important to take stock of what has been achieved in this domain and consider future directions of empirical investigations of this kind. This is precisely the aim of the paper which provides an overview of the available research on the interfaces between IDs and FFI, particularly with respect to grammar, offers a critical look at their scope and methodology, and seeks to identify the challenges that research on FFI has to face in this respect.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12, 183–210.
Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Biedroń, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016). The interface between research into individual learner variables and teaching practice; The case of cognitive factors and personality. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 395–422.
Broszkiewicz, A. (2011). The effect of focused communication tasks on instructed acquisition of English past counterfactual conditionals. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 335–363.
Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–27). London: Longman.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical basis of communicative approaches to second language testing and teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.
Dabaghi, A. (2008). A comparison of the effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on learners’ performance in tailor-made tests. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 1–13.
DeKeyser, R. M. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77, 501–514.
DeKeyser, R. M. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55 (Supplement 1), 1–25.
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill Acquisition Theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A. (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York/London: Routledge.
Egi, T. (2010). Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: Learner responses as language awareness. Modern Language Journal, 94, 1–21.
Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 39–60.
Ellis, R. (2005b). Instructed language learning and task-based teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 713–728). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ellis, R. (2006a). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 83–107.
Ellis, R. (2006b). Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 431–463.
Ellis, R. (2008a). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008b). Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18, 4–22.
Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. M. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R. (2010). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 33–349.
Erlam, R. (2003). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 87, 242–260.
Gardner, R. C. (2001). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 1–20). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Gass, S. M. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Oxford: Blackwell.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Lantolf, J. P. (2014). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57–72). London/New York: Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Thomson & Heinle.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2010). Teaching and testing grammar. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 519–542). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 48, 263–280.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.
Li, S. (2014). The interface between feedback type, L2 proficiency, and the nature of linguistic target. Language Teaching Research, 18, 373–396.
Loewen, S. (2011). Focus on form. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 122–139). New York/London: Routledge.
Loewen, S. (2014). The role of feedback. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 24–40). London/New York: Routledge.
Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York/London: Routledge.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300.
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.
Mackey, S. L. (2011). English as an international lingua franca pedagogy. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 576–592). New York/London: Routledge.
Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P. (2010). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60, 501–533.
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2012). Production-oriented and comprehension-based grammar teaching in the foreign language classroom. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Nassaji, H. (2015). Interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. London/New York: Routledge.
Nielson, K. B. (2014). Can planning time compensate for individual differences in working memory capacity? Language Teaching Research, 18, 272–293.
Niżegorodcew, A. (2007). Input for instructed L2 learners: The relevance of relevance. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Noels, K., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations of self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50, 57–85.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 87, 519–533.
Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573–595.
Pawlak, M. (2004). Describing and researching interactive processes in the foreign language classroom. Konin: State University of Applied Sciences in Konin Press.
Pawlak, M. (2006). The place of form-focused instruction in the foreign language classroom. Poznań/Kalisz: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
Pawlak, M. (2007). Comparing the effect of focus on form and focus on forms in teaching English third conditional. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Exploring focus on form in language teaching. Special issue of Studies in Pedagogy and Fine Arts (pp. 169–192). Kalisz/Poznań: Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts in Kalisz of Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
Pawlak, M. (2009a). Factors determining success and failure in the learning of English grammar. In A. Barker, D. Callahan, & A. Ferreira (Eds.), Success and failure. Essays from the 29th APEAA conference at the University of Aveiro, 17–19th April 2008 (pp. 327–338). Aveiro: University of Aveiro.
Pawlak, M. (2009b). Grammar learning strategies and language attainment: Seeking a relationship. Research in Language, 7, 43–60.
Pawlak, M. (2011). Cultural differences in perceptions of form/focused instruction: The case of advanced Polish and Italian learners. In A. Wojtaszek & J. Arabski (Eds.), Aspects of culture in second language acquisition and foreign language learning (pp. 77–94). Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Pawlak, M. (2012a). Individual differences in language learning and teaching: Achievements, prospects and challenges. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. xix–xlvi). Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Pawlak, M. (2012b). Variability in the use of implicit knowledge: The effect of task, level and linguistic form. In E. Piechurska-Kuciel & L. Piasecka (Eds.), Variability and stability in foreign and second language learning contexts (pp. 279–298). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Pawlak, M. (2012c). The effects of focus on forms and focus on form in teaching complex grammatical structures. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38, 35–56.
Pawlak, M. (2013a). Principles of instructed language learning revisited: Guidelines for effective grammar teaching in the foreign language classroom. In K. Droździał-Szelest & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching. Studies in honor of Waldemar Marton (pp. 199–220). Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Pawlak, M. (2013b). Comparing learners’ and teachers’ beliefs about form-focused instruction. In D. Gabryś-Barker, E. Piechurska-Kuciel, & J. Zybert (Eds.), Investigations in teaching and learning languages: Studies in honor of Hanna Komorowska (pp. 109–131). Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Pawlak, M. (2014). Error correction in the foreign language classroom: Reconsidering the issues. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Pawlak, M. (2015). Willingness to communicate as a factor influencing the effectiveness of input-providing and output-prompting oral corrective feedback. Paper read at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Toronto, March 21–24, 2015.
Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (in press). Teaching stylistic inversion to advanced learners of English: Interaction of input manipulation and individual difference variables. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching.
Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Bielak, J. (2015). Exploring advanced learners’ beliefs about pronunciation instruction and their relationship with attainment. In E. Waniek-Klimczak & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Teaching and researching the pronunciation of English: Studies in honor of Włodzimierz Sobkowiak (pp. 3–22). Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1986). An acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 92–122.
Pienemann, M. (2007). Processability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 137–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rassaei, E. (2015). Recasts, field dependence-independence cognitive style, and L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 19, 499–518.
Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data affecting and effecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–164.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17–46.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between the characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 11, 361–392.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835–874.
Shintani, N. (2015). The incidental grammar acquisition in focus on form and focus on forms instruction for Young Beginner Learners. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 115–140.
Shintani, N., Li, S., & Ellis, R. (2013). Comprehension-based versus production-based grammar instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Language Learning, 63, 296–329.
Spada, N. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44, 225–236.
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
Stefanou, C., & Révész, A. (2015). Direct written corrective feedback, learner differences, and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural reference. Modern Language Journal, 99, 263–282.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 303–334.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics. Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tarone, E., & Bigelow, M. (2005). Impact of literacy on oral language processing: Implications for SLA research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 77–97.
Tavakoli, M., & Zarrinabadi, N. (2016). Differential effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10, 1–13.
Tomita, Y., & Spada, N. (2013). Form-focused instruction and learner investment in L2 communication. Modern Language Journal, 97, 591–610.
Trendak, O. (2015). Exploring the role of strategic intervention in form-focused instruction. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Truscott, J. (1999). What’s wrong with oral grammar correction? Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437–456.
Yoshida, R. (2010). How do teachers and learners perceive corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom? Modern Language Journal, 94, 293–314.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pawlak, M. (2017). Individual Difference Variables as Mediating Influences on Success or Failure in Form-Focused Instruction. In: Piechurska-Kuciel, E., Szymańska-Czaplak, E., Szyszka, M. (eds) At the Crossroads: Challenges of Foreign Language Learning. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55155-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55155-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55154-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55155-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)