Promoting Gender Equity and Equality Through the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines: Experiences from Multiple Case Studies

Part of the MARE Publication Series book series (MARE, volume 14)


Gender equity and equality is the fourth guiding principle of the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries (SSF Guidelines), and sits within its wider human rights framework. The SSF Guidelines contain acknowledgement of the roles of women in the small-scale fisheries value chain, the need for gender equity and equality in access to human well-being resources, and the need for equal gender participation in fisheries governance. While the inclusion of gender in the SSF Guidelines is unprecedented and encouraging, effective implementation is the critical next step. Part of the implementation process will include the creation of culturally and regionally-specific information that allows local agencies to recognize and prioritize gender needs. To provide an example of the diverse and interacting issues related to the implementation of the gender equity and equality principle, we use case studies and expertise from seven countries and regions. We examine the context-specific issues that should be considered in the implementation process and focus on the many barriers to gender equity and equality in small-scale fisheries. We conclude by outlining the many gender approaches that could be used to implement the SSF Guidelines, and suggest a gender transformative approach. Such an approach focuses on illuminating root causes of gender injustice and inequality, and requires on-going examination of power relationships as well as capacity development for women and marginalized groups.


Implementation Gender equity Equality Small-scale fisheries Value chain Barriers Opportunities 


  1. Adeokun, O. A., & Adereti, F. O. (2003). Agricultural extension and fisheries development: Training for women in fish industry in Lagos – State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Social Research, 3, 64–76.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29, 1623–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal, B. (2009). Rule making in community forestry institutions: The difference women make. Ecological Economics, 68, 2296–2308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison, E. H., & Ellis, F. (2001). The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy, 25, 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badjeck, M. C., Allison, E. H., Halls, A. S., & Dulvy, N. K. (2010). Impacts of climate variability and change on fishery-based livelihoods. Marine Policy, 34, 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Béné, C., & Merten, S. (2008). Women and fish-for-sex: Transactional sex, HIV/AIDS and gender in African fisheries. World Development, 36, 875–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Béné, C., Arthur, R., Norbury, H., Allison, E. H., Beveridge, M., Bush, S., Campling, L., Leschen, W., Little, D., Squires, D., Thisted, S. H., Troell, M., & Williams, M. (2016). Contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to food security and poverty reduction: Assessing the current evidence. World Development, 79, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchy, M., & Rai, B. (2008). Do women-only approaches to natural resource management help women? The case of community forestry in Nepal. In B. P. Resurreccion & R. Elmhirst (Eds.), Gender and natural resource management (pp. 127–150). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  9. CEDAW. (2016). General recommendation No. 34 on the rights of rural women. New York: CEDAW (Committee on the Elimination of Descrimination Against Women), CEDAW/C/GC/34.Google Scholar
  10. CFS, & FAO. (2012). Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests in the context of national food security. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  11. Cho, S. Y. (2014). International women’s convention, democracy, and gender equality. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 719–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole, S. M., van Koppen, B., Puskur, R., Estrada, N., DeClerck, F., Baidu-Forson, J. J., Remans, R., Mapedza, E., Longley, C., Muyaule, C., & Zulu, F. (2014a). Collaborative effort to operationalize the gender transformative approach in the Barotse Floodplain, Program brief: AAS-2014038. Penang: CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, S. M., Kantor, P., Sarapura, S., & Rajaratnam, S. (2014b). Gender-transformative approaches to address inequalities in food, nutrition and economic outcomes in aquatic agricultural systems, Working paper: AAS-2014-42. Penang: CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems.Google Scholar
  14. Cole, S. M., Puskur, R., Rajaratnam, S., & Zulu, F. (2015). Exploring the intricate relationship between povery, gender inequality and rural masculinity: A case study from an aquatic agricultural system in Zambia. Culture, Society & Masculinities, 7, 154–170.Google Scholar
  15. Cornwall, A. (2014). Women’s empowerment: What works and why? WIDER working paper 2014/104. Helsinki: UNU: WIDER.Google Scholar
  16. Cornwall, A., & Rivas, A. M. (2015). From “gender equality and ‘women’s empowerment” to global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly, 36, 396–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cornwall, A., Harrison, E., & Whitehead, A. (2007). Gender myths and feminist fables: The struggle for interpretive power in gender and development. Development and Change, 38, 1–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. D’Souza, A., & Tandon, S. (2015). Using household and intrahousehold data to assess food insecurity: Evidence from Bangladesh, Economic research report: 190. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  19. Djoudi, H., & Brockhaus, M. (2011). Is adaptation to climate change gender neutral? Lessons from communities dependent on livestock and forests in northern Mali. International Forestry Review, 13, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO. (2015). Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries in the context of food security and poverty eradication. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  21. Frangoudes, K. (2013). Women in fisheries: A European perspective. European Union: Directorate-general for internal policies. Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies: BA-01-13-425-EN-C.Google Scholar
  22. Frangoudes, K. (2015). Fisheries policy, Policy-specific module: EIGE/2014/OPER/10. Vilnius: European Institute for Gender Equality.Google Scholar
  23. Frangoudes, K., & Keromnes, E. (2008). Women in artisanal fisheries in Brittany, France. Development, 51, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frangoudes, K., Marugán-Pintos, B., & Pascual-Fernández, J. J. (2008). From open access to co-governance and conservation: The case of women shellfish collectors in Galicia (Spain). Marine Policy, 32, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gerrard, S. (2015). Mobility practices and gender contracts in a fishery-related area. In S. M. Channa & M. Porter (Eds.), Gender, livelihood and environment: How women manage resources (pp. 113–140). Dehli: Orient Black Swan.Google Scholar
  26. Gopal, N., Porter, M., Kusakabe, K., & Choo, P.-S. (2015). Guest editorial: Gender in aquaculture and fisheries – Navigating change. Women in Fisheries Information Bulletin, 26, 3–11.Google Scholar
  27. Harrison, E. (1997). Fish, feminists and the FAO: Translating “gender” through differing institution in the development process. In A. M. Goetz (Ed.), Getting institutions right for women in development (pp. 61–76). London/New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  28. Hill, C. L. M. (2003). Gender-disaggregated data for agriculture and rural development: Guide for facilitators. Rome: FAO Socio-economics and Gender Analysis (SEAGA) Programme.Google Scholar
  29. Jentoft, S. (2013). Governing tenure in Norwegian and Sami small-scale fisheries: From common pool to common property? Land Tenure Journal, 91–115.Google Scholar
  30. Kabeer, N. (1998). “Can buy me love”? Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh, IDS. Discussion paper: 363. Sussex: IDS.Google Scholar
  31. Kabeer, N. (2000). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30, 435–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kantor, P., Morgan, M., & Choudhury, A. (2015). Amplifying outcomes by addressing inequality: The role of gender-transformative approaches in agricultural research for development. Gender, Technology and Development, 19, 292–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kleiber, D. (2014). Gender and small-scale fisheries in the Central Philippines. Doctoral dissertation, The University of British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  34. Kleiber, D., Harris, L. M., & Vincent, A. C. J. (2014). Improving fisheries estimates by including women’s catch in the Central Philippines. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 71, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kleiber, D., Harris, L. M., & Vincent, A. C. J. (2015). Gender and small-scale fisheries: A case for counting women and beyond. Fish and Fisheries, 16, 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matsue, N., Daw, T., & Garrett, L. (2014). Women fish traders on the Kenyan coast: Livelihoods, bargaining power, and participation in management. Coastal Management, 42, 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mukhopadhyay, M. (2007). Mainstreaming gender or “streaming” gender away: Feminists marooned in the development business. In A. Cornwall, E. Harrison, & A. Whitehead (Eds.), Feminisms in development: Contradictions, contestations and challenges (pp. 135–149). London/New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  38. Neis, B., Gerrard, S., & Power, N. G. (2013). Women and children first: The gendered and generational social-ecology of smaller-scale fisheries in Newfoundland and Labrador and Northern Norway. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Onyango, P. O., & Jentoft, S. (2011). Climbing the hill: Poverty alleviation, gender relationships, and women’s social entrepreneurship in Lake Victoria, Tanzania. Maritime Studies, 10, 117–140.Google Scholar
  40. Pearson, R., & Jackson, C. (1998). Introduction: Interrogating development: Feminism, gender and policy. In C. Jackson & R. Pearson (Eds.), Feminist visions of development: Gender analysis and policy (pp. 1–16). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Petrics, H., Blum, M., Kaaria, S., Tamma, P., & Barale, K. (2015). Enhancing the potential of family farming for poverty reduction and food security: Through gender-sensistive rural advisory services, Occasional papers on innovation in family farming. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  42. Porter, M., & Mbezi, R. G. (2010). From hand to mouth: Fishery projects, women, men and household poverty. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 31, 381–400.Google Scholar
  43. Power, N. G. (2008). Occupational risks, safety and masculinity: Newfoundland fish harvesters’ experiences and understandings of fishery risks. Health Risk & Society, 10, 565–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rajagopalan, R. (2007). Uncertain future. Yemaya, 24, 3–5.Google Scholar
  45. Ram-Bidesi, V. (2015). Recognizing the role of women in supporting marine stewardship in the Pacific Islands. Marine Policy, 59, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Razavi, S., & Miller, C. (1995). From WID to GAD: Conceptual shifts in the women and development discourse. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  47. Reeves, H., & Baden, S. (2000). Gender and development: Concepts and definitions, Report: 55. Brighton: University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  48. Resurreccion, B. P. (2008). Gender, legitimacy and patronage-driven participation: Fisheries management in the Tonle Sap Great Lake, Cambodia. In B. P. Resurreccion & R. Elmhirst (Eds.), Gender and natural resource management (pp. 151–174). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  49. Saha, A., Nag, A., & Nag, P. K. (2006). Occupational injury proneness in Indian women: A survey in fish processing industries. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 1, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Santos, A. N. (2015). Fisheries as a way of life: Gendered livelihoods, identities and perspectives of artisanal fisheries in eastern Brazil. Marine Policy, 62, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seniloli, M., Taylor, L., & Fulivai, S. (2002). Gender issues in environmental sustainability and poverty reduction in the community: Social and community issues. Development Bulletin, 58, 96–98.Google Scholar
  52. Sharma, C. (2013). Beyond lip service. Yemaya, 42, 9–11.Google Scholar
  53. Singh, S., Darroch, J. E., Vlassoff, M., & Nadeau, J. (2003). Adding it up: The benefits of investing in sexual and reproductive health care. New York: UNFPA.Google Scholar
  54. Subrahmanian, R. (2007). Making sense of gender in shifting institutional contexts: Some reflections on gender mainstreaming. In A. Cornwall, E. Harrison, & A. Whitehead (Eds.), Feminisms in development: Contradictions, contestations and challenges (pp. 112–121). London/New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  55. Tekanene, M. (2006). The women fish traders of Tarawa, Kiribati. In P.-S. Choo, S. J. Hall, & M. J. Williams (Eds.), Global symposium on gender and fisheries. Seventh Asian fisheries forum, 1–2 December 2004, Penang, Malaysia (pp. 115–120). Penang: WorldFish Center.Google Scholar
  56. The WorldFish Center. (2010). Gender and fisheries: Do women support, complement, or subsidize small scale fishing activities, Issue brief: 2108. Penang: The WorldFish Center.Google Scholar
  57. Turgo, N. N. (2014). Redefining and experiencing masculinity in a Philippine fishing community. Philippine Sociological Review, 62, 7–38.Google Scholar
  58. UN Women. (2016). UN Women Training Centre glossary. Accessed 2 May 2016.
  59. Walker, B. L. E. (2001). Sisterhood and seine-nets: Engendering development and conservation in Ghana’s marine fishery. The Professional Geographer, 53, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walker, B. L. E., & Robinson, M. A. (2009). Economic development, marine protected areas and gendered access to fishing resources in a Polynesian lagoon. Gender, Place & Culture, 16, 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Westerman, K., Oleson, K. L. L., & Harris, A. R. (2013). Building socio-ecological resilience to climate change through community-based coastal conservation and development : Experiences in southern Madagascar. Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science, 11(1), 87–97.Google Scholar
  62. Williams, M. J. (2008). Why look at fisheries through a gender lens? Development, 51, 180–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams, M. J. (2015). Women in today’s fisheries economy. Yemaya, 50, 2–4.Google Scholar
  64. World Bank, FAO, International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2009). Gender in fisheries and aquaculture. In The World Bank, Food and Agriculture Orhganization, and International Fund for Agricultural Development (Ed.), Gender in agriculture sourcebook (pp. 561–600). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  65. Zhang, L., Liu, C., Liu, H., & Yu, L. (2008). Women’s land rights in rural China: Current situation and likely trends. In B. P. Resurreccion & R. Elmhirst (Eds.), Gender and natural resource management (pp. 87–108). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pacific Island Fisheries Science CentreJoint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric ResearchHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Sociology DepartmentMemorial University NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada
  3. 3.Université de Bretagne OccidentaleBrestFrance
  4. 4.Dartmouth School of Graduate & Advanced StudiesHanoverUSA
  5. 5.WorldFishDhakaBangladesh
  6. 6.WorldFishLusakaZambia
  7. 7.National Fisheries UniversityShimonosekiJapan
  8. 8.University of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  9. 9.National Marine Fisheries ServiceAlaska Fisheries Science CenterSeattleUSA
  10. 10.WorldFishBatu MaungMalaysia

Personalised recommendations