Indian TV Anchors on Twitter: Technological Practice and Textual Form

  • Vibodh ParthasarathiEmail author
  • Ananda Mitra


How do established TV journalists engage with the possibilities offered by a new technology of newsmaking? Pondering this issue amidst the media boom in India, this chapter examines the journalistic practice of leading TV news anchors on Twitter. Two specific aspects of their practice on Twitter are examined here: variations in their messaging behaviour, and shifts in their opinions towards political actors. We draw on a corpus of over 2000 tweets generated by three leading TV news anchors—the most followed Indian journalists on Twitter that year—over a period of 13 months leading to the national elections of May 2014. National elections, the biggest news spectacle in India offer an exciting moment to examine journalistic practices, especially changes in journalists’ opinions towards key political and electoral actors. The corpus of tweets is investigated into at two levels. At the enumerative level, we profile the volume and frequency of tweets, the people and issues drawn attention to, and the kinds of media content circulated by these leading journalists. Such a comparative mapping reveals the messaging behaviour of TV journalists on the mobile “broadcasting” platform of Twitter. At the interpretive level, we decipher the opinion of these journalists towards key political actors as reflected in their tweets, including shifts in their opinion in tandem with changes in electoral dynamics. This dual traction ensures our study is as much about how established actors from the legacy media engage with a novel platform of news circulation, as about how journalists respond to changing political currents.



The authors thank Sanjay Mamani and Biswajit Das for their support and ideas, Shruti Ravi and Susan Koshy for helping out in aspects of the research, and Vipul Mudgal for comments on the draft.


  1. Ahmad, A. N. (2010). Is Twitter a useful tool for journalists? Journal of Media Practice, 11(2), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S., & Jaidka, K. (2013). Protests against #Delhigangrape on Twitter: Analyzing India’s Arab spring. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 1(5), 28–58.Google Scholar
  3. Aneez, Z., Chattapadhyay, S., Parthasarathi, V., & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Indian Newspapers’ Digital Transition: Dainik Jagran, Hindustan Times, and Malayala Manorama. Oxford. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (Dec).Google Scholar
  4. Artwick, C. (2013). Reporters on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 212–228.Google Scholar
  5. Belair-Gagnon, V., Mishra, S., & Agur, C. (2013). Reconstructing the Indian public sphere: Newswork and social media in the Delhi gang rape case. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 15(8), 1059–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2012). Social media as beat: Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice, 6(3), 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruns, A. (2008). Life beyond the public sphere: Towards a networked model for political deliberation. Information Polity, 13(1–2), 65–79.Google Scholar
  8. Burns, A. (2010). Oblique strategies for ambient journalism. Media-Culture Journal, 13(2). Accessed 19 Dec 2010.
  9. Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2015). Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In N. Rambukkana (Ed.), Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks (pp. 13–28). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  10. Chadha, K. (2012). Twitter as media watch-dog? Lessons from India’s Radia tapes scandal. Global Media and Communication, 8(2), 171–176.Google Scholar
  11. Chattopadhyay, S. (2015). Mobile news culture: News apps, journalistic practices and the 2014 Indian general election. In E. Thorsen & C. Sreedharan (Eds.), India election 2014: First reflections (pp. 143–157). Poole: The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University.Google Scholar
  12. Chung, D. S. (2007). Profits and perils: Online news producers’ perceptions of interactivity and uses of interactive features. Convergence, 13, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deuze, M., & Marjoribanks, T. (2009). Newswork. Journalism: Theory Practice & Criticism, 10(5): 555–561.Google Scholar
  14. Farhi, P. (2009). The Twitter explosion. American Journalism Review, 31(3), 26–31.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, W. R. (1985). The narrative paradigm: An elaboration. Communication Monographs, 52, 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. GoI. (2014). Expert committee on Prasar Bharati (Vol. 2). New Delhi, Government of India.Google Scholar
  17. Hermida, A. (2010a). From TV to Twitter: How ambient news became ambient journalism. Media-Culture Journal, 13(2). Accessed 14 June 2010.
  18. Hermida, A. (2010b). Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IBM. (n.d.). SPSS text analytics for surveys. Accessed 30 Oct 2016.
  20. Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2010). Blur: How to know what’s true in the age of information overload. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  21. Larsson, A. O. (2013). Tweeting the viewer: Use of Twitter in a talk show context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(2), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lasorsa, D. L. (2012). Transparency and other journalistic norms on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13(3), 402–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C., & Holton, A. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacNamara, J. (2008). Internet media and the public sphere: The 2007 Australian e-electioneering experience. Media International Australia, 129, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCarthy, A. (2001). Ambient television: Visual culture and public space. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Messner, M., Linke, M., & Eford, A. (2011). Shoveling tweets: An analysis of the microblogging engagement of traditional news organizations. Paper accepted for presentation at the International Symposium on Online Journalism in Austin, TX (1 Apr).Google Scholar
  27. Mitra, A. (2010). Creating a presence on social networks via narbs. Global Media Journal, 9(16), 1–18.Google Scholar
  28. Mitra, A. (2014). Narbs: A narrative approach to the use of big data. In E. Cohen (Ed.), Communication yearbook 38 (pp. 369–386). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Mitra, A., & Mamani, S. (2014). Using narbs to create narrative maps from unstructured big data: A case study. International Journal Logistics Economics and Globalisation, 6(1), 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mudgal, V. (2015). Framing the 2014 elections: The curious absence of development. Television & New Media, 16(4), 354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Musani, R. (2013). Top ten Indian journalists to follow on Twitter, 10 July.
  32. Newman, N. (2010). #UKelection 2010, mainstream media and the role of the Internet: How social and digital media affected the business of politics and journalis (Working Paper Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  33. Newslaundry. (2014). Political character in 140 characters. Accessed 12 July 2015.
  34. Ohm, B. (2007). The televised community: Culture, politics, and the market of visual representation in India. Ph.D. thesis,
  35. Park, C. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1641–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parmelee, J. H. (2013). Political journalists and Twitter: Influences on norms and practices. Journal of Media Practice, 14(4), 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parthasarathi, V., et al. (2012). Mapping digital media: India. London: Open Society Foundations.Google Scholar
  38. Pavlik, J. (1996). New media technology: Cultural and commercial perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  39. Punj, S. (2013, November 7). Can digital media make a difference in general elections 2014? Accessed 7 Apr 2016.
  40. Rao, U. (2010). News as culture: Journalistic practices and the remaking of Indian leadership traditions. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  41. Small, T. (2011). What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 872–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stahlberg, P. (2002). Lucknow daily: How a Hindi newspaper constructs society. Stockholm: Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology.Google Scholar
  43. Vij, S. (2014). Why CNN-IBN’s Sagarika Ghose may no longer criticise Modi,—News. Politics. Culture 21 May.’s-Sagarika-Ghose-may-no-longer-criticise-Modi. Accessed 2 July 2015.
  44. Wallsten, K. (2014). Microblogging and the news: Political elites and the ultimate retweet. In J. Bishop (Ed.), Politics and policy in the information age. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  45. Yoo, J., & Jo, S. (2014). How do journalists express their perceptions of public relations on Twitter? Social Behavior & Personality, 42(7), 1175–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jamia Milla IslamiaNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Wake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations