Skip to main content

Theoretical Analysis of the Metrics for Measuring the Sustainability of Infrastructure Projects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Carbon Footprint and the Industrial Life Cycle

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

The built environment contributes significantly to the emission of greenhouse gases. Empirical evidence suggests that these gases are principally responsible for climate change. To mitigate the impact of climate change on the environment, there is an increasing need to ensure that infrastructure projects are sustainable. Hence, this chapter presents a systematic review of extant literature on metrics for evaluating the sustainability of infrastructure projects, as there are currently limited studies that have holistically addressed the lack of theoretical information on the metrics for evaluating the sustainability of infrastructure. Indicative results from the extant review of literature revealed that the number of publications on sustainability metrics has been increasing and there are a growing number of systems and sustainable development indicators for measuring the sustainability of infrastructure projects. These findings suggest that issues relating to sustainability are becoming more important to built-environment researchers and practitioners. The results of the study provide valuable insights on the trends and gaps in theoretical knowledge on metrics for measuring the sustainability of infrastructure projects in the global South. The identified metrics in this chapter could be used in the development of an infrastructure decision support tool that can be used by for project teams to facilitate optimization of processes associated with sustainable infrastructure projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdel-Wahab, M., & Vogl, B. (2011). Trends of productivity growth in the construction industry across Europe, US and Japan. Construction Management and Economics, 29(6), 635–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adetunji, I., Price, A., Fleming, P., & Kemp, P. (2003). The application of systems thinking to the concept of sustainability. In D. J. Greenwood, (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual ARCOM Conference. University of Brighton: Association of Researchers in Construction Management (Vol. 1, pp. 161–170).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkisson, A., & Hatcher, R. L. (2001). The compass index of sustainability: Prototype for a comprehensive sustainability information system. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3(4), 509–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baloi, D. (2003) Sustainable construction: Challenges and opportunities. In D. J. Greenwood (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual ARCOM Conference. University of Brighton: Association of Researchers in Construction Management (Vol. 1, pp. 289–297).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeau, L. (1999). Sustainable development and the future of construction: A comparison of visions from various countries. Building Research and Information, 27(6), 354–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau, K. W. (1997). The ranking of construction management journals. Construction Management and Economics, 15(4), 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, F. C. (2012). Construction and economic development: The case of Malaysia. International Journal of Construction Management, 12(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, Y. H., Tao, L., & Wong, F. K. (2015). Causal relationship between construction activities, employment and GDP: The case of Hong Kong. Habitat International, 46, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang, T. H. G., & Low, S. P. (2011). Role of construction in economic development: Review of key concepts in the past 40 years. Habitat International, 35(1), 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feige, A., Mcallister, P., & Wallbaum, H. (2013b). Rental price and sustainability ratings: Which sustainability criteria are really paying back? Construction Management and Economics, 31(4), 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feige, A., Wallbaum, H., Janser, M., & Windlinger, L. (2013a). Impact of sustainable office buildings on occupants’ comfort and productivity. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15(1), 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuerst, F., & McAllister, P. (2011). Green noise or green value? Measuring the effects of environmental certification on office values. Real Estate Economics, 39(1), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuerst, F., McAllister, P., Nanda, A., & Wyatt, P. (2016). Energy performance ratings and house prices in Wales: An empirical study. Energy Policy, 92, 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronlund, C. J., Zanobetti, A., Wellenius, G. A., Schwartz, J. D., & O’Neill, M. S. (2016). Vulnerability to renal, heat and respiratory hospitalizations during extreme heat among US elderly. Climatic Change, 136(3), 631–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaillon, L., & Poon, C. S. (2008). Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: A Hong Kong case study. Construction Management and Economics, 26(9), 953–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, O. M., Hansen, A. R., & Kragh, J. (2016). Market response to the public display of energy performance rating at property sales. Energy Policy, 93, 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, M., & Hewage, K. (2016). Life cycle performance of modular buildings: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1171–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khavul, S., & Bruton, G. D. (2013). Harnessing innovation for change: Sustainability and poverty in developing countries. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. M. (1984). A review of the causes of recent problems in the construction industry of Trinidad and Tobago. Construction Management and Economics, 2(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCool, S. F., & Stankey, G. H. (2004). Indicators of sustainability: Challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environmental Management, 33(3), 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X. (2012). The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2), 188–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah, J. V. (1997). Causes and effects of coastal sand mining in Ghana. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 18(1), 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oltean-Dumbrava, C., Watts, G. R., & Miah, A. H. S. (2013). “Top-Down-Bottom-Up” methodology as a common approach to defining bespoke sets of sustainability assessment criteria for the built environment. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1997). Competitive strategy. Measuring Business Excellence, 1(2), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prevatt, D. O., Dupigny-Giroux, L. A., & Masters, F. J. (2010). Engineering perspectives on reducing hurricane damage to housing in CARICOM Caribbean Islands. Natural Hazards Review, 11(4), 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruparathna, R., & Hewage, K. (2015). Sustainable procurement in the Canadian construction industry: Current practices, drivers and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahely, H. R., Kennedy, C. A., & Adams, B. J. (2005). Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 32(1), 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J. P., & Sheldon, R. A. (2015). Comparison of the sustainability metrics of the petrochemical and biomass-based routes to methionine. Catalysis Today, 239, 44–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shiers, D., Rapson, D., Roberts, C., & Keeping, M. (2006). Sustainable construction: The development and evaluation of an environmental profiling system for construction products. Construction Management and Economics, 24(11), 1177–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Pitt, M. (2009). Sustainable workplaces: Improving staff health and well-being using plants. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11(1), 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K., & Saunders, H. (2014). Competing policy packages and the complexity of energy security. Energy, 67, 641–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A., & Pittaway, L. (2005). Using knowledge within small and medium-sized firms: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 257–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugwu, O. O., Kumaraswamy, M. M., Wong, A., & Ng, S. T. (2006). Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP): Part 2: A case study in bridge design. Automation in Construction, 15(2), 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Aalst, M. K. (2006). The impacts of climate change on the risk of natural disasters. Disasters, 30(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. H., Lin, H. L., & Han, C. C. (2010). Analysis of international tourist arrivals in China: The role of world heritage sites. Tourism Management, 31(6), 827–837.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, H., & Yang, J. (2014). Research trends of post disaster reconstruction: The past and the future. Habitat International, 42, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olalekan Oshodi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oshodi, O., Aigbavboa, C. (2017). Theoretical Analysis of the Metrics for Measuring the Sustainability of Infrastructure Projects. In: Álvarez Fernández, R., Zubelzu, S., Martínez, R. (eds) Carbon Footprint and the Industrial Life Cycle. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54984-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54984-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54983-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54984-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics