Skip to main content

Vehicles of New Atheism: The Atheist Bus Campaign, Non-religious Representations and Material Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Atheism: Critical Perspectives and Contemporary Debates
  • 805 Accesses

Abstract

What unites New Atheist contributions in a single culture is their shared radical secularist critique of religion, made on philosophical or moral grounds. Discussion of New Atheism typically focuses on these intellectual aspects, attending to their coherence and impact. This chapter shifts attention from the ideal to the physical, demonstrating how New Atheism and related atheist cultural movements have impacted upon and worked through material environments. I argue that detailed analysis of the media via which New Atheist ideas are communicated reveals impacts and legacies that might otherwise be ignored. The Atheist Bus Campaign is used as a case study. This campaign has attracted much attention, focusing again on its intellectual and activist elements: the intentions behind it, the ideas expressed in it. In addition to this, however, the materiality of the campaign has shaped its impact and set its course in sometimes unexpected directions. The case of the bus campaign illustrates a broader argument that an investigation of the impact and legacy of New Atheism must look not only to its intellectual content but also to the social and cultural vehicles of that content and to their movement through time and space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Cotter (2011) for a review of the authors associated with New Atheism, as well as the particular claims of these authors to be considered of particular relevance to the movement.

  2. 2.

    I use the term ‘non-religious’ here according to the sense developed especially in Lee 2012a, b. In this, non-religious phenomena are those which are identified in contradistinction to religion – New Atheism is generally non-religious in this sense, but so too are informal practices such as the act of declining to participate in religious traditions (see also Campbell (2013 [1971]) on such specifically irreligious acts) or less oppositional forms of otherness such as experiences of curiosity in religious culture incited by a sense of its otherness and exoticism (Lee 2015b). This model understands ‘non-theism’ in the same vein, denoting phenomena identified in contradistinction to theism, while ‘areligion’ and ‘atheism’ denote the absence of relations with religion and theism, respectively. Finally, ‘secularity’ is treated as distinct from rather than synonymous with ‘non-religion’, denoting a situation in which ‘this-worldly’ rather than existential, metaphysical concerns are uppermost; religious and non-religious cultures tend to have secular aspects in this sense, but also tend not to be wholly secular. On different senses of core terms in this field, see also Bullivant and Lee (2016).

  3. 3.

    For example, recent controversy has surrounded a comment posted by Richard Dawkins on the social networking site, Twitter, reading, ‘All the world’s Muslims have fewer Nobel Prizes than Trinity College, Cambridge’. The comment provoked a hostile response from other Twitter users and in media discussions.

  4. 4.

    Zenk (2012, 39–40) draws the same association between the later German Atheist Bus Campaign and Neuer Atheismus in Germany.

  5. 5.

    See BHA (2013) for full list, and Zenk (2012) for a scholarly discussion of the German case.

  6. 6.

    I am indebted to Anna Strhan for this observation. See also Strhan’s (2012, 6–9) discussion of the bus campaign.

  7. 7.

    See Beckford (2012) for a critical introduction to the idea of ‘postsecularity’.

  8. 8.

    The census for England and Wales is conducted every ten years and, since 2001, has captured information concerning (non)religious affiliation. The inclusion of this question in 2001 was controversial and was included as the sole voluntary question on the census in respect of this. Compared to other large-scale surveys, the 2001 census found unusually high numbers of people associating with a religious organization—and unusually low numbers of people identifying as have no religion—and the BHA was one of several actors calling for a revision of ‘the religion question’ in the 2011 census. For further information, see Voas and Day (2007) and Day and Lee’s (2014) special issue of Religion, ‘Making Sense of Surveys and Censuses: Issues in Religious Self-Identification’.

  9. 9.

    For a more extensive analysis of this international dimension to the bus campaign, see Tomlins and Bullivant (2016).

  10. 10.

    Thanks to Lorna Mumford for sharing this example with me, drawn from data from her own on going research into organized non-religion in London (see Mumford 2015).

  11. 11.

    All names are changed.

  12. 12.

    See Cragun (2013) for an analysis of GoogleTrends data in relation to the US case.

References

  • Amarasingam, Amarnath, ed. 2010. Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, Justin, and Christopher Baker, eds. 2011a. Postsecular Cities: Space, Theory and Practice. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Introduction: The Rise of the Postsecular City. In Postsecular Cities: Space, Theory and Practice, ed. Justin Beaumont and Christopher Baker, 1–14. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckford, James A. 2012. SSSR Presidential Address: Public Religions and the Post-secular: Critical Reflections. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 51 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BHA. 2013. Humanism. http://humanism.org.uk/about/atheist-bus-campaign/. Accessed on 15 Jan 2014.

  • Blanes, Ruy Llera, and Oustinova-Stjepanovic, Galina. 2015. Godless People, Doubt, and Atheism. Social Analysis Special Issue 59(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullivant, Stephen. 2010. The New Atheism and Sociology: Why Here? Why Now? What Next? In Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal, ed. Amarnath Amarasingam, 109–124. Leiden: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bullivant, Stephen and Lee, Lois. 2016. The Oxford Dictionary of Atheism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bus Slogan Generator. n.d.. Available at http://ruletheweb.co.uk/b3ta/bus/. Accessed on 15 Apr 2012.

  • Campbell, Colin. 2013 [1971]. Toward a Sociology of Irreligion. Alcuin Academics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimino, Richard, and Christopher Smith. 2011. The New Atheism and the Formation of the Imagined Secularist Community. Journal of Media and Religion 10 (1): 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, Christopher R. 2011. Consciousness Raising: The Critique, Agenda, and Inherent Precariousness of Contemporary Anglophone Atheism. International Journal for the Study of New Religions 2 (1): 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cragun, Ryan. 2013. Does Atheist Movement Activism Increase Interest in Atheism? Nonreligion and Secularity blog, 25 September 2013. http://blog.nsrn.net/2013/09/25/does-atheist-movement-activism-increase-interest-in-atheism/. Accessed on 14 Jul 2014.

  • Cronin, Anne M. 2006. Advertising and the Metabolism of the City: Urban Spaces, Commodity Rhythms. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (4): 615–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Publics and Publicity: Outdoor Advertising and Urban Space. In Public Space, Media Space, ed. Chris Berry, Janet Harbord, and Rachel Moore, 265–276. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dant, Tim. 1999. Material Culture in the Social World: Values, Activities, Lifestyles. Buckingham: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard. 2006. The God Delusion. London: Transworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Abby, and Lee, Lois. 2014. Making Sense of Surveys and Censuses: Issues in Religious Self-Identification. Religion, Special Issue, 43(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Botton, Alain. 2012. Religion for Atheists: A Non-believer’s Guide to the Uses of Religion. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutkowski, Stacey. 2010. From Multiculturalism to Multifaithism? The Panel Debate. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 10 (2): 319–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Lois. 2012a. Talking About a Revolution: Terminology for the New Field of Nonreligion Studies. Journal of Contemporary Religion 27 (1): 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. Locating Nonreligion, in Mind, Body and Space: New Research Methods for a New Field. Annual Review of the Sociology of Religion 3: 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Western Europe. In The Oxford Handbook of Atheism, ed. Michael Ruse and Stephen Bullivant, 586–600. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015a. Ambivalent Atheist Identities: Power and Nonreligious Culture in Contemporary Britain. Social Analysis 59 (2): 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. Recognizing the Non-religious: Reimaging the Secular. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, Lorna. 2015. Living Nonreligious Identity in London. In Atheist Identities – Spaces and Social Contexts, ed. Lori G. Beaman and Steven Tomlins, 153–170. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, Sarah. 2006. The Future of Visual Anthropology: Engaging the Senses. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherine, Ariane. 2008. Atheists – Gimme Five. The Guardian (online), 20 June. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jun/20/transport.religion. Accessed 21 Feb 2011.

  • ———. 2010 [2009]. The Atheist’s Guide to Christmas. London: The Friday Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solid Documents. 2009. Friday Fun – Bus Slogan Generator, 30 January. Available at http://blog.soliddocuments.com/2009/01/friday-fun-bus-slogan-generator.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2013.

  • Strhan, Anna. 2012. Discipleship and Desire: Conservative Evangelicals, Coherence and the Moral Lives of the Metropolis. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Aliens and Strangers? The Struggle for Coherence in the Everyday Lives of Evangelicals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taira, Teemu. 2012. More Visible But Limited in Its Popularity: Atheism (and Atheists) in Finland. Approaching Religion 2 (1): 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, John B. 1995. Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlins, Stephen, and Spencer Culham Bullivant. 2016. The Atheist Bus Campaign: Global Manifestations and Responses. Leiden: BRILL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voas, David, and Abby Day. 2007. Secularity in Great Britain. In Secularism and Secularity: Contemporary International Perspectives, ed. Barry A. Kosmin and Ariela Keysar, 95–110. Hartford: ISSSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Matthew. 2007. Possession, Power and the New Age: Ambiguities of Authority in Neoliberal Societies. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenk, Thomas. 2012. ‘Neuer Atheismus’: ‘New Atheism’ in Germany. Approaching Religion 2 (1): 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lois Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, L. (2017). Vehicles of New Atheism: The Atheist Bus Campaign, Non-religious Representations and Material Culture. In: Cotter, C., Quadrio, P., Tuckett, J. (eds) New Atheism: Critical Perspectives and Contemporary Debates. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54964-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics