Abstract
In the paper we consider the factors that determine the overnight interest rates in the Polish interbank market (measured by the POLONIA rate index). In 2008 the Polish central bank (NBP) adapted the policy similar to the European Central Bank (ECB) and since then it has been trying to place the POLONIA rate around the NBP reference rate, mainly by influencing the liquidity conditions through open market operations. We try to answer the question how effective this control was. We identify a set of factors that determine overnight rates, namely: liquidity, expectations, confidence in the banking sector and central bank operations. We analyze to what degree each of these factor has been influencing the POLONIA rate in the period from 2006 to 2016. To this end we have used a non-standard econometric method, namely dynamic model averaging, which allows to identify the set of variables that provide the best description of the explanatory variable. The results reveal that before the outbreak of financial crisis in 2008 the spread between POLONIA rate and reference rate could be explained mainly by liquidity conditions. After the crisis had begun, the importance of liquidity factor decreased and the expectations played a more important role in determining the spread. The liquidity situation has regained its importance in determining the spread since the beginning of 2012, after the central bank had undertook appropriate measures to normalize the situation on the interbank market.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See for example remarks of Nate Silver (2012), who successfully used it to predict the results of the US presidential elections in 2012 in all 50 states.
- 2.
The technical details are omitted here due to limitations on the length of article. They can be found in Raftery et al. (2012), where the method was developed. In the later computations, instead of using the full specification of the matrices \( {Q}_t^k \) the estimators of covariance matrix from the prediction phase is used (multiplied by some specified forgetting index). One should note that the parameters \( {h}_t^k \), the standard deviations of the error term in eqn. (1), are not constant, which allows to account for heteroscedascity. As in Koop and Korobilis (2012) we estimate it using moving average of lagged observations.
- 3.
Alternatively, one can make estimations using all 256 possible models which can be build using all variables (assuming that variables y(−1), d_reqRes and d_reqRes1 should be present in each model) and then checking the influence of each variable. Such analysis was done and the results were very similar to the results of the analysis based on the four models. The analysis presented here has this advantage that the results are much easier to interpret.
- 4.
For example one of the goals of operational framework of European Central Bank is to eliminate the effects of expectations on EONIA rate. See for example (Linzert and Schmidt 2008).
References
Abbassi P, Nautz D (2010) Monetary transmission right from the start: the (dis)connection between the money market and the ECB’s main refinancing rates. FUB Discussion Paper 2010/7. econpapers.repec.org/paper/zbwfubsbe/20107.htm. Accessed 10 Jul 2016
De Socio A (2013) The interbank market after the financial turmoil: squeezing liquidity in a “lemons market” or asking liquidity “on tap”. J Bank Financ 37:1340–1358
Hassler U, Nautz D (2008) On the persistence of EONIA spread. Econ Lett 101:184–187
Hauck A, Neyer U (2014) A model of the Eurosystem’s operational framework and the euro overnight interbank market. Eur J Polit Econ 34:S65–S82
Kliber A, Płuciennik P (2011) An assessment of monetary policy effectiveness in POLONIA rate stabilization during financial crisis. Bank i Kredyt 42:5–30
Kliber A, Kliber P, Płuciennik P, Piwnicka M (2016) POLONIA dynamics during the years 2006–2012 and the effectiveness of the monetary policy of the National Bank of Poland. Empirica 43:37–59
Koop G, Korobilis D (2012) Forecasting inflation using dynamic model averaging. Int Econ Rev 53:867–886
Koop G, Tole L (2013) Forecasting the European carbon market. J R Stat Soc 176:723–741
Liznert T, Schmidt S (2008) What explains the spread between Euro overnight rate and the ECB’s policy rate. ECB Working Paper No. 983. www.ecb.europa.eu/pub. Accessed 18 Apr 2016
Nautz DC, Offermanns J (2007) The dynamic relationship between the Euro overnight rate, the ECB’s policy rate and the term spread. Int J Financ Econ 12:287–300
Raftery A, Karny M, Ettler P (2012) Online prediction under model uncertainty via dynamic model averaging: application to a cold rolling mill. Technometrics. 52:2–66
Schianchi A, Verga G (2006) A theoretical approach to the EONIA rate movements, SSRN Working Paper. ssrn.com/abstract=906793 or 10.2139/ssrn.906793. Accessed 3 May 2016
Silver N (2012) The signal and the noise. Penguin
Soares C, Rodriges PM (2011) Determinants of the EONIA spread and the financial crisis. Banko de Portugal Economic Bulletin 12/2011
Wetherilt VA (2003) Money market operations and short-term interest rate volatility in the United Kingdom. Appl Financ Econom 13:701–719
Würtz FR (2003) A comprehensive model on the euro overnight rate. ECB Working Paper Series, No 207
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kliber, P. (2017). Determinants of the Spread Between POLONIA Rate and the Reference Rate: Dynamic Model Averaging Approach. In: Jajuga, K., Orlowski, L., Staehr, K. (eds) Contemporary Trends and Challenges in Finance. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54885-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54885-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54884-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54885-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)