Skip to main content

How Management Control Systems Can Facilitate a Firm’s Strategic Renewal and Creation of Financial Intelligence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Real-time Strategy and Business Intelligence

Abstract

This chapter presents how management control systems and financial intelligence can facilitate a firm’s strategic renewal . Although the strategic accounting literature has recognized the importance of financial intelligence to a firm’s strategic decision making and formulation of strategy, the question of how a management control system (MCS) can help a firm to revamp and reallocate its resources has been overlooked in the prior strategy literature. In response, this chapter presents a conceptual model, which presents how advanced management accounting systems can foster a firm’s strategic renewal in light of the available theoretical foundations (the strategy implementation view, the dynamic capability perspective, and management accounting). This chapter advances managers’ understanding of firm’s renewal practices through the use of an MCS. Practical examples have been used to illustrate how firms renew their business operations in practice .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anthony, R., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management control systems. New York: Irwing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, F., & Masini, A. (2011). Balancing specialized and generic capabilities in the provision of integrated solutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(1), 91–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (1999). A practical use of key success factors to improve the effectiveness of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 17(3), 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2011). Trying to become a different type of company: Dynamic capability at Smith Corona. Strategic Management Journal, 32(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2014). Finance analytics: The three minute guide. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Deloitte-Analytics/dttl-analytics-us-da-3minFinanceAnalytics.pdf.

  • Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2007). The new deal at the top. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith M., Crossan M., & Niccolini, M. D. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, J. A., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Sull, D. (2001). Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu, A. (2014). Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huikkola, T., Kohtamäki, M., & Rabetino, R. (2016). Resource realignment in servitization. Research-Technology Management, 59(4), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuwada, K. (1998). Strategic learning: The continuous side of discontinuous strategic change. Organizational Science, 9(6), 719–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitinen, E. K., Länsiluoto, A., & Rautiainen, I. (2009). Extracting appropriate scope for information systems: A case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(3), 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langfield-Smith, K. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: A critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, C., & Vickers-Koch, M. (1995). Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 24(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maciariello, J., & Kirby, C. (1994). Management control systems—Using adaptive systems to attain control. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, D., & Chan, Y. E. (2007). A delphi study of knowledge management systems: Scope and requirements. Information & Management, 44(6), 583–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015). How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review, 93(10), 96–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, E., & Rosenberg, J. (2014). How Google works (p. 304). New York: Grand Central Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirén, C., Hakala, H., Wincent, J., & Grichnik, D. (2016). Breaking the routines: Entrepreneurial orientation, strategic learning, firm size, and age. Long Range Planning. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2016.09.005

  • Sirmon, D., & Hitt, M. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sull, D. (2009). The upside of turbulence: Seizing opportunity in an uncertain world. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekavčič, M., Peljhan, D., & Šević, Z. (2008). Levers of control: Analysis of management control systems in a Slovenian Company. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 24(4), 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. B., Sussman, S. W., & Henderson, J. C. (2001). Organizational learning, knowledge management, and sensemaking. Organization Science, 12(3), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, S. (2005). Towards an integrated contingency framework for MAS sophistication: Case studies on the scope of accounting instruments in Dutch power and gas companies. Management Accounting Research, 16, 101–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2011). Concepts in strategic management and business policy: Toward global sustainability. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuomas Huikkola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huikkola, T., Koulumies, A., Laukkanen, V. (2017). How Management Control Systems Can Facilitate a Firm’s Strategic Renewal and Creation of Financial Intelligence. In: Kohtamäki, M. (eds) Real-time Strategy and Business Intelligence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54846-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics