Advertisement

Bringing Together Political Communication and Critical Event Studies

  • Ian R. Lamond
  • Chelsea Reid
Chapter
  • 280 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, we introduce a theoretical framework that combines the established field of political communication with the emerging one of critical event studies (CES). In order to introduce this framework we briefly outline a history of political communication and the philosophical foundations of CES. Though not commonly seen to be connected, we argue that an understanding of ‘event’ that goes beyond simplistic economic and commercially driven definitions, to one that construes it as disruption and contestation, can relocate event studies as a central aspect of critical social science research. We argue that by combining both fields, new approaches and new ways of interpreting the discourses associated with a political imaginary, or a dominant hegemony, can be identified.

Keywords

Events Political imaginary Hegemony 

References

  1. Aristotle, (2004) Rhetoric. Translated by W.R. Roberts New York: Dover Thrift Edition.Google Scholar
  2. Badiou, A. (2013) Philosophy and the Event. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. (2009) Rabelais and his World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dalton, R. J. (2008) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. (5th Ed.) Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  5. Della Porta, D. (2008) ‘Eventful protests, global conflicts’, Dinstinktion, Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 9, 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Derrida, J. (2001) Writing and Difference. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (2001) The Order of Things: Archaeology of the Human Science, translated by A.M.S. Smith. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Getz, D. (2007) Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  9. Habermas, J. (1996) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1995) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Hutchby, I. (1996) Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries and Power on Talk Radio. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Kaid, L. L. (2004) Handbook of Political Communications Research. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Kavaratzis, M. (2005) ‘Place branding: A review of trends and conceptual models’, The Marketing Review, 5, 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keane, J. (2013) Democracy and Media Decadence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koçan, G. (2008) ‘Models of Public Sphere in Political Philosophy’, Eurosphere Working Papers Series, [Online article], available from http://eurosphere.uib.no/knowledgebase/workingpapers.htm [Accessed 4 January 2017].
  16. Lamond, I. R., Kilbride, C., & Spracklen, K. (2015) The construction of contested public spheres: Discourses of protest and identity in a British campaigning organisation. In Protests as Events: Politics, Activism and Leisure. I. R. Lamond, & K. Spracklen, (Eds.). (London: Rowman & Littlefield International)Google Scholar
  17. Lamond, I. R., & Spracklen, K. (2015) Protests as Event: Politics, Activism and Leisure. London: Rowman & Littlefield international.Google Scholar
  18. Lopez, R. S. (1956) ‘The evolution of land transport in the Middle Ages’, Past & Present, 9, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lopez, R. S. (1976) The Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages: 950 – 1350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lovejoy, A. O. (2001) The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. McLuhan, M. (2001) Understanding Media. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Nevins, A. (1959) ‘American journalism and its historical treatment’, Journalism Quarterly, 36, 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Outram, D. (2013) The Enlightenment. (3rd Ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Perloff, R. M. (2014) The Dynamics of Political Communication: Media and Politics in a Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Plato, (2003) Gorgias and Timaeus. translated by B. Jowett New York: Dover Thrift Edition.Google Scholar
  26. Plato, (2008) Republic. translated by R. Waterfield Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rancière, J. (2015) Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  28. Robinson, P., Wale, D., & Dickson, G. (Eds.) (2010) Events Management. Wallingford: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robinson, R. (2015) Music Festivals and the Politics of Participation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Roche, M. (2000) Mega-Events and Modernity: Olympics and Expos in the Growth of Global Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Sanders, K. (2009) Communicating Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Basingstoke,: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spracklen, K., & Lamond, I. R. (2016) Critical Event Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Street, J. (2011) Mass Media, Politics and Democracy. (2nd Ed.) Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. The Times (1935) The History of “The Times”: The Thunderer in the Making. 1785-1841. London: The Times.Google Scholar
  35. Thorley, J. (2004) Athenian Democracy. (2nd Ed.) Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Wring, D., Mortimore, R., & Atkinson, S. (Eds.) (2017) Political Communication in Britain: Polling, Campaigning and Media in the 2015 Election. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Zizek, S. (2009) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  38. Zizek, S. (2014) Event: Philosophy in Transit. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. Zizek, S. (2016) Disparities. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  40. McNair, B. (2011) An Introduction to Political Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian R. Lamond
    • 1
  • Chelsea Reid
    • 2
  1. 1.Leeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Leeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations