Skip to main content

Duplex Ultrasound Imaging of the Radial Artery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis

Abstract

Radial artery duplex ultrasound diagnostics is used in a variety of patient-specific clinical scenarios. Clinical applications include the use to document anatomic changes of the radial artery in patients with hypertension, end-stage renal disease, and coronary artery disease. Radial artery duplex testing is used for preoperative mapping of the radial artery to determine suitability prior to harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting and in conjunction with forearm muscle flaps. Testing is performed to verify adequate conduit diameter, free from disease, and to minimize the risk of hand ischemia after excision and ligation. Radial artery duplex imaging is also performed to assess suitability for transradial coronary interventions and to evaluate patency after cannulation. Upper extremity arterial duplex mapping is useful for dialysis access planning and used prior to construction of a radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula to exclude the use of the calcified or small caliber radial artery, parameters associated with maturation failure. This chapter details our protocol for radial artery duplex ultrasound testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gray H. Anatomy of the human body. 20th ed. New York: Bartelby.com; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zielinski T, Dzielinska Z, Januszewicz A, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness as a marker of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20(10):1058–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chowdhury UK, Airan B, Mishra PK, et al. Histopathology and morphometry of radial artery conduits: basic study and clinical application. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(5):1614–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruengsakulrach P, Brooks M, Sinclair R, Hare D, Gordon I, Buxton B. Prevalence and prediction of calcification and plaques in radial artery grafts by ultrasound. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(2):398–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Razuvaev A, Lund K, Roy J, Hedin U, Caidahl K. Noninvasive real-time imaging of intima thickness after rat carotid artery balloon injury using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Atherosclerosis. 2008;199(2):310–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Myredal A, Gan LM, Osika W, Friberg P, Johansson M. Increased intima thickness of the radial artery in individuals with prehypertension and hypertension. Atherosclerosis. 2010;209(1):147–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Myredal A, Osika W, Li Ming G, Friberg P, Johansson M. Increased intima thickness of the radial artery in patients with coronary heart disease. Vasc Med. 2010;15(1):33–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johansson M, Myredal A, Friberg P, Gan LM. High-resolution ultrasound showing increased intima and media thickness of the radial artery in patients with end-stage renal disease. Atherosclerosis. 2010;211(1):159–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Failla M, Giannattasio C, Piperno A, et al. Radial artery wall alterations in genetic hemochromatosis before and after iron depletion therapy. Hepatology. 2000;32(3):569–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Serricchio M, Gaudino M, Tondi P, et al. Hemodynamic and functional consequences of radial artery removal for coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84(11):1353–6. A1358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nunoo-Mensah J. An unexpected complication after harvesting of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(3):929–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sullivan VV, Higgenbotham C, Shanley CJ, et al. Can ulnar artery velocity changes be used as a preoperative screening tool for radial artery grafting in coronary artery bypass? Ann Vasc Surg. 2003;17(3):253–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Starnes SL, Wolk SW, Lampman RM, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of hand circulation before radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117(2):261–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levinsohn DG, Gordon L, Sessler DI. The Allen’s test: analysis of four methods. J Hand Surg. [Am.]. 1991;16(2):279–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Winkler J, Lohr J, Rizwan H. Evaluation of the radial artery for use in coronary artery bypass grafting. J Vasc Technol. 1998;22(1):23–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fuhrman TM, Pippin WD, Talmage LA, Reilley TE. Evaluation of collateral circulation of the hand. J Clin Monit. 1992;8(1):28–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pola P, Serricchio M, Flore R, Manasse E, Favuzzi A, Possati GF. Safe removal of the radial artery for myocardial revascularization: a Doppler study to prevent ischemic complications to the hand. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112(3):737–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenhow DE. Incorrect performance of Allen’s test--ulnar-artery flow erroneously presumed inadequate. Anesthesiology. 1972;37(3):356–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmerman P, Chin E, Laifer-Narin S, Ragavendra N, Grant EG. Radial artery mapping for coronary artery bypass graft placement. Radiology. 2001;220(2):299–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomson PJ, Musgrove BT. Preoperative vascular assessment: an aid to radial forearm surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;35(6):419–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganesan K, Stead L, Smith AB, Ong TK, Mitchell DA, Kanatas AN. Duplex in the assessment of the free radial forearm flaps: is it time to change practice? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48(6):423–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ciria-Llorens G, Gomez-Cia T, Talegon-Melendez A. Analysis of flow changes in forearm arteries after raising the radial forearm flap: a prospective study using colour duplex imaging. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52(6):440–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoo BS, Yoon J, Ko JY, et al. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. Int J Cardiol. 2005;101(3):421–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagai S, Abe S, Sato T, et al. Ultrasonic assessment of vascular complications in coronary angiography and angioplasty after transradial approach. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83(2):180–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoo BS, Lee SH, Ko JY, et al. Procedural outcomes of repeated transradial coronary procedure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;58(3):301–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wakeyama T, Ogawa H, Iida H, et al. Intima-media thickening of the radial artery after transradial intervention. An intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(7):1109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanmartin M, Goicolea J, Ocaranza R, Cuevas D, Calvo F. Vasoreactivity of the radial artery after transradial catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16(11):635–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Madssen E, Haere P, Wiseth R. Radial artery diameter and vasodilatory properties after transradial coronary angiography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(5):1698–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lemson MS, Leunissen KM, Tordoir JH. Does pre-operative duplex examination improve patency rates of Brescia-Cimino fistulas? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(6):1360–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Parmar J, Aslam M, Standfield N. Pre-operative radial arterial diameter predicts early failure of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for haemodialysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(1):113–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hamish M, Geddoa E, Reda A, et al. Relationship between vessel size and vascular access patency based on preoperatively ultrasound Doppler. Int Surg. 2008;93(1):6–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brimble KS, Rabbat CG, Schiff D, Ingram AJ. The clinical utility of Doppler ultrasound prior to arteriovenous fistula creation. Semin Dial. 2001;14(5):314–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Malovrh M. Non-invasive evaluation of vessels by duplex sonography prior to construction of arteriovenous fistulas for haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(1):125–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wong V, Ward R, Taylor J, Selvakumar S, How TV, Bakran A. Factors associated with early failure of arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;12(2):207–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Clement Darling III MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Review Questions

Review Questions

  1. 1.

    Which of the following statements regarding the technical aspects of radial artery duplex ultrasound testing is TRUE?

    1. a.

      A low-velocity scale assignment applied to color flow and duplex velocity scale decreases sensitivity.

    2. b.

      High-frequency transducers improve resolution of small, superficial vessels.

    3. c.

      For vein mapping, environmental considerations such as ambient room temperature are inconsequential.

    4. d.

      Beam steering is infrequently needed to improve color flow and Doppler signals.

  2. 2.

    Which is the strongest contraindication to radial artery harvest for CABG?

    1. a.

      History of Raynaud’s syndrome

    2. b.

      Incomplete superficial palmar arch

    3. c.

      Distant ulna fracture during childhood

    4. d.

      High origin of the radial artery

  3. 3.

    Which of the following statements regarding radial artery duplex ultrasound assessment is TRUE?

    1. a.

      Variation in palmar arch anatomy is relatively rare, occurring in 3–6% of the population.

    2. b.

      The Allen test is performed by compressing the radial artery alone to subjectively assess hand perfusion.

    3. c.

      The Allen test is considered the gold standard for assessing adequate hand perfusion by the ulnar artery.

    4. d.

      The duplex ultrasound Allen test uses the direction of flow in the superficial palmar arch to assess perfusion after radial artery compression.

Answer Key

  1. 1.

    b

  2. 2.

    b

  3. 3.

    d

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hnath, J.C., Warner, C.J., Roddy, S.P., Clement Darling, R. (2017). Duplex Ultrasound Imaging of the Radial Artery. In: AbuRahma, A. (eds) Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54760-2_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54760-2_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54758-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54760-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics