Skip to main content

Segmental Doppler Pressures and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Peripheral Vascular Disease of the Lower Extremities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2250 Accesses

Abstract

Segmental Doppler pressures and Doppler waveform analysis are important tools in the diagnosis of patients with peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremities. A complete arterial lower extremity Doppler examination consists of three components: (1) analysis of the arterial analog wave tracing, (2) measurement of the segmental systolic limb pressures, and (3) calculation of the ankle-brachial index (ABI).

Doppler segmental pressures have the same capabilities of analog wave tracing, i.e., to help in identifying the presence and severity of arterial occlusive disease, to provide an objective baseline to follow the progression of peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremity and/or the postoperative course, and to somewhat evaluate the treatment plan.

Four 12 × 40 pneumatic cuffs are applied at various levels on each leg: as high on the thigh as possible, just above the knee, just below the knee, and above the ankle. The examiner then listens to the posterior tibial and the dorsalis pedis arterial signals. Of these vessels, the one with the strongest Doppler signal is chosen for the ankle pressure. High-thigh, above-knee, below-knee, and ankle pressure readings are taken.

Another component of the arterial lower extremity Doppler examination is the calculation of the ABI. It is generally agreed upon that an ABI of 0.9–1.0 signifies normalcy or minimal arterial occlusive disease, an ABI of 0.5–0.9 signifies a claudication level, less than 0.5 signifies the presence of ischemic rest pain or severe arterial occlusive disease, and less than 0.3 is compatible with trophic changes of the lower extremities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Satomura S. Study of flow patterns in peripheral arteries by ultrasonics. J Acoust Soc Jpn. 1959;15:151–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Strandness DE Jr, McCutcheon EP, Rushmer RF. Application of transcutaneous Doppler flow meter in evaluation of occlusive arterial disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1966;122:1039–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirkendall WM, Burton AC, Epstein FH, et al. Recommendation for human blood pressure determinations by sphygmomanometers: report of sub-committee of the postgraduate education committee, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1967;36:980–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes RW. Noninvasive diagnostic techniques and peripheral vascular disease. Am Heart J. 1979;97:241–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holland T. Utilizing the ankle brachial index in clinical practice. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002;48:38–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adam DJ, Naik J, Hartshorne T, Bello M, London NJ. The diagnosis and management of 689 chronic leg ulcers in a single-visit assessment clinic. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25:462–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carser DG. Do we need to reappraise our method of interpreting the ankle brachial pressure index? J Wound Care. 2001;10:59–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yao JST, Bergan JJ. Predictability of vascular reactivity to sympathetic ablation. Arch Surg. 1973;106:676–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA. Clinical parameters for predicting response to lumbar sympathectomy with severe lower limb ischemia. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;31:101–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnes RW, Shanik GD, Slaymaker EE. An index of healing of below knee amputation: leg blood pressure by Doppler ultrasound. Surgery. 1976;79:13–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sumner DS, Strandness DE Jr. An abnormal finger pulse associated with cold sensitivity. Ann Surg. 1972;175:294–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Barnes RW. Noninvasive assessment of arteriovenous fistula. Angiology. 1978;29:691–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McLafferty RB, Moneta GL, Taylor LM Jr, Porter JM. Ability of ankle-brachial index to detect lower extremity atherosclerotic disease progression. Arch Surg. 1997;132:836–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gornik HL, Garcia B, Wolski K, Jones DC, MacDonald KA, Fronek A. Validation of a method for determination of the ankle-brachial index in the seated position. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;48(5):1204–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson KW, Maruzzo BC, Kassam M, et al. Methods for obtaining processing and quantifying Doppler blood flow velocity waveforms. In: JST Y, Nicolaides AN, editors. Basic investigation in vascular disease. London: Churchill Livingstone, Inc.; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Tongeren RB, Bastiaansen AJ, Van Wissen RC, Le Cessie S, Hamming JF, Van Bockel JH. A comparison of the Doppler-derived maximal systolic acceleration versus the ankle pressure index or detecting and quantifying peripheral arterial occlusive disease in diabetic patients. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jun;51(3):391–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gerhard-Herman M, Gardin JM, Jaff M, Mohler E, Roman M, Naqvi TZ. Guidelines for noninvasive vascular laboratory testing: a report from the American society of echocardiography and the society for vascular medicine and biology. Vasc Med. 2006;11(3):183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khan TH, Farooqui FA, Niazik K. Critical review of the ankle brachial index. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2008;4(2):101–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZT, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA ask Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease). J Am Coll Car. 2006;47:e1–192.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Diehm C, Kareem S, Diehm N, Jansen T, Lawall H. Does calculation of ankle brachial pressure index need revision? Vascular. 2005;34:123–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Murabito JM, Evans JC, Larson MG, Nieto K, Levy D, Wilson PW. Framingham study. The ankle-brachial index in the elderly and risk of stroke, coronary disease and death. Arch Intern Med. 2003;63:1939–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Newmann AB, Shemanski L, Manolio TA, et al. Ankle-arm index as a predictor of Cardiovascular disease and mortality in the Cardiovascular Health study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Bio. 1999;19:538–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhamidipaty V, Dean A, Yap SL, Firth J, Barron M, Allard B, Chan ST. Second toe systolic pressure measurements are valid substitutes for first toe systolic pressure measurements in diabetic patients: a prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Jan;49(1):77–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Toursarkissian B, Mejia A, Smilanich RP, Schoolfield J, Shireman PK, Sykes MT. Noninvasive localization of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease in diabetics. Ann Vasc Surg. 2001;15:73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brooks B, Dean R, Patel S, Wu B, Molyneaux L, Yue DK. TBI or not TBI: that is the question. Is it better to measure toe pressure than ankle pressure in diabetic patients? Diabet Med. 2001;18(12):528–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Orchard TJ, Strandness DE. Assessment of peripheral vascular disease in diabetes: report and recommendations of an international workshop sponsored by the American Diabetes Association. Circulation. 1992;88(2):819–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. TASC. Management of peripheral arterial disease: transatlantic intersociety consensus. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Sur. 2000;19(Suppl. A):S1–250.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bonham PA, Cappuccio M, Hulsey T, Michel Y, Kelechi T, Jenkins C, Robison J. Are ankle and toe brachial indices (ABI-TBI) obtained by a pocket Doppler interchangeable with those obtained by standard laboratory equipment? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses Soc. 2007;34(1):35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cutajar CL, Marston A, Newcoumbe JF. Value of cuff occlusion pressures in assessment of peripheral vascular disease. BMJ. 1973;2:392–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams DT, Price P, Harding KG. The influence of diabetes and lower limb arterial disease on cutaneous foot perfusion. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:770–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hoyer C, Sandermann J, Petersen LJ. The toe-brachial index in the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):231–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stoekenbroek RM, Ubbink DT, Reekers JA, Koelemay MJ. Hide and seek: does the toe-brachial index allow for earlier recognition of peripheral arterial disease in diabetic patients? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(2):192–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Quong WL, Fung AT, Yu RY, Hsiang YN. Reassessing the normal toe-brachial index in young healthy adults. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Mar;63(3):652–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tehan P, Bray A, Keech R, Rounsley R, Carruthers A, Chuter VH. Sensitivity and specificity of the toe-brachial index for detecting peripheral arterial disease: initial findings. J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Oct;34(10):1737–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Park SC, Choi CY, Ha YI, Yang HE. Utility of toe-brachial index for diagnosis of peripheral artery disease. Arch Plast Surg. 2012 May;39(3):227–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Bunte MC, Jacob J, Nudelman B, Shishehbor MH. Validation of the relationship between ankle-brachial and toe-brachial indices and infragenicular arterial patency in critical limb ischemia. Vasc Med. 2015 Feb;20(1):23–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sawka AM, Carter SA. The effect of temperature on digital systolic pressures in the lower limb in arterial disease. Circulation. 1992;85:1097–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Carter SA, Tate RB. The effect of body heating and cooling on the ankle and toe systolic pressures in arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 1992;16:148–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. AbuRahma AF, Diethrich EB, Reiling M. Doppler testing in peripheral vascular occlusive disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980;150:26–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. AbuRahma AF, Diethrich EB. Doppler ultrasound in evaluating the localization and severity of peripheral vascular occlusive disease. South Med J. 1979;72:1425–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McDermott MM, Liu K, Criqui MH, et al. Ankle-brachial index and subclinical cardiac and carotid disease. The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Diehm C, Schuster A, Allenberg JR, et al. High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and co-morbidity in 6880 primary care patients: cross-sectional study. Atherosclerosis. 2004;172:95–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dormundy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. Trans Atlantic Inter Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg. 2000;31(1pt2):S1–296.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schroder F, Diehm N, Kareem S, et al. A modified method of ankle-brachial pressure index is far more sensitive in the detection of peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Sep;44(3):532–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Niazi K, Khan TH, Easley KA. Diagnostic utility of the two methods of ankle brachial index in the detection of the peripheral arterial disease of lower extremities. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Nov;68(5):788–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Espinola-Klein C, Rupprecht HJ, Bickel C, Lackner K, Savvidis S, Messow CM, Munzel T, Blankenberg S. AtheroGene investigators. Circulation. 2008;118(9):961–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lange SF, Trampisch HJ, Pittrow D, Darius H, Mahn M, Allenberg JR, Tepohl G, Haberl RL, Diehm C, getABI Study Group. Profound influence of different methods for determination of the ankle brachial index on the prevalence estimate of peripheral arterial disease. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Hatsukami TS, Primozich JF, Zierler RE. Color Doppler imaging of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 1992;16:527–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Moneta GL, Yeager RA, Lee RW. Noninvasive localization of arterial occlusive disease: a comparison of segmental Doppler pressures and arterial duplex mapping. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:578–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Collier P, Wilcox G, Brooks D. Improved patient selection for angioplasty utilizing color Doppler imaging. Am J Surg. 1990;160:171–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cossman DV, Ellison JE, Wagner WH, et al. Comparison of contrast arteriography to arterial mapping with color-flow duplex imaging in the lower extremities. J Vasc Surg. 1989;10:522–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. AbuRahma AF, Khan S, Robinson PA. Selective use of segmental Doppler pressures and color duplex imaging in the localization of arterial occlusive disease of the lower extremity. Surgery. 1995;118:496–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Flanigan DP, Ballard JL, Robinson D, Galliano M, Blecker G, Harward TR. Duplex ultrasound of the superficial femoral artery is a better screening tool than ankle-brachia index to identify at risk patients with lower extremity atherosclerosis. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Apr;47(4):789–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Feigelson HS, Criqui MH, Fronek A. Screening for peripheral arterial disease: the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of noninvasive tests in a defined population. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:526–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gosling RG, King DH. Continuous wave ultrasound as an alternative and compliment to X-rays in vascular examination. In: Rebeman RS, editor. Cardiovascular applications of ultrasound. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishers; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Harris PL, Taylor LA, Cave FD, et al. The relationship between Doppler ultrasound assessment and angiography in occlusive arterial disease of the lower limbs. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;138:911–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Johnson KW, Cobbold RSC, Kassam M, et al. Real time frequency analysis of peripheral arterial Doppler signals. In: Diethrich EB, editor. Noninvasive cardiovascular diagnosis. Littleton: PSG Publishing; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gale SS, Scissons RP, Salles-Cunha SX, et al. Lower extremity arterial evaluation: are segmental arterial blood pressures worthwhile? J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:831–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. AbuRahma AF. Correlation of the resting and exercise Doppler ankle arm index to the symptomatology and to the angiographic findings. In: Diethrich EB, editor. Noninvasive assessment of the cardiovascular system. Littleton: John Wright-PSG, Inc.; 1982. p. 287–90.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Strandness DE Jr, Bell JW. An evaluation of the hemodynamic response of the claudicating extremity to exercise. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964;119:1237–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Quriel K, McDowell AE, Metz CE, et al. Critical evaluation of stress testing in the diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease. Surgery. 1982;91:686–93.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Carroll RM, Rose HB, Vyden J, et al. Cardiac arrhythmias associated with treadmill claudication testing. Surgery. 1978;83:284–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Baker JD, Daix D. Variability of Doppler ankle pressures with arterial occlusive disease: an evaluation of ankle index and brachial ankle gradient. Surgery. 1981;89:134–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Halperin JI. Evaluation of patients with peripheral vascular disease. Thromb Res. 2002;106:V303–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, Allison MA, Creager MA, Diehm C, Fowkes FG, Hiatt WR, Jonsson B, Lacroix P, Marin B, McDarmott MM, Norgren L, Pande RL, Preny PM, Stoffers HE, Treat-Jacobson D, American Heart Association Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia. Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial index: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126(24):2890–909.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Dachun X, Jue L, Liling Z, Yawei X, Dayi H, Pagoto SL, Yunsheng M. Sensitivity and specificity of the ankle-brachial index to diagnose peripheral artery disease: a structured review. Vasc Med. 2010;15:361–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Guo X, Li J, Pang W, Zhao M, Luo Y, Sun Y, Hu D. Sensitivity and specificity of ankle-brachial index for detecting angiographic stenosis of peripheral arteries. Circ J. 2008;72:605–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lijmer JG, Hunink MG, van den Dungen JJ, Loonstra J, Smit AJ. ROC analysis of noninvasive tests for peripheral arterial disease. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22:391–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Williams DT, Harding KG, Price P. An evaluation of the efficacy of methods used in screening for lower-limb arterial disease in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2206–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wilkstrom J, Hansen T, Johansson L, Lind L, Ahlstrom H. Ankle Brachial index <0.9 underestimates the prevalence of peripheral artery occlusive disease assessed with whole-body magnetic resonance angiography in the elderly. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:143–9.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Carter SA. Response of ankle systolic pressure to leg exercise in the mild or questionable arterial disease. N Engl J Med. 1972;287:578–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Van Langen H, Van Gurp J, Rubbens L. Interobserver variability of ankle-brachial index measurements at rest and post exercise in patients with intermittent claudication. Vasc Med. 2009;14(3):221–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Espeland MA, Regensteiner JG, Javamillo SA, Gregg E, Knowler WC, Wagenknecht LE, Bahnson J, Haffner S, Hill J, Hiatt WR, LookAHEAD Study Group. Measurement characteristics of the ankle-brachial index: results from the action for health in diabetes study. Vasc Med. 2008;13(3):225–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen M. Hass MD, JD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Review Questions

Review Questions

  1. 1.

    According to the most recent evidence-based medicine, which is the preferred initial noninvasive test to evaluate a patient for the presence of peripheral arterial disease?

    1. a.

      Segmental Doppler pressure measurements

    2. b.

      Duplex ultrasound

    3. c.

      Treadmill exercise testing

    4. d.

      Toe pressure measurements

    5. e.

      Ankle-brachial index

  2. 2.

    A diabetic patient presents with an ulcer on the first and second toes on the left foot. The initial ankle to brachial index result is 1.6. What is the next preferred noninvasive test?

    1. a.

      Duplex ultrasound

    2. b.

      Toe pressure measurement/toe-brachial index

    3. c.

      Segmental Doppler pressure measurements

    4. d.

      Treadmill exercise testing

  3. 3.

    A patient presents with significant claudication of less than one-half block. He has failed medical management and requires regular ambulation at his employment. He is also a mild diabetic with a history of lower back surgery. What would be the next ideal noninvasive evaluation if an intervention is being considered?

    1. a.

      Duplex ultrasound alone

    2. b.

      Ankle-brachial index alone

    3. c.

      Segmental pressure measurements including the ankle-brachial index

    4. d.

      Duplex ultrasound including the ankle-brachial index

  4. 4.

    Which patient would most likely benefit from treadmill testing?

    1. a.

      A 70-year-old nondiabetic male with bilateral lower extremity discomfort in his calves with ambulation less than one block, no positional or at rest discomfort in his lower extremities, and diminished ankle-brachial indices bilaterally

    2. b.

      An 81-year-old female with rest pain in her left foot and a severely diminished left ankle to brachial index.

    3. c.

      A 69-year-old diabetic male with disabling claudication in both legs, known lower extremity diabetic neuropathy, ankle-brachial indices of 0.95 on the right and 0.89 on the left, and a recent history of exertional angina

    4. d.

      A 63-year-old obese female with bilateral lower extremity fatigue and weakness with ambulation of less than one block, complaints of lower extremity and hip pain after standing for long periods of time, and ankle-brachial indices of 0.88 on the right and 0.86 on the left

Answer Key

  1. 1.

    e

  2. 2.

    b

  3. 3.

    d

  4. 4.

    d

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hass, S.M., AbuRahma, A.F. (2017). Segmental Doppler Pressures and Doppler Waveform Analysis in Peripheral Vascular Disease of the Lower Extremities. In: AbuRahma, A. (eds) Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54760-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54760-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54758-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54760-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics