Abstract
The mammalian signal transduction network relays detailed information about the presence and concentration of ligands on the outside of the cell to the nucleus, and alters cellular behaviour by changing gene expression. Since signal transduction pathways exhibit striking similarities to typical communication systems, the framework of information theory can be directly applied to better understand cellular signalling. During the current funding period of the priority program InKoMBio, we determined the information transmission capacities of the prototypic MAPK pathway using a combination of single cell experimentation and information theoretical calculations. Surprisingly, our results indicate that the signalling network transmits less than one bit of information. Rather than faithfully reporting extracellular concentrations of the ligand EGF, it responds in a binary manner. In addition, molecular noise interferes with a robust encoding of the presence of the input signal, limiting the information content even further. We observed similarly limited channel capacities for two other signalling pathways, the TGF\(\beta \)/SMAD and p53 networks. As many studies in different biological model systems suggest that cells can gain more information than 1-bit about their environment using signalling pathways, we aim to investigate what is limiting the information transmission capabilities at the single cell level and how cells maximise the amount of information gained from external and internal sources to ensure a proper physiological response. We hypothesise that the pathways integrate information from the cellular context, which could explain the apparently low-channel capacity. We therefore propose to use information theory, single cell experimentation and mathematical modelling to study the influence of contextual information, by addressing the following specific questions: (i) how does the state of a cell influence the response to an external signal, (ii) how does the context of previous stimuli influence the response and (iii) what are common principles of context-dependent signalling across different pathways? We will use live-cell imaging and immunofluorescence assays to measure signalling and context, and calculate the contribution of contextual information using conditional mutual information, context trees and parsimonious Bayesian networks. To gain a predictive understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms, we will expand existing mathematical models of the pathways to include the interacting regulatory processes that provide context and analyse their information theoretical properties. Using network perturbations, we will experimentally validate model predictions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPublications Within the Project
Schmiedel JM et al (2015) Gene expression. MicroRNA control of protein expression noise. TL - 348. Science (New York) 348(6230):128–132
Other Publications
Adachi M, Fukuda M, Nishida E (1999) Two co-existing mechanisms for nuclear import of MAP kinase: passive diffusion of a monomer and active transport of a dimer. EMBO J 18(19):5347–5358
Batchelor E, Loewer A, Lahav G (2009) The ups and downs of p53: understanding protein dynamics in single cells. Nat Rev. Cancer 9(5):371–377
Batchelor E et al (2011) Stimulus-dependent dynamics of p53 in single cells. Mol Syst Biol 7:488
Blüthgen N, Legewie S (2008) Systems analysis of MAPK signal transduction. Essays Biochem 45:95–107
Cheong R et al (2011) Information transduction capacity of noisy biochemical signaling networks. Science 334(6054):354–358
Cohen AA et al (2008) Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug. Science (New York) 322(5907):1511–1516
Cohen-Saidon C et al (2009) Dynamics and variability of ERK2 response to EGF in individual living cells. Mol Cell 36(5):885–893
Ebert MS, Sharp PA (2012) Roles for microRNAs in conferring robustness to biological processes. Cell 149(3):515–524. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867412004643
Gatenby RA, Frieden BR (2007) Information theory in living systems, methods, applications, and challenges. Bull Math Biol 69(2):635–657
Ghiglione C, Perrimon N, Perkins LA (1999) Quantitative variations in the level of MAPK activity control patterning of the embryonic termini in Drosophila. Dev Biol 205(1):181–193. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012160698991023
Heinrich R, Neel BG, Rapoport TA (2002) Mathematical models of protein kinase signal transduction. Mol Cell 9(5):957–970
Jones TR et al (2008) CellProfiler analyst: data exploration and analysis software for complex image-based screens. BMC Bioinform 9(1):482. http://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-9482
Kamentsky L et al (2011) Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 27(8):1179–1180
Kholodenko BN (2006) Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space. Nat Rev. Mol Cell Biol 7(3):165–176
Kruse J-P, Gu W (2009) Modes of p53 regulation. Cell 137(4):609–622
Marshall CJ (1995) Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell 80(2):179–185
Mukherji S et al (2011) MicroRNAs can generate thresholds in target gene expression. Nat Genet 43(9):854–859. doi:10.1038/ng.905
Panzeri S, Treves A (1996) Analytical estimates of limited sampling biases in different information measures. Netw: Comput Neural Syst 7(1):87–107
Plotnikov A et al (2011) Nuclear extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 translocation is mediated by casein kinase 2 and accelerated by autophosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 31(17):3515–3530. http://mcb.asm.org/content/31/17/3515.long
Purvis JE et al (2012) p53 dynamics control cell fate. Science (New York) 336(6087):1440–1444
Schmierer B, Hill CS (2007) TGFbeta-SMAD signal transduction: molecular specificity and functional flexibility. Nat Rev. Mol Cell Biol 8(12):970–982
Seger R, Krebs EG (1995) The MAPK signaling cascade. FASEB J: Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol 9(9):726–735
Selimkhanov J et al (2014) Systems biology. Accurate information transmission through dynamic biochemical signaling networks. Science (New York) 346(6215):1370–1373
Shankaran H, Wiley HS (2010) Oscillatory dynamics of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20(6):650–655
Uda S et al (2013) Robustness and compensation of information transmission of signaling pathways. Science (New York) 341(6145):558–561
Voliotis M et al (2014) Information transfer by leaky, heterogeneous, protein kinase signaling systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(3):E326–E333
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benary, M., Nolis, I., Blüthgen, N., Loewer, A. (2018). Information Flow in a Mammalian Signal Transduction Pathway. In: Bossert, M. (eds) Information- and Communication Theory in Molecular Biology. Lecture Notes in Bioengineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54729-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54729-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54728-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54729-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)